1. For SIGAda Conference, 2005 November, Atlanta 1 A New Standards Project on Avoiding Programming Language Vulnerabilities Jim Moore Liaison Representative from IEEE Computer Society to ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 7 Liaison Representative between ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 7 and SC 22 Convener, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22/OWG Vulnerability James.W.Moore@ieee.org

2. For SIGAda Conference, 2005 November, Atlanta 2 Cyber Security is a Growing Problem -- From Joe Jarzombek, PMP, Director for Software Assurance, NCSD, DHS

3. For SIGAda Conference, 2005 November, Atlanta 3 Threat -- From Joe Jarzombek, PMP, Director for Software Assurance, NCSD, DHS The problem has implications for: Safety Privacy Security Economy Even national security

4. For SIGAda Conference, 2005 November, Atlanta 4 Government Response -- From Joe Jarzombek, PMP, Director for Software Assurance, NCSD, DHS There are initiatives underway in both DoD and DHS.

5. For SIGAda Conference, 2005 November, Atlanta 5 Relationship of Software Assurance to Other Disciplines

6. For SIGAda Conference, 2005 November, Atlanta 6 Relationship of Software Assurance to Other Disciplines Some avoidable mistakes are encouraged by poor usage (arguably, poor design) of programming languages.

7. For SIGAda Conference, 2005 November, Atlanta 7 Problem Any programming language has constructs that are imperfectly defined, implementation- dependent or difficult to use correctly. As a result, software programs sometimes execute differently than intended by the writer. In some cases, these vulnerabilities can be exploited by unfriendly parties. –Can compromise safety, security and privacy. –Can be used to make additional attacks.

8. For SIGAda Conference, 2005 November, Atlanta 8 Complicating Factors The choice of programming language for a project is not solely a technical decision and is not made solely by software engineers. Some vulnerabilities cannot be mitigated by better use of the language but require mitigation by other methods, e.g. review, static analysis.

9. For SIGAda Conference, 2005 November, Atlanta 9 JTC1TC176TC65 ISOIEC SC7SC27 Quality MgmtSafety IT SecuritySoftware and Systems Engineering SC22 Programming Languages

10. For SIGAda Conference, 2005 November, Atlanta 10 Guidance to Avoiding Vulnerabilities in Programming Languages through Language Selection and Use (1 of 3) New project in ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 22 will produce a Technical Report (which is not a standard). It will provide guidance, not requirements. Purpose:... prepare comparative guidance spanning a large number of programming languages, so that application developers will be better informed regarding the vulnerabilities inherent to candidate languages and the costs of avoiding such vulnerabilities. An additional benefit is that developers will be better prepared to select tooling to assist in the evaluation and avoidance of vulnerabilities...

11. For SIGAda Conference, 2005 November, Atlanta 11 Example from NUREG/CR-6463, Rev. 1, Review Guidelines for Software Languages for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Safety Systems: Final Report, 1997, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission If dynamic memory allocation is unavoidable, the source code should include provisions to ensure that: –All dynamically allocated memory during a specific execution cycle is released at the end of that cycle, and –The possibility of interruption of execution between the point where memory is dynamically allocated and when it is released is minimized (if not totally eliminated); there should also be provisions in the application code that will detect any situation where dynamically allocated memory has not been released and release such memory. To see the following languages select: Ada; C and C++ ; Pascal; PL/M; Ada 95.

12. For SIGAda Conference, 2005 November, Atlanta 12 Example from NUREG/CR-6463, Rev. 1, Review Guidelines for Software Languages for Use in Nuclear Power Plant Safety Systems: Final Report, 1997, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission The following discussion applies to C++ only. In C++, the functions to dynamically allocate and free memory are new and delete. The following guideline applies. Ensure that all classes include a destructor. To avoid memory leaks, all classes must include a destructor that releases any memory allocated by the class. Constructors must themselves be defined in a way to avoid possible memory leaks in case of failures. Ensure that for all derived classes there are virtual destructors.

13. For SIGAda Conference, 2005 November, Atlanta 13 Guidance to Avoiding Vulnerabilities in Programming Languages through Language Selection and Use (2 of 3)... the project will prefer linguistic means of avoiding vulnerabilities but, when necessary may describe extra-linguistic means (e.g. static analysis or targeted testing)... the project will prefer the avoidance of identified risks but, when necessary, may describe means to mitigate the risk of vulnerabilities that cannot be economically avoided... in cases where identified problems can be neither avoided nor mitigated, the report may assist users in understanding the nature of risk that must be accepted...

14. For SIGAda Conference, 2005 November, Atlanta 14 Example from ISO/IEC TR 15942:2000, Information technology Programming languages Guide for the use of the Ada programming language in high integrity systems Initialization of Variables All variables should be given a meaningful value before use. Failure to do so may raise a predefined exception or cause a bounded error at run-time. Initial values may be given by: 1. Associating an explicit initialization expression with the variable at the point of its declaration. 2. Making an assignment to the variable that will be executed prior to references to it. For state variables in packages, assignments may also be made in the package elaboration part. A consistent approach to the initialization of package state variables should be adopted. In all cases, Data Flow analysis should be used to confirm that every object has been assigned a value before it is used. The effectiveness of the analysis is undermined if variables are initialized unnecessarily (sometimes called junk initialization)....

15. For SIGAda Conference, 2005 November, Atlanta 15 Guidance to Avoiding Vulnerabilities in Programming Languages through Language Selection and Use (3 of 3)... in some situations, one construct might be preferred over another on the grounds that it is easier to test or easier to analyze. This relationship between construction and subsequent verification activities makes it clear that the report will be useful both for those emphasizing "correctness by construction" and those who desire to improve the predictability of execution through testing and analysis...

16. For SIGAda Conference, 2005 November, Atlanta 16 Status The project is now being organized. Temporarily, the project is assigned to SC22s OWG on Vulnerability chaired by Jim Moore. More information http://aitc.aitcnet.org/isai/