Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMyrtle Bailey Modified over 9 years ago
1
Extending University-Urban School Partnerships: The Memphis Striving Readers Project Richard Potts, Memphis City Schools Elizabeth Heeren, Memphis City Schools Regina Washington, Memphis City Schools AERA Conference, March 27, 2008
2
Motivation behind MSRP Memphis is among the least-educated cities in the US –24.3% of adults has less than a HS education –36.7% have HS diploma or equivalent –30.5% has Assoc. or some college –8.5% has at least a BA MCS is 21st largest K12 district in US >116,000 students –Over 95% of MCS’ 196 schools are Title I schools –71% of MCS students qualify for free/reduced price lunch –MCS students are 87% AA; 9% White; 4% “other” –In 85% of MCS schools, 33% of students change schools during yr –71% of
3
Overall MSRP Goals To determine: 1.The effects of MCLA on core subject teachers’ knowledge and use of SBRR 2.The separate and combined effects of MCLA and Read 180 on students’ reading achievement levels, especially students who are identified as struggling readers 3.The separate and combined effects of MCLA and Read 180 on students’ achievement in core subjects, especially students who are identified as struggling readers
4
Overall MSRP Goals To determine: 1.The effects of MCLA on core subject teachers’ knowledge and use of SBRR 2.The separate and combined effects of MCLA and Read 180 on students’ reading achievement levels, especially students who are identified as struggling readers 3.The separate and combined effects of MCLA and Read 180 on students’ achievement in core subjects, especially students who are identified as struggling readers
5
Overall MSRP Goals To determine: 1.The effects of MCLA on core subject teachers’ knowledge and use of SBRR 2.The separate and combined effects of MCLA and Read 180 on students’ reading achievement levels, especially students who are identified as struggling readers 3.The separate and combined effects of MCLA and Read 180 on students’ achievement in core subjects, especially students who are identified as struggling readers
6
NSDC recommendations for policymakers 1. Ensure that professional development focuses on the subject matter teachers will be teaching. 2. Align teachers’ learning experiences with their real work experiences, using actual curriculum materials and assessments. 3. Provide adequate time for professional development and ensure that there are extended opportunities to learn emphasizing and analyzing students’ understanding of the subject matter. 4. Ensure that school districts have reliable systems for evaluating the impact of professional development on teacher practice and student learning.
7
Donovan & Greenburg, 2003 Launch new partnerships strategically. Reconfigure existing partnerships thoughtfully. Respect and encourage different kinds of leadership. Carefully attend to the team leader’s role. Institutionalize partnership work and roles early in the process. Sustain the collaborative process through democratic conversations. Engage partners through clearly defined and agreed-upon roles. Determine institutional rewards for partnering. Anticipate the likely challenges of partnership building. Share data and use it strategically. Build a culture of self-reflection and maximize opportunities for shared learning. Promote collaboration through funding. Use partnerships to shape and implement policy.
8
Relevant Research Base Institutional Commitments Situational Context Personal Attributes & Beliefs Heuristic for School District – University Partnerships
9
Relevant Research Base Share data and use it strategically RBS provides external data Coaches and instructors participate in interviews Revised math sessions of MCLA
10
Institutional Commitments Build a culture of self-reflection and maximize opportunities for shared learning Santa Cruz training and CREDE encourage reflection Coaches reflect on their roles and present about their experiences PI’s meet regularly with district staff
11
Personal Attributes & Beliefs Respect and encourage different types of leadership Visionary leaders and “on the ground” implementation Coaches encouraged to take on leadership roles Principals’ Fellowship creates site leaders
12
Monthly conference calls with DOE Using data to shape MCS policy (coaches) SRG data impacts future legislation Presentations at multiple conferences RBS data to monitor and adjust project Situational Context Use partnerships to shape and implement policy
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.