Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

EFFECT OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE AS AN ADJUVANT TO EPIDURAL ROPIVACAINE 0.75%

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "EFFECT OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE AS AN ADJUVANT TO EPIDURAL ROPIVACAINE 0.75%"— Presentation transcript:

1 EFFECT OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE AS AN ADJUVANT TO EPIDURAL ROPIVACAINE 0.75%
TOPIC EFFECT OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE AS AN ADJUVANT TO EPIDURAL ROPIVACAINE 0.75% DR.Rajaram MD(Final)

2 NAME : DR.J.RAJARAM COURSE : MD FINAL(ANESTHESIA) CENTER : KILPAUK MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL GUIDE : DR.P.S.SHANMUGAM MD.DA PROF & HOD OF ANESTHESIA DEPT OF ANESTHESIA KILPAUK MEDICAL COLLEGE

3 INTRODUCTION Hypothesis of this study is to evaluate and compare the effect of added dexmedetomidine to epidural ropivacaine 0.75% 40 patients under going elective lower limb orthopedic procedures under epidural were selected and divided into two groups of 20 each Control group- epidural ropivacaine 0.75% 20ml (150mg) Dex group- epidural ropivacaine 0.75% 20ml (150mg) + Dexmedetomidine 1μg/kg

4 METHODS Ethical committee approval Informed consent
Randomised double blind study 40 paients under going elective orthopedic procedures were selected Absolute fasting of 8 hours , without premedication

5 METHODS ALLERGY TO LOCAL ANESTHETICS NM DISEASES USING α2 ANTAGONISTS
INCLUSION CRITERIA EXCLUSION CRITERIA ASA I & II BOTH SEXES AGE BETWEEN yrs ELECTIVE ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURE UNDER EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA WITHOUT COMORBID ILLNESS ALLERGY TO LOCAL ANESTHETICS NM DISEASES USING α2 ANTAGONISTS WEIGHT MORE THAN 120 kg

6 CONTD.. I.V line secured for administration of RL,10ml/kg/hr
Monitors include pulse oximetry, NIBP, ECG Epidural Performed with 16G Tuohy needle Lumbar epidural space Sitting position Loss of resistance technique

7 GROUPS CONTROL GROUP(N=20) : DXMEDETOMIDINE GROUP(N=20) :
Epidural ropivacaine 0.75% 20ml(150mg)+1 ml NS DXMEDETOMIDINE GROUP(N=20) : Epidural ropivacaine 0.75% 20ml(150mg)+ Dexmedetomidine 1μg/kg+NS to complete 1ml 20ml 0.75% injected at the rate of 1ml/3sec Patients were treated with titrated doses ephedrine 6mg if systolic BP<90mmhg, with atropine 0.6mg if HR<60/min Patients were sedated on demand basis

8 VARIABLES BLOCK ONSET TIME MAXIMUM DERMATOMAL LEVEL OF ANESTHESIA
DURATION OF SENSORY AND MOTOR BLOCKADE MOTOR BLOCK INTENSITY-BROMAGE MOTOR SCALE SENSORY BLOCK-SENSORY SCALE LEVEL OF SEDATION-RAMSEY SEDATION SCALE HEMODYNAMICS DURATION POST OPERATIVE ANALGESIA-VAS SCORE

9 DEFINITION OF VARIABLES
SENSORY BLOCK ONSET TIME Time interval between end of anesthetic injection and appearance of cutaneous analgesia in dermatomes T-12,T-10,T-8,T-6 DURATION OF MOTOR BLOCK Administration of anesthetic and attainment of grade 0 in Bromage motor scale DURATION OF ANALGESIA Administration of anesthetic and disappearance of cutaneous level at each dermatomal level POST-OP ANALGESIA DURATION Administration of anesthetic and time of analgesic usage in PACU SUPPLEMENTAL SEDATION If patient felt pain or uncomfortable , with pentazocine 0.3mg/kg and or midazolam 0.02mg I.V

10 BROMAGE MOTOR SCALE GRADE CRITERIA DEGREE OF BLOCK
FREE MOVEMENT OF LEGS AND FEET NIL(0%) 1 JUST ABLE TO FLEX KNEES WITH FREE MOVEMENT OF KNEES PARTIAL(33%) 2 UNABLE TO FLEX KNEES,BUT WITH MOVEMNT OF FEET ALMOST COMPLETE (66%) 3 UNABLE TO MOVE LEGS OR FEET COMPLETE (100%)

11 RAMSEY SEDATION SCALE

12 SENSORY SCORE SCORE RESPONSE NORMAL SENSATION 1
NORMAL SENSATION 1 ANALGESIA(LOSS OF PIN PRICK SENSATION) 2 ANESTHESIA(LOSS OF TOUCH)

13 STATISTICS Variables were analyzed with Student ‘t’ test, Chi Square test Variables like age, sex, weight, height were compared using Levene’s test for equality of variance Sample size obtained according to previous background study ‘p’ value less than 0.05 was taken as significant

14 RESULTS One patient in control group was excluded for failure of epidural block and need for GA Distributions of age, weight, height, sex and type of surgery , duration of surgery between groups(p>0.05) Block onset time T-12,T-10,T-8,T6 between groups-shortened onset time, with less significance(p<0.08) Regression time is prolonged in dex group(p<0.01) Maximal level of analgesia assessed after 60mins between groups were T-4 to T-6, without significance

15 Block Onset Time Regression Time

16 Upper Level Of Analgesia

17 SEX DISTRIBUTION

18 DISTRIBUTION OF SURGERY

19 EPIDURAL CATHETER LENGTH

20 VARIABLES CONTROL DEX Age 42.25 39.10 Sex Female 3 4 Male 17 16 Height (cm) 169.35 163.15 Weight (kg) 69.95 66.75 Level Of Epidural L1-L2 2 L2-L3 10 L3-L4 8 Cathetar Length (cm) 6.5 6.85 Surgery IM / IL Nailing 9 Illizarao ring fixation DHS 5 TKR 1 THR DCS Encirclage / TBW L Patella Plate & Screw fixation Hemiarthroplasty ASA I 12 15 II DURATION OF SURGERY (mins) 158.25 177

21 CONTD.. Duration of analgesia-prolonged in Dex group, level of significance-(p<0.05) Motor block duration-prolonged in Dex group, level of significance(p<0.05) Intensity of motor block-increased intensity in dex group,without significance(p<0.37) Supplemental sedation-reduced need in Dex group , level of significance Patient given supplemental mask O2 if SpO2 <94% Duration of post-op analgesia-significantly prolonged in Dex group, level of significance (p<0.01)

22 Block Onset Time (T-12)mins 13.90 12.45 0.085
VARIABLES CONTROL DEX ‘P’ VALUE Block Onset Time (T-12)mins 13.90  12.45   0.085 Duration Of Analgesia (mins)  236.35 304.25   0.021 Regression Time  115.55  177.30  0.051 Motor Block Duration (mins)  204.65 248.00  0.042  Post Of Analgesia (mins ) 309   496.95 0.001 

23

24 Contd.. Need for vasopressors- similar between groups with out much significance(p>0.13) Occurrence of hypotension with need for vasopressor Occurrence of bradycardia and need for vagolytic Hemodynamic stability-stable in both groups without much significance(p<0.06) Occurrence of other complications like shivering, nausea , RS depression in intra and post-op period – similar between groups Epidural catheter was used for giving rescue analgesia with 0.2% ropivacaine 10ml (20mg)

25 SEDATIVE USAGE

26 ROPIVACAINE

27 ROPIVACAINE It is a long acting amide local anesthetics
Ropivacaine is ‘S’ isomer of the propyl analogue of mepivacaine and bupivacaine Similar to bupivacaine ,but with better cadiotoxicity profile, dissociates from Na+channels more rapidly Produces less accumulation of Na+channel block Significantly better sensory-motor differentiation,due to lower lipid solubility than bupivacaine Has mild intrinsic vasoconstricting properties unsuitable for infiltration in tissues without collateral blood supply Reason for longer cutaneous anesthesia

28 PROPERTIES-ROPIVACAINE
pKa is 8.07 Protein binding is 94% Partition co-efficient is 115 CC:CNS ratio is 5:1 Potency 4

29 DISCUSSION According to result,
There is a synergistic interaction of dex and ropivacaine during epidural administration Addition of Dex prolongs analgesic and motor blockade duration and post-op analgesia Decreases the requirement of supplemental sedation It does not affect onset time

30 DEXMEDETOMIDINE

31

32 DEXMEDETOMIDINE Dex is an agonist of α2 adrenergic receptor – agonist where ratio among α2 : α1 is 1600:1 Dex epidural effect is dose dependent and superior than I.V due to its high affinity for α2 adrenergic receptors in spinal cord Dex first administered epidurally in 1997, combined with 1.5% lignocaine for patients undergoing hystrectomy 8 times greater selectivity than clonidine towards α2 adrenergic receptor

33 DEX.. After epidural administration of Dex , it is rapidly detected in CSF within five mins,however only 22% is absorbed into intra thecal space Dex inhibition of locus caeruleus results in disinhibition of of NA nuclei and exerts descending inhibitory effect on nociception in spical cord Anti-nociceptive effect is Dose dependent Related to affinity of located α2 in spinal card Higher lipid solubility Prolonged analgesic action of LA is due to Reduced systemic absorbtion caused by local vasoconstriction mediated byα2C in smooth muscle of epidural venous plexus

34 DEX.. Sedative effect of Dex,
Mediated by binding to α2A receptors in locus caeruleus Diminishes release of norepinephrine During epidural administration cephalad spread into meninges may be responsible for sedation Dex cause more sensory than motor block duration 4 times the dose is required for inhibition large ,myelinated Aα fibers when compared to small unmyelinated C fibers Bradycardia Is dose dependent Occurs in epidural if level is higher Shivering incidence may be reduced with α2 agonists due to central inhibition of thermoregulatory centre

35 CONCLUSION DEX has significant synergistic interaction with epidural Ropivacaine in Prolonging duration of analgesia(p<0.02) Prolonging duration motor block(p<0.04) Post-op duration of analgesia(p<0.001) Ref. brazilia scandinavia ,journal

36 THANK U


Download ppt "EFFECT OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE AS AN ADJUVANT TO EPIDURAL ROPIVACAINE 0.75%"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google