Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman."— Presentation transcript:

1 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman

2 Chapter 5 Civil Liberties

3 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman Chapter Outline and Learning Objectives Roots of Civil Liberties: The Bill of Rights LO 5.1: Trace the constitutional roots of civil liberties. First Amendment Guarantees: Freedom of Religion LO 5.2: Describe the First Amendment guarantee of freedom of religion.

4 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman Chapter Outline and Learning Objectives First Amendment Guarantees: Freedoms of Speech, Press, Assembly, and Petition LO 5.3: Outline the First Amendment guarantees of freedom of speech, press, assembly, and petition. The Second Amendment: The Right to Keep and Bear Arms LO 5.4: Summarize changes in the interpretation of the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

5 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman Chapter Outline and Learning Objectives The Rights of Criminal Defendants LO 5.5: Analyze the rights of criminal defendants found in the Bill of Rights. The Right to Privacy LO 5.6: Explain the origin and significance of the right to privacy. Toward Reform: Civil Liberties and Combating Terrorism LO 5.7: Evaluate how reforms to combat terrorism have affected civil liberties.

6 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman Roots of Civil Liberties: The Bill of Rights LO 5.1: Trace the constitutional roots of civil liberties. LO 5.1: Trace the constitutional roots of civil liberties. First ten amendments to Constitution that guarantee specific rights and liberties Debate over necessity at Constitutional Convention Ninth Amendment –Not all of the people’s rights are mentioned Tenth Amendment –Rights reserved to the states or the people To Learning Objectives

7 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman The Incorporation Doctrine: The Bill of Rights Made Applicable to the States Until twentieth century Bill of Rights did not apply to states Observance of Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause forced incorporation Gitlow v. New York (1925) LO 5.1 To Learning Objectives

8 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman Selective Incorporation and Fundamental Freedoms Selective incorporation – Most but not all guarantees in Bill of Rights have been made applicable to states Selective incorporation –Palko v. Connecticut (1937) Fundamental freedoms – Rights essential to order, liberty, and justice and subject to highest standard of review LO 5.1 To Learning Objectives

9 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman Gitlow v. New York (1925) essentially overturned the precedent established in what case? A. Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) B. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) C. Barron v. Baltimore (1833) D. Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) E. Marbury v. Madison (1803) LO 5.1 To Learning Objectives

10 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman Gitlow v. New York (1925) essentially overturned the precedent established in what case? A. Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) B. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) C. Barron v. Baltimore (1833) D. Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) E. Marbury v. Madison (1803) LO 5.1 To Learning Objectives

11 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman First Amendment Guarantees: Freedom of Religion LO 5.2: Describe the First Amendment guarantee of freedom of religion. LO 5.2: Describe the First Amendment guarantee of freedom of religion. Establishment clause –Engle v. Vital (1962) –Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) Three-part Lemon test Free exercise clause –Is secular in conflict with one’s religion? Peyote use Sacrificing animals The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 2006 To Learning Objectives

12 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman The Supreme Court adheres to two concepts concerning the free exercise of religion. One (the freedom to believe) is absolute, while the other (the freedom to _____) is subject to the regulation of society. A. build a cultural center near ground zero B. meet in fellowship C. speak D. act E. write LO 5.2 To Learning Objectives

13 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman The Supreme Court adheres to two concepts concerning the free exercise of religion. One (the freedom to believe) is absolute, while the other (the freedom to _____) is subject to the regulation of society. A. build a cultural center near ground zero B. meet in fellowship C. speak D. act E. write LO 5.2 To Learning Objectives

14 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman First Amendment Guarantees: Freedoms of Speech, Press, Assembly, and Petition LO 5.3: Outline the First Amendment guarantees of and limitations on freedom of speech, press, assembly, and petition. LO 5.3: Outline the First Amendment guarantees of and limitations on freedom of speech, press, assembly, and petition. Freedoms of Speech and the Press Alien and Sedition Acts –Prior restraint Slavery, the Civil War, and rights curtailments –Gitlow v. New York (1925) World War I and anti-governmental speech –Schenck v. U.S. (1919) –Clear and present danger test –Direct incitement test To Learning Objectives

15 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman Protected Speech and Press Limiting prior restraint –New York Times v. U.S. (1971) –Nebraska press Association v. Stuart (1976) Symbolic Speech –Stromberg v. California (1931) –Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) Hate Speech –R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul (1992) LO 5.3 To Learning Objectives

16 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman Unprotected Speech and Press Libel and Slander –New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) Fighting words –Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942) –Cohen v. California (1971) Obscenity –Roth v. U.S. (1957) –Miller v. California (1973) LO 5.3 To Learning Objectives

17 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman Freedoms of Assembly and Petition DeJonge v. Oregon (1937) Most controversial freedoms, especially in times of war LO 5.3 To Learning Objectives

18 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman The Supreme Court Case New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) concerned what? A. Slander B. Libel C. Symbolic speech D. Fighting words E. Obscenity LO 5.3 To Learning Objectives

19 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman The Supreme Court Case New York Times v. Sullivan (1964) concerned what? A. Slander B. Libel C. Symbolic speech D. Fighting words E. Obscenity LO 5.3 To Learning Objectives

20 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman The Second Amendment: The Right to Keep and Bear Arms LO 5.4: Summarize changes in the interpretation of the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. LO 5.4: Summarize changes in the interpretation of the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. Originally written to protect state militias Through 1920s few regulations U.S. v. Miller (1939) –Favored regulation D.C. v. Heller (2008) –Favored gun owners To Learning Objectives

21 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman Which Supreme Court case made it difficult for Congress to regulate guns? A. Gitlow v. New York (1925) B. U.S. v. Miller (1939) C. DeJonge v. Oregon (1937) D. Barron v. Baltimore (1833) E. None of the above LO 5.4 To Learning Objectives

22 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman Which Supreme Court case made it difficult for Congress to regulate guns? A. Gitlow v. New York (1925) B. U.S. v. Miller (1939) C. DeJonge v. Oregon (1937) D. Barron v. Baltimore (1833) E. None of the above LO 5.4 To Learning Objectives

23 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman The Rights of Criminal Defendants LO 5.5: Analyze the rights of criminal defendants found in the Bill of Rights. LO 5.5: Analyze the rights of criminal defendants found in the Bill of Rights. Writs of habeas corpus, ex post facto law, bill of attainder Fourth and Fifth Amendments –Searches and seizures –Self-incrimination and double jeopardy clause –Exclusionary rule Sixth Amendment –Right to counsel and jury trials Eighth Amendment –Cruel and unusual punishment To Learning Objectives

24 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman The Fourth Amendment and Searches and Seizures Fourth Amendment – protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by federal government –Warrants – When are they needed? –Probable cause –Automobiles – When can they be searched? –Drug testing – Why is this controversial LO 5.5 To Learning Objectives

25 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman The Fifth Amendment: Self- Incrimination and Double Jeopardy Fifth Amendment –Self-incrimination –Double jeopardy –Miranda v. Arizona (1966) Exclusionary rule –Weeks v. U.S. (1914) LO 5.5 To Learning Objectives

26 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman The Sixth Amendment and the Right to Counsel and Jury Trials Right to counsel –Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) Jury trials Public and Speedy Trial LO 5.5 To Learning Objectives

27 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman The Eighth Amendment and Cruel and Unusual Punishment Cruel and unusual punishment –NAACP and the Legal Defense and Educational Fund (LDF) –Furman v. Georgia (1972) –Gregg v. Georgia (1976) –McClesky v. Zant (1991) Protecting the wrongfully accused –DNA in House v. Bell (2006) LO 5.5 To Learning Objectives

28 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman Lawyers are not permitted to select jurors on the basis of sex because of what? A. The Fifth Amendment B. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 C. The Equal Rights Amendment D. The role of political correctness E. The Equal Protection Clause LO 5.5 To Learning Objectives

29 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman Lawyers are not permitted to select jurors on the basis of sex because of what? A. The Fifth Amendment B. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 C. The Equal Rights Amendment D. The role of political correctness E. The Equal Protection Clause LO 5.5 To Learning Objectives

30 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman The Right to Privacy LO 5.6: Explain the origin and significance of the right to privacy. LO 5.6: Explain the origin and significance of the right to privacy. Birth Control –Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) Abortion –Roe v. Wade (1973) Homosexuality –Bowers v. Hardwick (1986) –Lawrence v. Texas (2003) To Learning Objectives

31 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman Gonzales v. Carhart (2007), re-confirmed which of the following? A. What most had already known B. Roe v. Wade (1973) C. Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) D. The Partial Birth Abortion Act of 2003 E. Lawrence v. Texas (2003) LO 5.6 To Learning Objectives

32 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman Gonzales v. Carhart (2007), re-confirmed which of the following? A. What most had already known B. Roe v. Wade (1973) C. Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) D. The Partial Birth Abortion Act of 2003 E. Lawrence v. Texas (2003) LO 5.6 To Learning Objectives

33 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman Toward Reform: Civil Liberties and Combating Terrorism LO 5.7: Evaluate how reforms to combat terrorism have affected civil liberties. LO 5.7: Evaluate how reforms to combat terrorism have affected civil liberties. The First Amendment –USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 The Fourth Amendment –USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 Due process rights –Habeas corpus –Sixth Amendment –Eighth Amendment To Learning Objectives

34 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman Why did those who supported holding detainees in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba claim that the United States was not bound by the Geneva Conventions? A.The detainees were “unlawful combatants” not war criminals. B.The Geneva Conventions expired after WWII. C.Executive privilege gave the United States immunity. D.Cuba is not in the United States. E.The United States can not be bound by international law if it is to effectively democratize the world. LO 5.7 To Learning Objectives

35 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman Why did those who supported holding detainees in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba claim that the United States was not bound by the Geneva Conventions? A.The detainees were “unlawful combatants” not war criminals. B.The Geneva Conventions expired after WWII. C.Executive privilege gave the United States immunity. D.Cuba is not in the United States. E.The United States can not be bound by international law if it is to effectively democratize the world. LO 5.7 To Learning Objectives

36 Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman Table 5.1: How has selective incorporation made the Bill of Rights applicable to the states? Back To Learning Objectives


Download ppt "Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Longman."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google