Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation by: Michael Tarbert Environmental Sustainability REU

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Presentation by: Michael Tarbert Environmental Sustainability REU"— Presentation transcript:

1 Using an Infrastructure Planning Support System to quantify climate change
Presentation by: Michael Tarbert Environmental Sustainability REU Advisor: Dr. Chinowsky Mentor: Amy Schweikert

2 Presentation Outline Project Background Methodology Results
Conclusions Summary

3 ICliCS, IPSS, Research Importance
Project BAckground

4 Background ICliCS researches the immediate and far reaching effects of climate, both quantitatively and qualitatively on basic infrastructure. Contracts with International organizations and governments.

5 Background: Infrastructure
Why is infrastructure important? Key to economic growth. Important for social growth, especially in developing countries. Indicator for all 8 Millennium Development goals (African Union, 2005)

6 Background: Importance
Why is climate change important to infrastructure? First, we must accept climate change is currently happening, and will continue to occur. Second, we must understand the importance of Infrastructure and transportation networks to the human population. Third, infrastructure is vulnerable to the effects of climate change. This study focuses on the road transportation

7 Background: IPSS Infrastructure Planning Support System (IPSS)
Program that utilizes global climate modeling predictions through the year 2100 to produce quantitative data Monetary costs to adapt, and not to adapt to climate change (Produce annual costs) Study uses IPSS to: quantify the impacts climate change (temperature and precipitation) on road infrastructure. Assist policymakers to determine future actions.

8 Background: Purpose The purpose of this study is to update a former study- ‘Climate change: comparative impact on developing and developed countries’ (Chinowsky et al. 2011) Climate change impacts on road infrastructure in 10 different countries, ranging from Lower to Upper income levels. Show why adapting is necessary Show why developing countries are especially in danger!

9 Background: 10 Countries
Country World Bank income level Total KM Road Ethiopia Lower 36 469 Cameroon Lower-middle 50 000 The Philippines Bolivia 62 479 Croatia Upper-middle 29 038 Venezuela 96 145 Sweden High New Zealand 93 748 Japan Italy

10 Climate Modeling, Road Impacts
Methodology

11 Methodology: Climate Modeling
Global Circulation Models (GCM’s) 54 IPCC approved models Future climate predictions GIS as a tool using Climate Research Units (CRU) (grid structure) Climate data (GCM’s) applied to road inventory by CRU grid.

12 Methodology: Road Impacts
IPSS looks for stress factors Precipitation or temperature threshold is exceeded, inducing extra maintenance cost. Left with decision: To adapt, or not to adapt… Unpaved  Gravel Gravel  Update drainage methods Paved  Update Binder types ***No adapt incurs increased maintenance costs

13 Median/Max costs, Opportunity Cost, Risk Analysis
Results

14 Results: determining Max/Median
Finding Median and Maximum Costs by GCM

15

16

17

18

19 Results: Opportunity Cost
Universal evaluation method developed by ICliCS OCx=(CCx⁄SRCx)/PRx X- country of interest OC- Opportunity Cost (%) CC- Total cost of climate change SRC- cost to construct 1 km of secondary paved road PR- Countries current paved road stock Shows the amount of paved road inventory a country could have constructed through 2100

20 Results: Opportunity Cost
Country Opportunity Cost Bolivia 334% Ethiopia 407% Cameroon 139% Croatia 196% The Philippines 294% Venezuela 94% Sweden 74% New Zealand 124% Japan 45% Italy 66%

21 Results: Risk Analysis

22 Results: Risk Analysis

23 Results: Risk Analysis

24 Country Total Max Adapt Total Median Adapt Total Max No Adapt Total Median No Adapt Bolivia $ $ $ $ Ethiopia $ $ $ $ Cameroon $ $ $ $ Croatia $ $ $ $ The Philippines $ $ $ $ Venezuela $ $ $ $ Sweden $ $ $ $ New Zealand $ $ $ $ Japan $ $ $ $ Italy $39,400.30 $34,477.20 $130,281.9 $138,006.4

25 Adapting, Developing Countries, Future Work
Conclusions

26 Conclusions Adapting road infrastructure is beneficial
It makes ‘cents’ Positive social implications Assists in meeting MDG

27 Conclusions Developing countries incur the most cost
Yet, have the least amount of resources to adapt let alone expand infrastructure IPSS is a tool that can be used to formulate infrastructure plans and mitigate climate change impacts

28 Conclusions: Future Work
Sustainable construction practices More in-depth country detail- accuracy Including a growth function for road stock More realistic approach

29 Questions?


Download ppt "Presentation by: Michael Tarbert Environmental Sustainability REU"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google