1. Researchers’ needs : understand how they work to implement a EU-RAN Frédérique Cornuau, University of Lille Roxane Silberman, CNRS/Réseau Quetelet director EDAF, Luxembourg, 24 th – 25 th of March 2015

2. Introduction Currently :  More and more researchers want to use very detailed data  but especially at national level Future :  Develop transnational access to data  Build a EU-RAN Our study : researchers’ needs  when using confidential micro data  using remote access  through a secure system

3. Our survey : a methodology in three steps StepDescriptionSampleGoals 1Business case Exploratory approach (2012) One international research team (D, F, NL, UK) Identify major obstacles for European research projects based on micro-data 2On-line survey Quantitative approach (February 2013) 65 researchers who experienced RA, In 5 RDCs, DwB partners D, F, NL, UK -further explore 4 phases of a research project -further explore the impact of various technical modes and security constraints on data processing -identify the more specific difficulties in the case of transnational access 3Interviews Qualitative approach (May 2014) 2 individual interviews 20 researchers in 2 workshops (CASD, France and CBS, The Netherlands) -understand how researchers work together, when in teams -imagine how they would work with the EU-RAN

4. Requirement n°1 : reduce waiting time throughout the process Too long to wait for accreditation Several steps between accreditation and real access (example : enrolment) Lengthy delays to obtain outputs checking Outputs checking too long for one third of the researchers « such delay is not convenient for quality research », « … any waiting just to learn that the program crashed is very frustrating »

5. Requirement n°2 : no travel to access points WHY ?  Time consuming  Financial cost  Organizational problem  No Interaction or discussion between researchers  No usual documentation at hand  Discriminating « It would be possible to do more with the research with accessibility from my desktop computer in the office. »

6. Requirement n°3 : a more flexible access point in the case of mobility In case of short term mobility, a researcher is unable to resume data processing instantly in order to modify or test new models or refine the analysis In case of long-term mobility, researchers have to ask for a new accreditation "I wish the box could be usable from several locations"

7. Requirement n°4 : be able to access one’s own research environment Less than 1 out of 10 could work with their own computer  often problematic BECAUSE :  need for specific software not provided by the secure center  transfer of programs can take time  communication with other colleagues is difficult  no web access

8. Requirement n°5 : improve data documentation and support Poor quality of documentation is an issue “clear and up-to-date documentation, standard format for standard variables (e.g. time variables, geographical units id, etc.) Need for a reactive human support (hot lines, ….) “sometimes it would be easier to explain the problem orally», « The hot-line could be made more efficient by providing, for example, a specific contact address per project or specific addresses for each kind of services (input, output, IT technical support, data technical support, accounting, etc.). » Language issue is particularly important too : which language(s) for documentation?

9. Requirement n°6 : output checking is an essential issue Fewer technical and methodological restrictions pertaining to outputs Discuss or compare either final outputs or intermediary outputs « it’s particularly a problem when you work with external people “major problem is that an RA may run a program and can look at the output (complete, which is necessary for checking), but is prevented from showing it to an off-location researcher. » ;

10. Requirement n°7 : merging data : an opportunity for new research International comparative analysis = new research opportunities  Need to be able to merge data

11. Conclusion Researchers want to work :  FASTER  in ANYPLACE  with their WORKSPACE  in a COLLABORATIVE way WHILE respecting security issues

12. Thanks for Listening Website: http://www.dwbproject.org/http://www.dwbproject.org/