1. Ideas to Action (I2A) Presentation for Speed School Faculty April 22, 2008 Using Critical Thinking to Foster Student Learning and Community Engagement

2. Introductions I2A Team Dr. Patty Payette Dr. Cathy Bays Dr. Edna Ross Executive Director Delphi Specialist Delphi Specialist for Assessment for Critical Thinking Hannah Anthony, Program Assistant Senior Patty

3. Ideas to Action Implementation Ideas to Action (I2A): Using Critical Thinking to Foster Student Learning and Community Engagement is our Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP), and we need to show measurable progress to the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) by April 2012. Patty

4. I 2A and “Connecting the Dots” “Our extensive consultation with all University constituencies yielded a surprisingly strong and clear call for education focused on the skills and knowledge needed to deal with real-world issues and problems, an education in which students can see the importance of the parts (the courses) to the whole (their education as citizens and workers).” [QEP Report, 2007] http://louisville.edu/ideastoaction/files/finalreport.pdf skills and knowledge real-world issues & problems the parts to the whole Patty

5. I2A: What are the components? Sharpen our existing focus on building critical thinking skills in the general education program… …..continuing through undergraduate major courses with an emphasis on applying and refining those skills… …resulting in a culminating experience, such as a senior thesis, research, service learning project, internship, or capstone project that fosters engagement I2A Thematic Priority: Community Engagement Patty

6. Central Messages about I2A Prompted by Undergraduate Program Accreditation Enhancement of critical thinking, student engagement Speed School as exemplar Renewed focus on community engagement Assessment process under development Some programs in place; more being developed U of L Strategic Plan 2020: http://louisville.edu/provost/fromtheprovostitems/stratplan0308.html Patty

7. Critical Thinking Definition adopted for I 2A a guide to belief and action. that results in the intellectually disciplined process Critical thinking is (From: Scriven and Paul, 2003) Understanding Concepts Appreciation Decisions Synthesize Application Edna

8. A Well-Cultivated Critical Thinker:  Raises vital questions and problems, formulating them clearly and precisely  Gathers and assesses relevant information, using abstract ideas to interpret it effectively  Comes to well-reasoned conclusions and solutions, testing them against relevant criteria and standards  Thinks open mindedly within alternative systems of thought, recognizing and assessing, as needs be, their assumptions, implications, and practical consequences  Communicates effectively with others in figuring out solutions to complex problems (Richard Paul and Linda Elder, the Foundation for Critical Thinking: http://www.criticalthinking.org/) Edna

9. Intellectual Standards must be applied to The Elements of Thought in order to develop Intellectual Traits which will produce a well-cultivated Critical Thinker Richard Paul-Linda Elder Critical Thinking Model Cathy

10. Intellectual Standards CLARITY ACCURACY PRECISION RELEVANCE DEPTH BREADTH LOGIC SIGNIFICANCE FAIRNESS COMPLETENESS Miniature Guide, 2008, p. 8-10 Cathy

11. Miniature Guide, 2008, p. 3-6 Cathy

12. The Intellectual Traits Intellectual Humility Intellectual Courage Intellectual Empathy Intellectual Autonomy Intellectual Integrity Intellectual Perseverance Confidence in Reason Fairmindedness Miniature Guide, 2008, p. 13-15 Cathy

13. Telling Speed Students… Critical thinking is using logic to decide what to believe based on accurate and objective evidence. Critical thinking is the ability to think clearly and rationally. Critical thinking is the process of conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information as a guide to belief and action. Intellectual Standards = blueElements of Thought = red Critical thinking is using logic to decide what to believe based on accurate and objective evidence. Critical thinking is the ability to think clearly and rationally. Critical thinking is the process of conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information as a guide to belief and action. ENGR 100: Intro to Engineering Pat

14. Can you think critically? You take a metal tape and place it around the circumference of a basketball. Then, you add one inch to the length of the tape. Your friend places a similar metal tape around the world at the Equator. Then, your friend adds one inch to the length of that tape. If the gap between the basketball and the tape is equal all around the circumference of the ball, and the gap between the earth and the tape also is equal all around the circumference of the earth, how much larger is the gap around the ball than the gap around the earth? Assume the earth is a perfect sphere. ELEMENT of THOUGHT: Concepts INTELLECTUAL TRAIT: Confidence in Reason Confidence in Reason INTELLECTUAL STANDARDS: Relevance & Logic Pat

15. Trial of Critical Thinking The story New road construction House condemned, purchased by state House sold at auction, moved Blasting for new road Damage to house Joe

16. Trial of Critical Thinking Did blasting nearby cause the damage shown in the following photographs? What reasons can you provide for your answer to the previous question (evidence)? Joe

20. Trial of Critical Thinking Can you figure out what happened? Inferences Did blasting nearby cause the damage shown in the following photographs? Assumptions & Consequences What reasons can you provide for your answer to the previous question (evidence)? Concepts & Information Elements of Thought = red Joe

21. Significance: Now & Beyond Critical thinking involves “higher level” thinking essential to engineers. It often requires us to think “outside the box.” Engineering careers require critical thinking, at all levels. We can learn to think critically. Pat

22. How is critical thinking connected to engineering? Critical thinking is the core of engineering. Without critical thinking, engineering is not possible. If critical thinking is not present, whatever is occurring, it is not engineering. Pat

23. CEE 452: The New Foundation Engineering Haven’t been explicit about critical thinking… Decided to use tests of individual preparation [incentive] and team-based tests [to foster peer teaching/learning]. Used time constraint to allow me to follow-up. Goal was to increase critical thinking. PERSONAL EXPERIENCE Joe

24. First, a test of preparation… Closed book, closed notes. Individual test, for 5-10 minutes. Are you prepared to work with your peers? Test counts 20 % of grade for that class session. Intellectual Traits: Intellectual Autonomy & Intellectual Integrity Joe

25. How would you identify a “collapsible” soil by using laboratory tests? What standards would you apply? When an increment of load is applied to a doubly-drained soil sample in a standard consolidation test in the laboratory, where is the gradient that causes water to flow out of the sample highest? Where is the gradient lowest? Explain. If sand drains are installed in a clay layer under a dam, and the average drainage distance is reduced to one-tenth of the original drainage distance, by what factor is the time for any given degree of consolidation changed? Is the time longer or shorter? Show your work to explain your answer. Information Inferences, concepts Implications, consequences Elements of Thought = red TYPICAL QUESTIONS FOR TEST OF PREPARATION Joe

26. Then, a team-based test… Open book, open notes. Groups of 6-7 students. Members of groups changed. Test counts 80 % of grade for that class session. Bonus for group that finished first. Joe

27. What is the meaning of the term impedance when it is used to describe a pile? Why is impedance important? Why do load tests on piles driven into some types of ground show ultimate load capacities very different from the capacity inferred from use of the wave equation and data obtained during pile driving? What errors in evaluation of soils as foundation materials can occur in using plate load tests? What are the sources of these errors? Intellectual Standards: Relevance, depth, breadth, accuracy, precision Elements of Thought: information, concepts TYPICAL QUESTIONS—GROUP TESTS Joe

28. Group Tests Designed to foster critical thinking  Questions did not have obvious answers. Students were puzzled, at first. Then, “vigorous debates” occurred. Groups learned quickly that consensus answers were best. Intellectual Traits: Fairmindness, confidence in reason, intellectual humility, intellectual perseverance Joe

29. Evaluation of New CEE 452? I could explain remaining puzzles. Grades: 25% to 85% on prep tests, 60% to 74% on team-based tests. Combined grades: 54% to 79%, vs 68.6% on tests over same material in former years. 41  78 prep tests 50  76 team tests More coverage:50,50 questions and much more thorough testing this way. Joe

30. Jerry Evans & I2A Motivation for Joining I2A Task Group. Participation in Pilot Program –Choice of IE 643: Analysis for Decision Making. –Change of Syllabus. –Review of Paper Assignment. –Formative Feedback example. Jerry

31. Additions to IE 643 Syllabus Thought hard about what I wanted the students to get out of this class, instead of just listing topics to be covered. Front page of syllabus contained the following: Course Objectives: Analysis for Decision Making, an elective course for advanced undergraduate students and graduate students in Industrial Engineering and Decision Sciences, covers the various methodologies associated with the sub-field of Operations Research called Decision Analysis. Upon completion of the course, students should be able to: Provide structure for ill-structured problems. Identify/determine appropriate sets of decision makers, objectives, attributes, and alternative decisions for a given decision problem. Develop an appropriate criterion model for a given decision situation. Evaluate whether a decision tree, an influence diagram, a general simulation model, or some other evaluation methodology is appropriate for use in a given decision situation. Construct an appropriate evaluation model for a given decision situation. Construct an appropriate criterion model for a given decision situation. Use appropriate decision analysis and simulation software packages for given decision situations. Understand various applications of Decision Analysis in Engineering, Business, & Health Care. Jerry

32. IE 643: Paper Review Assignment Find, read and summarize an article from the literature involving an application of decision analysis. In developing your summary, try to “reason through” the process that the author(s) went through in doing a good decision analysis. As a part of your summary, provide the following: –The central problem addressed by this decision situation. –How the central problem was related to auxiliary problems. –Who the decision makers and stakeholders were for this problem. –What types of attributes were employed in the system that was developed. –What type of evaluation model was employed (and why). –Whether the system was employed to make a single decision or was used for ongoing decisions. –How the study resulted in an improvement in the problem situation. Jerry

33. IE 643: Formative Feedback (Mid-semester Evaluation) We have discussed several methodologies relative to the area of decision analysis thus far this semester. We will be devoting additional class time to some of these methodologies, as well as covering new methodologies. I would appreciate your opinions on how important/relevant these methodologies are to the general area of decision analysis, and also how well you think that you understand these areas. Answer the questions using the following scales (feel free to provide non-integer answers (e.g., 2.5)). Importance: Very Important (4), Moderately Important (3), Slightly Important (2), Of Little/No Importance (1) Level of Understanding Gained Thus Far: High (4), Moderate (3), Slight (2), Little/No (1) Problem Structuring Methods/Procedures Why-What’s Stopping ProcedureImportance: Level of Understanding: Vision and Mission StatementsImportance: Level of Understanding: Objectives hierarchies/networksImportance: Level of Understanding: Attributes (characteristics of a valid set)Importance: Level of Understanding: Quality-Adjusted Life Years AttributeImportance: Level of Understanding: Modeling/Analysis Methods/Procedures Bayes’ Theorem, probability calculationsImportance: Level of Understanding: Decision Trees Importance: Level of Understanding: Influence DiagramsImportance: Level of Understanding: Value of InformationImportance: Level of Understanding: DPL Software PackageImportance: Level of Understanding: Jerry

34. IE 643 Pilot Program Final Thoughts Critical thinking involves “thinking about thinking”. Two of the main things that I have gotten out of this is that I now think very hard about the way I think about things, and I try to convey this to the students. More importantly, I’m trying harder to think about the way that the students think about things. Jerry

35. I2A Resources & Next Steps: 08-09 Programs & Services I2A Faculty Learning Community (Fall 08) I2A Instructional Grants (Spring 2008) I2A Website w/ resources (Jan 08) I2A Delphi Specialist in Culminating Experiences I2A Campus Collaborations (SPI, Civic Engagement, Student Affairs) Patty

36. For more information Please visit: http://louisville.edu/ideastoaction Patty