Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

New Zealand Society of Actuaries Financial Services Forum 27 November 2009.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "New Zealand Society of Actuaries Financial Services Forum 27 November 2009."— Presentation transcript:

1 New Zealand Society of Actuaries Financial Services Forum 27 November 2009

2 Do cohort mortality trends emigrate? Alison O’Connell New Zealand Society of Actuaries Financial Services Forum Auckland, 27 November 2009

3 Why should we be interested? The UK has a golden cohort, born 1923-1940, of ‘super-select’ longevity. Are migrants from this cohort a risk for NZ Super? Multi-disciplinary Actuarial Profession conference on mortality and longevity in Edinburgh, October 2009: optimism on future longevity

4 UK migrants to New Zealand Dominant source country historically; still significant Largest birth country of overseas-born residents (6% of total population) 13% of NZ deaths were born in UK Nearly all NZ residents born in UK of golden cohort ages have been in NZ for 30+ years; over half for 40+ years Source data from Statistics New Zealand

5 Basis of mortality analysis and forecasting Annual rate of change in the mortality rate = 1 - q x,t /q x,t-1 (or m x ) >0 if mortality is improving

6 England & Wales average annual rate of mortality improvement: The golden cohort Males Age1961-711971-811981-911991-20011996-2006 02.5%3.9%3.1%4.0%3.4% 50.8%4.6%2.7%6.0%1.4% 100.6%2.5%2.2%2.3%1.9% 150.3%1.3%1.0%3.1%2.7% 201.7%1.2%-0.7%1.0%2.3% 251.8%0.5%-0.5% 1.5% 301.4% -0.7%-0.8%0.9% 351.3%2.1%-0.7%0.7%0.5% 400.3%2.1%1.5%0.8%1.2% 450.0%2.1%2.4%0.9%1.2% 500.2%1.5%2.8%2.2%1.2% 551.1%0.8%3.2%2.6%2.4% 601.2% 2.4%3.1%3.0% 650.7%1.4%1.6%3.6%3.7% 700.5%1.1%1.7%2.9%4.0% 750.8%0.7%1.6%2.2%3.2% 801.0%0.3%1.3%2.1%2.6% 851.2%0.2%1.1%1.2%2.4% Source: Calculated from period q x, ONS Females 1961-711971-811981-911991-20011996-2006 2.3%3.7%3.3%3.2%1.4% 1.1%3.8%2.0%2.5%2.1% 0.4%2.0%2.6%3.7%1.0% 0.1%1.8%1.2%1.5%2.5% 1.8%1.9%0.5%1.0%2.2% 1.6%1.2%1.7%0.0%1.4% 1.7%2.2%1.3%0.4%2.0% 1.6%2.1%1.2%0.3%1.4% 0.9%2.0%2.6%0.4%1.4% 0.0%2.0%2.3%1.2%1.0% 0.2%1.2%2.6%1.3%1.5% 0.3%0.4%2.4%2.0% 1.2%0.4%1.3%2.7%2.3% 1.5%0.7% 2.9%3.1% 1.7%1.1%1.0%2.1%3.2% 1.7%1.3% 1.5%2.4% 1.8%0.8%1.5%1.4%2.0% 1.4%0.6%1.5%0.9%1.7% Shading: Cell value exceeds average plus 1 SD for that time period (ages 20+ only)

7 Questions for today 1.What caused the golden cohort? 2.Did the mortality advantages of the UK’s golden cohort migrate to NZ? 3.Does NZ have a golden cohort? 4.What does this mean for future longevity in NZ?

8 What caused the golden cohort? Small cohorts WWII diet as children Welfare State after WWII Smoking declines early-mid life Medical improvements later life...?

9 Cohort life expectancies: history Source data: Cohort tables, ONS and Statistics New Zealand e0 e45 e65 Males

10 Courtesy The Plunket Society

11

12 Questions for today 1.What caused the golden cohort? 2.Did the mortality advantages of the UK’s golden cohort migrate to NZ? 3.Does NZ have a golden cohort? 4.What does this mean for future longevity in NZ?

13 UK migrants have better mortality than NZ-born Source: Calculated from Statistics New Zealand data MalesFemales 1990-21995-72000-22005-71990-21995-72000-22005-7 New Zealand born SMR105 106108104 105 CI lower104 105106103 104 CI upper106 107109105 107 United Kingdom born SMR95939492949695 CI lower9291 89929492 CI upper9796 94979997 Other overseas born SMR1039697941059610094 CI lower100939491101939791 CI upper107991009710910010396 SMRs to estimated resident total New Zealand population

14 UK migrants have better mortality at golden cohort ages Source: Calculated from Statistics New Zealand data MalesFemales Ages1990-21995-72000-22005-71990-21995-72000-22005-7 0-34n/a 35-5973767376776973 ******** 60-849694959192 9088 ******** 85+105102 101 106104 * SMRs of UK born NZ residents to estimated resident total NZ population * denotes significance at 95% level n/a indicates number of deaths fewer than 100

15 UK golden cohort migrants have better mortality than NZ-born NM Source: Calculated from Statistics New Zealand data SMRs to estimated resident total New Zealand population, 2005-7 Males All Māori All non- Māori NZ born non- Māori UK born Females All Māori All non- Māori NZ born non- Māori UK born All ages19394100921939510095 ****** 0-341658495n/a1688190n/a ***** 35-59233859076212869473 ******** 60-841969510191214949988 ****** 85+103100105101112100102104 **

16 Questions for today 1.What caused the golden cohort? 2.Did the mortality advantages of the UK’s golden cohort migrate to NZ? 3.Does NZ have a golden cohort? 4.What does this mean for future longevity in NZ?

17 New Zealand average annual rate of mortality improvement: A golden cohort? Males Age1961-711971-811981-911991-20011996-2006 02.4%2.9%2.6%4.6%3.2% 51.6%2.7% 5.1%3.7% 101.5%3.4%-0.1%3.3%2.2% 15-2.7%1.2%0.3%3.5%4.4% 20-1.0%-0.8%-0.9%5.0%3.7% 250.2%-0.9%-0.3%2.3%3.5% 300.2%1.1%0.0%1.2%3.0% 35-0.4%2.4%-0.1%2.4%1.0% 40-0.6%2.1%2.2%1.9%0.6% 450.0%1.5%2.7%2.9%1.9% 50-0.4%2.0%2.3%3.6%3.0% 55-0.7%1.5%2.7%3.9%3.8% 60-0.4%1.5%2.8%3.5%4.1% 65-0.5%1.2%2.5%3.3%4.1% 70-0.3%1.0%2.1%2.8%3.8% 75-0.4%0.9%2.0%2.5%3.2% 80-0.1%0.9%1.3%2.4%2.8% 850.2%0.8%1.8%1.0%1.8% Source: Calculated from period q x, Statistics New Zealand Females 1961-711971-811981-911991-20011996-2006 2.3%2.5%5.3%1.6%2.2% 1.4%3.9%0.5%3.7%3.3% 0.9%2.6%3.3%0.9%3.7% -1.5%-0.4%2.0%3.8%2.9% -0.3%-1.3%1.8%2.8%4.1% 0.9%0.7%1.1%1.4%4.9% 0.7%2.0%1.1%2.0%1.5% 0.7%2.7%1.3%2.9%1.1% -0.5%2.1% 3.0%1.0% -0.6%0.6%2.9%3.3%2.1% -0.2%1.3%1.2%3.6%3.3% 0.4%0.6%1.8%2.8%3.5% 0.5%1.2%1.7%2.1%3.2% 0.3%0.7%2.4%2.2%2.9% 0.7%1.3%1.9%2.6% 0.9%1.9% 2.1%2.5% 0.9%1.8%1.5%2.1% 0.4%2.4%1.3% 1.5% Shading: Cell value exceeds average plus 1 SD for that time period (ages 20+ only)

18 New Zealand average annual rate of mortality improvement: A golden cohort? Males Age1961-711971-811981-911991-20011996-2006 02.4%2.9%2.6%4.6%3.2% 51.6%2.7% 5.1%3.7% 101.5%3.4%-0.1%3.3%2.2% 15-2.7%1.2%0.3%3.5%4.4% 20-1.0%-0.8%-0.9%5.0%3.7% 250.2%-0.9%-0.3%2.3%3.5% 300.2%1.1%0.0%1.2%3.0% 35-0.4%2.4%-0.1%2.4%1.0% 40-0.6%2.1%2.2%1.9%0.6% 450.0%1.5%2.7%2.9%1.9% 50-0.4%2.0%2.3%3.6%3.0% 55-0.7%1.5%2.7%3.9%3.8% 60-0.4%1.5%2.8%3.5%4.1% 65-0.5%1.2%2.5%3.3%4.1% 70-0.3%1.0%2.1%2.8%3.8% 75-0.4%0.9%2.0%2.5%3.2% 80-0.1%0.9%1.3%2.4%2.8% 850.2%0.8%1.8%1.0%1.8% Source: Calculated from period q x, Statistics New Zealand Females 1961-711971-811981-911991-20011996-2006 2.3%2.5%5.3%1.6%2.2% 1.4%3.9%0.5%3.7%3.3% 0.9%2.6%3.3%0.9%3.7% -1.5%-0.4%2.0%3.8%2.9% -0.3%-1.3%1.8%2.8%4.1% 0.9%0.7%1.1%1.4%4.9% 0.7%2.0%1.1%2.0%1.5% 0.7%2.7%1.3%2.9%1.1% -0.5%2.1% 3.0%1.0% -0.6%0.6%2.9%3.3%2.1% -0.2%1.3%1.2%3.6%3.3% 0.4%0.6%1.8%2.8%3.5% 0.5%1.2%1.7%2.1%3.2% 0.3%0.7%2.4%2.2%2.9% 0.7%1.3%1.9%2.6% 0.9%1.9% 2.1%2.5% 0.9%1.8%1.5%2.1% 0.4%2.4%1.3% 1.5% Shading: Cell value exceeds average plus 1 SD for that time period (ages 20+ only)

19 Questions for today 1.What caused the golden cohort? 2.Did the mortality advantages of the UK’s golden cohort migrate to NZ? 3.Does NZ have a golden cohort? 4.What does this mean for future longevity in NZ?

20 Recent rate of mortality improvement: mostly higher in NZ, 1996-2006 Males Females AgeNZE&WNZE&W 03.2%3.4%2.2%1.4% 53.7%1.4%3.3%2.1% 102.2%1.9%3.7%1.0% 154.4%2.7%2.9%2.5% 203.7%2.3%4.1%2.2% 253.5%1.5%4.9%1.4% 303.0%0.9%1.5%2.0% 351.0%0.5%1.1%1.4% 400.6%1.2%1.0%1.4% 451.9%1.2%2.1%1.0% 503.0%1.2%3.3%1.5% 553.8%2.4%3.5%2.0% 604.1%3.0%3.2%2.3% 654.1%3.7%2.9%3.1% 703.8%4.0%2.6%3.2% 753.2% 2.5%2.4% 802.8%2.6%2.1%2.0% 851.8%2.4%1.5%1.7% Source: Calculated from period q x, ONS and Statistics New Zealand

21 Average annual rate of all-ages mortality improvement: males Source: Calculated from period q x, ONS and Statistics New Zealand

22 e x NZ as ratio to E&W Source: Period life tables 2005-7, ONS and Statistics New Zealand Period e 0, 2005-7 MaleFemale E&W77.481.7 NZ78.082.2

23 q x NZ as ratio to E&W Source: Period life tables 2005-7, ONS and Statistics New Zealand

24 Assumptions in national projections, medium scenario Annual mortality improvement rate2006-20312032-2061 England & Wales 2006 & 2008-based Varies by age; averages to 2.1% 1% except golden cohort up to 2.5% New Zealand 2006-based 1.6% for all ages0.6% for all ages Source: ONS and Statistics New Zealand New Zealand 2009-base Varies by age; averages to 1.6% (m) 1.7% (f) Varies by age; averages to 1.6% (m) 2.0% (f)

25 Mutually consistent projections? Source: ONS 2008-based projections, Statistics New Zealand 2009-base projections Period e0, female, 2060/1, by mortality scenario

26 Some answers, and more questions 1.What caused the golden cohort? This data consistent with ante-natal and early life explanation. 2.Did the mortality advantages of the UK’s golden cohort migrate to NZ? Possibly. Effect may be masked by NZ healthier environment at middle to older ages. 3.Does NZ have a golden cohort? Yes (sort of), and age-related mortality improvement trends.

27 Some answers, and more questions 4.What does this mean for future longevity in NZ? Address high accident mortality at young ages. Should super planning allow for a super- select cohort? Mortality is improving faster in NZ than UK: why? Are UK and NZ projections mutually consistent?

28 New Zealand Society of Actuaries Financial Services Forum 27 November 2009


Download ppt "New Zealand Society of Actuaries Financial Services Forum 27 November 2009."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google