Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Solving the Reactor Kinetics Equations numerically

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Solving the Reactor Kinetics Equations numerically"— Presentation transcript:

1 Solving the Reactor Kinetics Equations numerically
enables to reproduce the initial phase of the Chernobyl Accident Frigyes Reisch Nuclear Power Safety KTH, Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm, Sweden Brookhaven National Laboratory 3 November 2005

2 The classical reactor kinetic equations
with six groups of delayed neutrons are not solved analytically Here they are solved numerically with MATLAB and presented graphically

3 At the Chernobyl experiment
due to the abrupt decrease of the speed of the main circulation pumps at low reactor power and heavy Xenon poisoning and also due to several other reasons the void (steam) content in the coolant channels increased suddenly (~50%) Thus the positive void coefficient (~30 pcm/%) caused a large reactivity insertion.

4 The neutron flux and thereby the reactor power increased very fast
Due to the thermal inertia of the fuel and the limited amount of the fuel temperature coefficient the Doppler effect could not break the power excursion.

5 to characterize the process at the initial phase to use only the
Therefore to characterize the process at the initial phase to use only the reactor kinetics equations is sufficient.

6 The simplified neutron kinetics equations

7 t time (sec) N neutron flux (proportional to the reactor power) δk change of the neutron multiplication factor (k) β sum of the delayed neutron fractions neutron mean lifetime (sec) λi i:th decay constant (sec-1) ci concentration of the i:th fraction of the delayed neutrons at steady state N(0)=1

8 Constants and some related values for U235 thermal fission
β1= λ1=0.0124 β1/ λ1= 1/ λ1= sec 1/ λ2= sec β2= λ2=0.0305 β2/ λ2= 1/ λ2= sec β3= λ3=0.1110 β3/ λ3= λ4=0.3010 1/ λ4= sec β4= β4/ λ4= λ5=1.1400 β5/ λ5= β5= 1/ λ5= sec λ6=3.0100 β6= β6/ λ6= 1/ λ6= sec 0.0065 sec

9 The normalized value Nn(0)= 1
At steady state Initial values The normalized value Nn(0)= 1 cn1(0)= cn2(0)= cn3(0)=11.47 cn4(0)= cn5(0)= cn6(0)=0.0907

10 The one plus six differential equations
N’=(DeltaK/ )*N *c *c *c *c4+1.14* c *c6 c1’=0.2150*N * c1 c2’=1.1424*N * c2 c3’=1.2740*N * c3 c4’=2.5680*N * c4 c5’=0.7480*N * c5 c6’=0.2730*N * c5 The MATLAB notation x(1)=N x(2)=c1’ x(3)=c2’ x(4)=c3’ x(5)=c4’ x(6)=c5’ x(7)=c6’

11 The MATLAB code %Save as xprim7.m function xprim = xprim7(t,x,i)
DeltaK=i*0.010*0.50; %voidcoef=i*0.010pcm/percent void change, void increase 50percent xprim=[(DeltaK/ )*x(1) *x(2)… *x(3)+0.111*x(4)+0.301*x(5)+1.14*x(6)+3.01*x(7); 0.2150*x(1) *x(2); 1.1424*x(1) *x(3); 1.2740*x(1) *x(4); 2.5680*x(1) *x(5); 0.7480*x(1) * x(6); 0.2730*x(1) * x(7)];

12 The instruction to plot the graphic
%Save as NeutronKin.m figure hold on for i=-3:6:3 0.2],[1; 17.34;46.69;11.47;8.53;0.6561;0.0907],[] ,i); plot(t,x(:,1)) end hold off

13 At the time of the Chernobyl accident the void coefficient was about +30 pcm/%
Now a days it is diminished (due to higher enrichment but still positive) If the void coefficient was rather about -30 pcm/% the transient would have terminated itself.

14 A parameter study results in this graph:
With zero void coefficient there is neither power increase nor power decrease While negative void coefficient would lead to the decline of the power i.e. to shut down

15 A study of the delayed neutrons separately with +30 pcm/%
The 1st group has the largest time constant (1/ λ1= sec) Therefore the time delay is the longest there. The 6th group has the shortest time constant (1/ λ6= sec) Therefore the time delay is the least there. The 2nd group has the largest βi/ λi (= ) The 6th group has the smallest βi/ λi (= )

16


Download ppt "Solving the Reactor Kinetics Equations numerically"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google