Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Final project – Computational Biology

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Final project – Computational Biology"— Presentation transcript:

1 Final project – Computational Biology
Identifying transcription factories not involved in pre-mRNA splicing בהנחיית: מר יהודה ברודי ד"ר ירון שב-טל מגישים: ניסים נעים עדי פוטוק

2 Introduction There is evidence of transcription factories
which contain accumulations of RNA polymerase II. Genes are moving towards the factories in order to be transcribed.

3 Introduction Splicing is a co-transcriptional modification of an mRNA,
in which introns are removed and exons are joined. U1 and U2 are parts of the spliceosome machinery.

4 Project goal Identification and classification of transcription factories, and categorizing the factories by their probability to undergo splicing.

5 Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization
RNA FISH mRNA Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization Using a labeled oligonucleotide probe to detect a specific mRNA of interest. Immunofluorescence Using a fluorescent labeled antibody to detect U1snRNA, U1snRNA and RNA polymerase II.

6 Wide-Field Microscopy
The cells are illuminated with light of a certain wavelength and emit light of a different wavelength. This technique is used to acquire 3D images of a specimen. Each image is composed of several 2D layers.

7 Deconvolution Problem: The light emitted from the fluorescent
molecules disperses, as the layer gets farther away from the molecules. Solution: this method is used to focus the light back to its original source, in order to create an image more similar to the original image.

8 Deconvolution Before After

9 Image analysis IMARIS – Tool for analyzing images
Wide graphical abilities. Embedded link to MATLAB programs.

10 Gene constructs: e1 and e3
e1 gene: no splicing e3 gene: undergoes splicing

11 Splicing factors can be identified at the site of transcription
Splicing is co-transcriptional Splicing factors can be identified at the site of transcription snRNAU2 U2 snRNA snRNAU1 U1 snRNA MS2 MS2 e3 Transcription site U1 snRNA Nucleoplasm snRNAU1 snRNAU2 U2 snRNA U2 snRNA U1 snRNA MS2 Transcription site e1 U1 snRNA Nucleoplasm U2 snRNA

12 Splicing factors can be identified at the site of transcription
Splicing is co-transcriptional Splicing factors can be identified at the site of transcription snRNAU1

13 RNA pol II Immunofluorescence
Cytoplasm Nucleolus Nucleoplasm Transcription factory

14 Step I – Identify Factories
Use “dynamic threshold” to intensify the areas with high values, compared with their surroundings. Dynamic threshold Intensity of pixels in the image

15 Step I – Identify Factories
Locate the centers of these areas

16 Step I – Identify Factories
Expand each center to the whole factory area

17 Step I – Identify Factories
Use the “find connected components” function to differentiate between factories.

18 e3 transcription factory
LacI mRNA RNA Pol II

19 e3 transcription factory
RNA pol II and mRNA molecules surrounding the gene mRNA molecules surrounding the gene

20 Step II – Calculate Correlation
Normalization of the U1 and U2 images. Correction of pixel shift.

21 Step II – Calculate Correlation
We tried several methods to calculate correlation: Pearson coefficient average of U1 / average of U2 curve fit (aX + b)

22 Current results Normalized count Normalized count U1 / U2 U1 / U2

23 Step III – classifying factories
The best method to divide the factories into two distinct groups, is …. Consensus correlation similar to that of e3 gene  high probability of undergoing splicing. Different / No consensus correlation  low probability of undergoing splicing.

24 The final output Using color gradient to color factories according to the probability of undergoing splicing.

25 Biological conclusions
A few hundreds of transcription factories in each nucleus, as mentioned in articles from recent years. ? Do factories tend to gather, or do they operate throughout the nucleus. ? Do active factories concentrate in the center of the nucleus.

26 What’s next? Improve factory identification (more automatically).
Displaying each factory as an individual object in IMARIS. Analyze more images of e1 and e3 genes, to find the differences between their factories. Check the correlation of U1 and U4 factors.

27 Thanks Dr. Yaron Shav-Tal Mr. Yehuda Brody


Download ppt "Final project – Computational Biology"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google