1. Validating the Need for Systemic Change Leaders of Learners March 27-28, 2013

2. Phase 1 Level II (2012 & 2013) Level III (Advanced) STAAR Performance Standards Final Level II (2016 and beyond) Phase 2 Level II (2014 & 2015) 157552% 163765% 170075% 178387% Scale Score Percent Correct Grade 8 Reading Level II (Satisfactory) Sufficiently prepared for the next grade level or course Level III (Advanced) Well prepared for the next grade level or course Level I (Unsatisfactory) Inadequately prepared for the next grade level or course

3. Phase 1 Level II (2012 & 2013) Level III (Advanced) STAAR Performance Standards Final Level II (2016 and beyond) Phase 2 Level II (2014 & 2015) 350037% 375050% 400063% 433378% Scale Score Percent Correct Algebra I Level II (Satisfactory) Sufficiently prepared for the next grade level or course Level III (Advanced) Well prepared for the next grade level or course Level I (Unsatisfactory) Inadequately prepared for the next grade level or course

4. All tests, grades 3 – 8 and Reading 1 at Level II Final

5. All tests, grades 3 – 8 and Algebra 1 at Level II Final

6. Source: 2011-12 AEIS

9. 4- or 5-Year Grad RateRHSP/DAPIndex 4 - Part 1 Overall District Name Total Pts Max Pts Max Pts Total Pts Max Pts Total Pts Max Pts Score Denton669.7700628.97001298.61400 93 Grapevine-Colleyville817.8900603.87001421.61600 89 Hurst-Euless-Bedford668.5700666.18001334.61500 89 Eagle Mountain-Saginaw800.1900562.77001362.81600 85 Grand Prairie627.9700560.17001188.01400 85 Keller827.0900523.37001350.31600 84 Northwest579.8700505.36001085.11300 83 Pflugerville763.9900568.47001332.31600 83 Irving510.7600464.1600974.81200 81 Mansfield875.51000589.78001465.21800 81 Arlington733.0900540.47001273.41600 80 Carrollton-Farmers Branch609.2700511.87001121.01400 80 Fort Worth519.6700668.98001188.51500 79 Birdville804.71000562.18001366.81800 76 Source: Moak Casey, based on 2012 AEIS Projected 2013 District Performance, Accountability Index 4

14. # tests below minimum # tests met minimum but not passing 01234Total 01273361167 19044125151 230214156 32218444 491120 566 Total15722153121 444 students 2015 Cohort EOC Retesting (Number of students remaining after December testing) 277 students must take one or more tests Failing scores on one or more tests

15. Phase 1 Level II (2012 & 2013) Level III (Advanced) STAAR Performance Standards Phase-in Final Level II (2016 and beyond) Phase 2 Level II (2014 & 2015) 350037% 375050% 400063% 433378% Scale Score Percent Correct Algebra I

16. Continuous improvement timeline Feb 2003 BISD enters ESC XI Continuous Improvement Consortium with Weatherford and Burleson ISDs Jul 2003Jim Shipley CI overview training for principals Mar 2004 BISD Board Orientation Apr 2004Board approves new goals/objectives, Graduate Profile Apr 2004 HEB and Decatur join consortium Jun 2004 District Department Team training Jun 2004 Campus Leadership Team training (Level I) Oct 2004 Teacher/Student Partnership Training Nov 2004 Campus Leadership Training (Level II) Jan 2005 Campus and Department Systems Checks

18. Eng III Eng II Eng I 8th8th 7th7th 6th6th 5th5th 4th4th 2nd2nd 1st1st KinderKinder Phase 1 2012 & 2013 Phase 2 2014 & 2015 Final 2016 & beyond Level II Phase-in 2016 2015 2014 2013 3rd3rd How will we ensure that our current 6 th graders are well prepared for success at the next level? How do we determine whether our kindergarten through grade 2 students are well prepared for success at the next level? Vertical/longitudinal thinking SSI in 2016

19. Tier 2: 1959 383 of 592 = 65% Level 2 (final): 1582Unsatisfactory 408 of 592 = 69%

21. 1 2 3 1 2 3 Recommended ISIP Grades K-8 January 2013 75% 20% 5% 47% 23% 30%

22. The moral imperative Ensure that all students are well prepared for success at the next level of learning This can only be accomplished by changing the learning system