Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Richard Stutt Nik Cunniffe Erik DeSimone Matt Castle Chris Gilligan February 2012.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Richard Stutt Nik Cunniffe Erik DeSimone Matt Castle Chris Gilligan February 2012."— Presentation transcript:

1 Richard Stutt Nik Cunniffe Erik DeSimone Matt Castle Chris Gilligan February 2012

2  Example results from landscape-scale models ◦ SOD in California (precursor to this model) ◦ SOD in UK  How the model works ◦ Host landscape ◦ Environmental conditions ◦ Pathogen dispersal  Uses of the model ◦ Predictions of spread ◦ Effects of control

3

4

5

6  Key components: ◦ Host ◦ Environment ◦ Pathogen dynamics and dispersal  Expressed as a compartmental model

7  Susceptible hosts in the landscape are divided into a metapopulation at a chosen resolution (250m)  UK Sudden Oak death landscape assembled from: ◦ National Inventory of Woodland Trees (NIWT) ◦ Forestry Commission commercial Larch data ◦ Maximum Entropy suitability models for Rhododendron and Vaccinium (FERA/JNCC)  Different hosts have different weightings for sporulation and susceptibility

8 Broadleaved Young TreesFelled Coniferous

9

10  Identify favourable conditions for P. ramorum ◦ moisture ◦ temperature  Parameterise using experimental results Relative Sporulation Temperature

11  Calculate underlying suitability of locations in the landscape  Statistical used to model future conditions

12  Dispersal kernel is a statistical description of transport of inoculum between locations  Implicitly incorporates many mechanisms

13  Fit model using historic spread data  Used Maximum Likelihood to assess goodness of fit  Predicted probability of infection by 2010 given starting conditions in 2004 Survey Positive for P. ramorum Survey Negative for P. ramorum

14  Prediction in the absence of control  Effect of controls ◦ Felling infected stands ◦ Felling infected stands + proactive control  Effect of any delay in implementing control  Application to surveying for P. Ramorum

15

16

17

18

19

20 Total Infection Symptomatic Symptomatic at time of Survey

21 Total Infection Symptomatic Symptomatic at time of Survey

22 Total Infection Symptomatic Symptomatic at time of Survey

23 Total Infection Symptomatic Symptomatic at time of Survey

24

25 Examine region of South Wales

26 Cull: no delay after survey 6 month delay

27  Key Questions When Surveying for Disease: ◦ Where is the disease likely to be? ◦ Where is it likely to be most severe and spread most rapidly? ◦ How to optimise the sampling?

28  Uses: Currently known outbreaks Predicted severity of outbreaks => Sampling weighting  Survey pattern formed => sampling from weightings  Map shows a weighting and a set of survey points (green)

29  Continue to improve the model  Refinement of country wide strategies:  Region specific control  Effect of non compliance  User friendly models

30  Frank van den Bosch, Stephen Parnell ◦ Rothamsted Research  Forestry Commission, FERA ◦ (in particular Bruce Rothnie and Keith Walters)  Funding from DEFRA, BBSRC and USDA


Download ppt "Richard Stutt Nik Cunniffe Erik DeSimone Matt Castle Chris Gilligan February 2012."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google