1. 9/18/20151 FORSCOM INTERNAL REVIEW REENGINEERING INITIATIVE

2. 9/18/20152 Initiative u FORSCOM Viewed USAAA as Viable Alternative to Internal Review u Transfer Internal Review Spaces and Workload to The Auditor General –Save Money? –Improve Effectiveness and Efficiency?

3. 9/18/20153 Background u FORSCOM Designated Reinvention Center u Follow-on to Earlier Initiative to Consolidate IR with IG –Rejected Due to Legal Implications u ASA(FM&C) Approved Test u FORSCOM Transferred $700,000 to USAAA for Test

4. 9/18/20154 Background (continued) u Evaluation Plan Drafted and Approved by –ASA(FM&C) –The Auditor General –HQ, FORSCOM u TIG to Lead Evaluation u Evaluation Team Also Selected and Approved by Principals

5. 9/18/20155 Test Period (1June 1995 - 31 May 1996) u Five Test Sites (Volunteer) –HQ, FORSCOM –Fort Drum –Fort Hood –Fort Lewis –Fort Stewart u Five Control Sites –Fort Bragg –Fort Campbell –Fort Carson –Fort Polk –Fort Riley

6. 9/18/20156 Evaluation Criteria u Objective: “To determine the most efficient and effective means for FORSCOM commanders to obtain internal audit services.” u Success Criteria: –Highest Return on Investment –Highest Rate of Productivity –Highest Degree of Customer Satisfaction

7. 9/18/20157 Evaluation Team u DAIG - Lead u ASA(FM&C) u USAAA u HQ, FORSCOM u Fort Sam Houston

8. 9/18/20158 Evaluation Methodology u Products # u Costs * u Interviews u Questionnaire INVESTMENTCUST SATFCTNPRODUCTIVITY # Productivity Data Period - 1 October 95 thru 31 March 96 * Investment Data Period - 1 August 95 thru 31 March 96

9. 9/18/20159 Productivity Results u Total Audit Engagements Per Staff Year –Internal Review - 7.89 –Command Audit - 6.10 Products Generated During Test Period

10. 9/18/201510 Cost Results u Cost of Operations (1AUG95 - 31MAR96) –Internal Review - $826.4K –Command Audit - $687.8K u Purchased –Internal Review - 11.4 Staff-Years –Command Audit - 8.5 Staff-Years u Cost Per Staff-Year –Internal Review - $52.6 K –Command Audit - $61.0 K Difference 21%

11. 9/18/201511 Cost u Savings Generated –Internal Review - $1.79M Per Staff-Year –Command Audit - $1.46M Per Staff-Year* u Return on Investment –Internal Review - $28.4 to $1 –Command Audit - $22.9 to $1* * $8M Added as Revised Figure- Added 0.94 Per Staff-Year Difference 24%

12. 9/18/201512 Customer Satisfaction u Interviews –All Satisfied With Services Rendered u Questionnaires –Advantage Internal Review

13. 9/18/201513 Summary u Is Command Audit a Viable Option for Internal Audit? –Yes u Do Test Results Indicate That Command Audit Is The Most Effective and Efficient Option? –No. Internal Review Offices Cost Less Per Staff-Year, Produced More Products and Provided a Greater Return on Investment for Their Commanders

14. 9/18/201514 Considerations Not Addressed u Legal Issues u National Performance Review u HQ Redesign u GAO Standards u Unity of Command ?