Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory Atmospheric Modeling Division, Research Triangle Park, NC September 17, 2015 Annmarie.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory Atmospheric Modeling Division, Research Triangle Park, NC September 17, 2015 Annmarie."— Presentation transcript:

1 Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory Atmospheric Modeling Division, Research Triangle Park, NC September 17, 2015 Annmarie Carlton, Rob Pinder, Prakash Bhave, George Pouliot CMAS – Chapel HIll, NC To What Extent Can Biogenic SOA be Controlled?

2 1 Important Findings CMAQ Simulations indicate anthropogenic pollution enhances predicted biogenic SOA concentrations in the U.S. substantially ~ 50% –Effects are largest in eastern U.S. –POC and NOx are largest individual pollutant classes contributing to overall biogenic SOA

3 2 Non-fossil (biogenic) carbon is a dominant component of atmospheric organic aerosol Substantial portion of PM 2.5 carbon is ‘modern’ even in urban areas (Lewis et al., 2004; Szidat et al., 2006; Bench et al., 2007; Gelencsér, et al., 2007) Tracer-based ambient SOA ‘measurements’ dominated by contributions from biogenic hydrocarbons (Edney et al., 2003; Kleindienst et al., 2007) Ambient WSOC, AMS OOA spectra and other indicators of SOA correlate strongly with tracers of anthropogenic pollution (Weber et al., 2007; de Gouw et al., 2005; Goldstein et al., 2009) If anthropogenic pollution is enhancing biogenic SOA how can this contribution be quantified? MOTIVATION

4 3 controllable emissions (e.g., anthropogenic VOCs) non-controllable (e.g., biogenic VOCs) POA anthropogenic VOCs oxidants biogenic VOCs oxidants SVOC POA SOA A SOA B SOA A SOA B Anthropogenic/Biogenic Interactions in SOA Formation H + effects not shown

5 4 Estimating Anthropogenic Contribution to “Biogenic” SOA Difficult to directly measure in the atmosphere –O 3, OH ambient measurements – no insight as to whether the precursor was anthropogenic or biogenic –PM mass - can make estimates only about organic precursors with detailed chemical analysis Can investigate large scale trends and relationships with an atmospheric model (CMAQ) by manipulating emissions

6 5 accumulation mode organic PM AOLGB AISO3 H+H+ AORGC ∙OH dissolution cloud water glyoxal methylglyoxal VOCs EMISSIONS isoprene sesquiterpenes monoterpene EMISSIONS Non-volatile EMISSIONS POA SV_TRP1 SV_TRP2 SV_ISO1, SV_ISO2 SV_SQT O 3 P, NO 3 O 3,O 3 P, or NO 3 ∙ OH Pathways do not contribute to SOA ∙ OH,O 3, or NO 3 ∙OH,O 3 ASQT ATRP1, ATRP2 AISO1, AISO2

7 6 Modeling experiment Simulation of August 15 - September 4, 2003 Continental US Time period has high biogenic contribution to SOA Emissions: controllable versus not controllable Not ControllableControllable Wildfire Prescribed burning VOCs from plants / trees Soil NO x Lightning NO x Everything else: Power plants Vehicles Agricultural burning Area sources

8 7 Percent of emitted species from controllable and uncontrollable sources controllable sources – gray uncontrollable sources - white Carlton et al., ES&T (2010)

9 8 Base CMAQ simulation all emissions Fraction of biogenic SOA from controllable pollution non-controllable emissions = biogenic emissions + wildfires + prescribed burns Biogenic SOA at the Surface (<~34 m): 18 day average Results averaged from Aug. 18 th – Sep. 4 th, 2003 Carlton et al., ES&T (2010) fraction

10 9 Additional simulations to estimate effects and contributions of individual species POC, NO x, VOC, SO 2, NH 3 Difference in predicted biogenic SOA mass concentrations Maxima for time periodAverage for time period On Average ~ 1 ug/m3 of Biogenic SOA in SE is from controllable sources

11 10 To control biogenic SOA – what should regulators focus on? What emitted species are most important? What locations are most impacted? Group the anthropogenic emissions into –VOC: Volatile Organic Carbon –POC: Primary Organic Carbon Particles –NO x Remove one of these species at a time Calculate change in biogenic SOA

12 11 Regional Influence of Controllable Emissions on “Biogenic” SOA Surface (<~34 m) Concentration; 18 day average Controllable SO 2 Controllable NO x Controllable POC

13 12 Change in population-weighted AQ metrics

14 13 2003 Monthly-Averaged CMAQ Results at RTP Cloud SOA

15 14 glyoxal 2003 Monthly-Averaged CMAQ Results at RTP methylglyoxal Cloud SOA Precursors

16 15 ∙ OH Cloud SOA Precursors SOA formation is photochemistry

17 16 Conclusions Used CMAQ to estimate fraction of biogenic SOA that is controllable. In the Eastern US, ~50% of the biogenic SOA can be controlled by reducing anthropogenic emissions To reduce concentrations of biogenic SOA, focus on –primary organic carbonaceous particles (POC) and NO x –SO 2 impacts biogenic SOA in the southeastern US Cloud-produced SOA exhibits seasonal cycle similar to ∙ OH and biogenic VOCs

18 17 Acknowledgements Sergey Napelenok Marc Houyoux Alice Gilliland Rohit Mathur Golam Sarwar Ed Edney, Tad Kleindist, John Offenburg, Michael Lewandowski Charles Chang & Ryan Cleary


Download ppt "Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory Atmospheric Modeling Division, Research Triangle Park, NC September 17, 2015 Annmarie."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google