Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Consensus building workshop Conference track OAEI-2007 Ondřej Šváb The University of Economics The Department of Information and Knowledge Engineering.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Consensus building workshop Conference track OAEI-2007 Ondřej Šváb The University of Economics The Department of Information and Knowledge Engineering."— Presentation transcript:

1 Consensus building workshop Conference track OAEI-2007 Ondřej Šváb The University of Economics The Department of Information and Knowledge Engineering

2 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 2 Outline Introduction (ideas behind the track) Evaluation Discussion – ‘interesting’ mappings

3 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 3 Features of conference track Broadly understandable domain of conference organisation Free exploration by participants within collection of 14 ontologies No a priori reference alignment participants: 6 research group

4 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 4 Dataset in conference track

5 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 5 Participants of conference track 6 participants –ASMOV –Falcon-AO –LILY –OLA –OntoDNA –SEMA

6 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 6 Outline… Introduction (ideas behind the track) Evaluation Discussion – ‘interesting’ mappings

7 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 7 Evaluation Manual evaluation as a precondition for Consensus Building Workshop Assessment based on personal judgement Tags: TP, FP, interesting, heterogenous mapping, unclear, trivial Types of errors and phenomena: –Subsumption, inverse property, siblings Subsumption mistaken for equivalence - Document, Presentation - Session, Tutorial Inverse property - has_a_review, write_review - has_parts, isPartOf Siblings mistaken for equivalence - Author, Reviewer - hasMail, first_name

8 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 8 Evaluation... http://nb.vse.cz/~svabo/oaei2007/ ratioSubs shows ratio of the number of subsumption errors and the number of incorrect mappings, ratioTriv shows ratio of the number of so-called trivial mappings and the number of correct mappings precision (P) is computed as ratio of the number of all correct mappings to the number of incorrect plus correct mappings, rrecall (rR) is computed as ratio of the number of all correct mappings to the number of all correct mappings. This is our "relative" recall.

9 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 9 Evaluation... Some statistics as a side-effect of processing http://nb.vse.cz/~svabo/oaei2007/

10 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 10 Outline… Introduction (ideas behind the track) Evaluation Discussion – ‘interesting’ mappings

11 Consensus Building Workshop

12 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 12 Our goal Focus on ‘interesting’ (unclear) mappings Discussion: –Why should they be mapped? Arguments against and for Track argumentation process

13 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 13 Our goal... Discuss mappings –generally –wrt. application usage Recall methodology of Grüninger and Fox –‘Identification of motivating scenarios’ –‘Elaboration of informal competency questions’ –But transport it into ontology matching field!

14 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 14 Use-case Transformation application: –transfer of data of the conference from one 'software tool for organising conference' to other 'software tool for organising conference‘ –Mapping ontologies correspond with ‘sw tools’

15 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 15 Informal competency questions After the transfer of data from one tool to another, will it be correct wrt. –the conflict of interests of authors vs. reviewers? –the assignment of papers to potential reviewers? –temporal aspect of the reviewing process? –temporal aspect of submission phase of papers/camera-ready versions? –registration requirements of participants of conference and members of commissions? –presentation of the contribution by at least one participant –...

16 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 16 Mapping 1 Element1Element2Relation confious: has_author pcs:submited_by= Notes Domain(has_author)=article, Range(has_author)=human Domain(submited_by)=DOCUMENT, Range(submited_by)=PERSON System Lily 1

17 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 17 Informal competency questions After the transfer of data from one tool to another, will it be correct wrt. –the conflict of interests of authors vs. reviewers? –the assignment of papers to potential reviewers? –temporal aspect of the reviewing process? –temporal aspect of submission phase of papers/camera-ready versions? –registration requirements of participants of conference and members of commissions? –presentation of the contribution by at least one participant –...

18 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 18 Mapping 2 Element1Element2Relation ekaw: Possible_ Reviewer cmt:Reviewer= Notes Equivalence or subsumption? System Lily 1

19 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 19 Mapping 2 Possible_Reviewer is domain of: reviewerOfPaper Possible_Reviewer is range of: hasReviewer ReviewWrittenBy ekaw.owl cmt.owl Reviewer is domain of: adjustBid assignedByAdministrator assignedExternalReviewer hasBeenAssigned markConflictOfInterest readPaper writeReview Reviewer is range of: adjustedBy assignedByReviewer assignedTo assignReviewer readByReviewer writtenBy

20 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 20 Informal competency questions After the transfer of data from one tool to another, will it be correct wrt. –the conflict of interests of authors vs. reviewers? –the assignment of papers to potential reviewers? –temporal aspect of the reviewing process? –temporal aspect of submission phase of papers/camera-ready versions? –registration requirements of participants of conference and members of commissions? –presentation of the contribution by at least one participant –...

21 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 21 Mapping 3 Element1Element2Relation ekaw,conference: Conference_ Participant Pcs: ConferenceMember = Notes Semantically same? System ASMOV 1, OLA 0.7(0.625)

22 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 22 Mapping 3a Conference.owl PCS.owl ConferenceMember is domain of member_of_conference ConferenceMember is range of has_conference_member

23 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 23 Mapping 3b PCS.owl ConferenceMember is domain of member_of_conference ConferenceMember is range of has_conference_member ekaw.owl

24 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 24 Informal competency questions After the transfer of data from one tool to another, will it be correct wrt. –the conflict of interests of authors vs. reviewers? –the assignment of papers to potential reviewers? –temporal aspect of the reviewing process? –temporal aspect of submission phase of papers/camera-ready versions? –registration requirements of participants of conference and members of commissions? –presentation of the contribution by at least one participant –...

25 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 25 Mapping 4 Element1Element2Relation sigkdd: Program_Committee_ Member Pcs: ConferenceMember = Notes Semantically same? System ASMOV 1

26 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 26 Mapping 4 sigkdd.owl PCS.owl ConferenceMember is domain of member_of_conference ConferenceMember is range of has_conference_member

27 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 27 Informal competency questions After the transfer of data from one tool to another, will it be correct wrt. –the conflict of interests of authors vs. reviewers? –the assignment of papers to potential reviewers? –temporal aspect of the reviewing process? –temporal aspect of submission phase of papers/camera-ready versions? –registration requirements of participants of conference and members of commissions? –presentation of the contribution by at least one participant –...

28 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 28 Mapping 5 Element1Element2Relation micro: begins crs_dr: has_startdate = Notes Domain(begins)=Activity or Conference, Range(begins)=dateTime Domain(has_startdate)=event, Range(has_startdate)=dateTime System ASMOV 1

29 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 29 Mapping 5 Micro.owl Activity is domain of begins ends expectedAttendance hasTopic isPartOf Activity is range of isIncluded crs_dr.owl event is domain of has_enddate has_startdate expectedAttendance hasTopic isPartOf Conference is domain of annualOrder begins ends isOrganizedBy isPartOf takesPlace Conference is range of isPartOf organizes

30 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 30 Informal competency questions After the transfer of data from one tool to another, will it be correct wrt. –the conflict of interests of authors vs. reviewers? –the assignment of papers to potential reviewers? –temporal aspect of the reviewing process? –temporal aspect of submission phase of papers/camera-ready versions? –registration requirements of participants of conference and members of commissions? –presentation of the contribution by at least one participant –...

31 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 31 Mapping 6 Element1Element2Relation sigkdd: Name_of_ conference pcs: Topic_of_conference = Notes Domain(Name_of...)=Conference, Range(Name_of...)=string Domain(Topic_of...)=Conference, Range(Topic_of...)=string Not fully specified in ontologies to distinguish? System ASMOV 1, LILY 1, OLA 0.84

32 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 32 Informal competency questions After the transfer of data from one tool to another, will it be correct wrt. –the conflict of interests of authors vs. reviewers? –the assignment of papers to potential reviewers? –temporal aspect of the reviewing process? –temporal aspect of submission phase of papers/camera-ready versions? –registration requirements of participants of conference and members of commissions? –presentation of the contribution by at least one participant –...

33 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 33 Mapping 7 Element1Element2Relation ekaw: Individual_ Presentation iasted: Presentation = Notes Subsumption or equivalence? System SEMA 1

34 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 34 Mapping 7 ekaw.owl Individ... is domain of presentationOfPaper ends expectedAttendance hasTopic isPartOf Individ... is range of paperPresentedAs Iasted.owl

35 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 35 Informal competency questions After the transfer of data from one tool to another, will it be correct wrt. –the conflict of interests of authors vs. reviewers? –the assignment of papers to potential reviewers? –temporal aspect of the reviewing process? –temporal aspect of submission phase of papers/camera-ready versions? –registration requirements of participants of conference and members of commissions? –presentation of the contribution by at least one participant –...

36 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 36 Mapping 8 Element1Element2Relation sigkdd: Start_of_ conference iasted: is_dated_on = Notes Domain(Start...)=Conference, Range(Start...)=dateTime Domain(is_dated_on)=Activity, Range(is_dated_on)=dateTime System ASMOV 1, OLA 0.52

37 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 37 Informal competency questions After the transfer of data from one tool to another, will it be correct wrt. –the conflict of interests of authors vs. reviewers? –the assignment of papers to potential reviewers? –temporal aspect of the reviewing process? –temporal aspect of submission phase of papers/camera-ready versions? –registration requirements of participants of conference and members of commissions? –presentation of the contribution by at least one participant –...

38 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 38 Mapping 9 Element1Element2Relation openconf: is_Type paperdyne: isTypeOf = Notes Domain(is_Type)=Paper_File, Range(is_Type)=Format Domain(isTypeOf)=not_specified, Range(isTypeOf )=string System Falcon 0.94, Lily 1, OntoDNA 1

39 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 39 Mapping 9 isTypeOf has subproperties: isAuthorTypeOf isPaperTypeOf Domain(isAuthorTypeOf)=Reviewer or Author Range(isAuthorTypeOf)={“invited”,”registred”} Domain(isPaperTypeOf)=Paper Range(isPaperTypeOf)={“invited”,”regular”}

40 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 40 Informal competency questions After the transfer of data from one tool to another, will it be correct wrt. –the conflict of interests of authors vs. reviewers? –the assignment of papers to potential reviewers? –temporal aspect of the reviewing process? –temporal aspect of submission phase of papers/camera-ready versions? –registration requirements of participants of conference and members of commissions? –presentation of the contribution by at least one participant –...

41 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 41 Mapping 10 Element1Element2Relation micro: Topic edas: Topic = Notes Equivalence? – instances, subclasses System ASMOV 1, Falcon 1, Lily 1, OLA 1, OntoDNA 1

42 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 42 Mapping 10 edas.owl micro.owl... Topic is domain of: isIncluded Topic is range of: hasTopic Topic is domain of: isTopicOf Topic is range of: hasTopic Compilers, ForwardLookingIdea, Microarchitecture, Systems, are instances of Topic

43 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 43 Informal competency questions After the transfer of data from one tool to another, will it be correct wrt. –the conflict of interests of authors vs. reviewers? –the assignment of papers to potential reviewers? –temporal aspect of the reviewing process? –temporal aspect of submission phase of papers/camera-ready versions? –registration requirements of participants of conference and members of commissions? –presentation of the contribution by at least one participant –...

44 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 44 Mapping 11 Element1Element2Relation ekaw: Presenter paperdyne: Speaker = Notes Semantically equivalent? System SEMA 1

45 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 45 Mapping 11 ekaw.owl paperdyne.owl Paper spokenBy only Speaker

46 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 46 Informal competency questions After the transfer of data from one tool to another, will it be correct wrt. –the conflict of interests of authors vs. reviewers? –the assignment of papers to potential reviewers? –temporal aspect of the reviewing process? –temporal aspect of submission phase of papers/camera-ready versions? –registration requirements of participants of conference and members of commissions? –presentation of the contribution by at least one participant –...

47 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 47 Mapping 12 Element1Element2Relation cocus: Preview edas: Review = Notes Lexical confusion... System Lily 1, OntoDNA 0.86

48 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 48 Informal competency questions After the transfer of data from one tool to another, will it be correct wrt. –the conflict of interests of authors vs. reviewers? –the assignment of papers to potential reviewers? –temporal aspect of the reviewing process? –temporal aspect of submission phase of papers/camera-ready versions? –registration requirements of participants of conference and members of commissions? –presentation of the contribution by at least one participant –...

49 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 49 Mapping 13 Element1Element2Relation conference: is_submitted_ at confious: is_concerned_ conference = Notes Domain(is_sub)=Conference_contribution, Range(is_sub)=Conference_volume Inverse property is is_submitted_at Domain(is_concerned)=, Range(is_concerned)=conference System ASMOV 1

50 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 50 Mapping 13 Usage for ‘is_concerned_conference’: cocus.owl conference.owl Conference_volume is subclass of Conference Inverse property of ‘is_submitted_at’ is ‘has_contributions’

51 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 51 Informal competency questions After the transfer of data from one tool to another, will it be correct wrt. –the conflict of interests of authors vs. reviewers? –the assignment of papers to potential reviewers? –temporal aspect of the reviewing process? –temporal aspect of submission phase of papers/camera-ready versions? –registration requirements of participants of conference and members of commissions? –presentation of the contribution by at least one participant –...

52 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 52 Mapping 14 Element1Element2Relation ekaw: coversTopic edas,confof: hasTopic = Notes confof: Domain(hasTopic)= Working_event Range(hasTopic)= Topic Domain(coversTopic)=Paper or Event, Range(coversTopic)=Research_Topic Event has Conference as a subclass Domain(hasTopic)=Conference or Paper, Range(isTopic)=Topic Topic has many subclasses with topics System LILY 1, OLA 0.55 (0.47)

53 11/11/2007Consensus Building Workshop within Conference track 53 Call for contribution to our dataset

54 Thank you for your participation!


Download ppt "Consensus building workshop Conference track OAEI-2007 Ondřej Šváb The University of Economics The Department of Information and Knowledge Engineering."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google