1. Impact of Information Society on the Sustainable Development: Global and Regional Aspects Prof. M. Zgurovsky, National Technical University of Ukraine “Kiev Polytechnic Institute” “Kiev Polytechnic Institute” www.ntu-kpi.kiev.uawww.ntu-kpi.kiev.ua e-mail: zgurovsm@hotmail.com Plan 1. The Concept of Sustainable Development 2. Calculations of the Index of Sustainable Development 3. Impact of Information Society on the Sustainable Development 4. Conclusions 4. Conclusions

2. “System coordination of economic, ecological and human development in such a way that the quality and safety of life should not decrease from one generation to another. The environmental conditions should not worsen and the social progress should meet the needs of every person.” the needs of every person. ” Came from: Vladimir Vernadsky (1922) Fig.1. The Concept of sustainable development

3. Ecological I e = I es = ESI Economic I ec = F(I c,I ef ) Social I s = F(I q,I hd,I ks ) IsIs IeIe IecIec Fig.2. Global dimensions of sustainable development I sd

4. Measure of sustainable development Global index Constituents (49 indicators, 188 datasets) Source Economic (Іec) Ic - Growth competitiveness index 3 indicators, 47 sets of data World Economic Forum [www.weforum.org] I ef – Economic freedom index 10 indicators, 50 sets of data Heritage Foundation [www.heritage.org] Ecological (Іе) I es – Environmental Sustainability Index 21 indicators, 76 sets of data Yale University, USA [www.yale.edu/esi] Social (Іs) І q – Quality-of-life index 9 indicatorsEconomist Intelligence Unit [www.en.wikipedia.org] І hd – Human development index 3 indicatorsUnited Nation Development program [www.hdr.undp.org] I ks – Knowledge society index 3 indicators, 15 sets of data UNDESA, [UN, NE.04.C.1.2005]

5. Total: 49 indicators; 188 databases Fig.3. Mathematical model of sustainable development (Model 1) Economic dimension 13 indicators 97 datasets Ecological dimension 21 indicators 76 datasets Social dimension 15 indicators 15 datasets

6. RankingCountry GGP per capita by the parity of purchasing capacity (thous. dol. USA) Index of sustainable development Index of the economic measure Index of the ecological measure Index of the social measure 1Finland29,6500,7860,5670,7510,802 2Iceland41,8040,7800,5610,7080,839 3Sweden30,5900,7740,5380,7170,84 4Norway39,5900,7550,4880,7340,829 5Switzerland33,5800,7380,5380,6370,82 6Luxemburg69,7370,7380,5580,6180,816 7Denmark32,4900,7310,5630,5820,828 8Canada34,1500,7200,5250,6440,777 9Ireland36,7900,7160,5590,5920,779 10Australia31,0100,7160,5320,610,792 11New Zealand25,1100,7130,5260,610,79 12Austria31,4200,7080,5040,6270,785 13USA41,5290,6950,5620,530,779 14Germany28,2500,6870,510,570,777 15The Netherlands30,9200,6840,5240,5370,787

7. 16Japan30,7500,6800,480,5730,793 17England31,1500,6740,5430,5020,773 18Estonia14,8000,6620,5330,5820,658 19Uruguay8,8690,6470,3820,7180,659 20Chile12,1200,6420,5110,5360,678 21France30,6400,6410,4380,5520,754 22Spain25,3700,6260,4550,4880,758 23Israel21,3100,6230,4540,5090,725 24Latvia11,8620,6180,420,6040,649 25Belgium30,6600,6150,4680,4440,755 26Italy27,9600,6130,4110,5010,759 27Kosta Rika9,0000,6070,3720,5960,685 28 Czech Republic17,6000,6020,4590,4660,703 29Slovakia15,5130,6010,4280,5280,673 30Hungary16,0470,6010,4240,520,686 31Croatia11,8700,5960,3670,5950,661 32Korea23,3600,5910,4440,430,729

8. 33Malaysia10,4500,5900,4130,540,643 34Greece22,3400,5860,3920,5010,703 35Panama6,7600,5830,3630,5770,646 36Brazil8,7600,5810,3470,6220,61 37Columbia7,3300,5650,350,5890,597 38Poland12,8250,5590,4010,450,667 39Bulgaria8,6640,5490,3650,50,628 40Mexico10,0000,5460,3730,4620,649 41Tunis7,9100,5440,370,5180,586 42Bolivia3,6800,5420,3220,5950,556 43Romania6.1050.5190.340.4620.616 44Russia9.81 0.5.150.3190.5610.52 45Moldova2,2800,5060,330,5120,529 46Trinidad11,7200,5000,3910,3630,599 47Ukraine6,5000,4850,3190,4470,554 48Egypt3,9300,4840,3370,440,535

9. №DescriptionWeighting coefficients А. Index of the knowledge society (Iks) 1 Years of scooling 0.066 2 Yong population 0.066 3 Newspapers per 1000 pop. 0.066 4 Internet users per 10000 pop. 0.066 5 Main Phone Liners per 100 pop. 0.066 6 Call Phones per 100 pop. 0.066 7 R&D Expenditure (% of GDP) 0.066 8 Pupils per teacher 0.066 9 Gini Index 0.066 Q ks =0.60 B. Growth Competetiveness Index (Ic) 10 Call Phones per 100 pop. 0.050 11 Internet users per 10000 pop. 0.050 12 Internet hosts per 10000 pop. 0.050 13 Main Phone Liners per 100 pop. 0.050 1414 Personal Computers per 100 pop. 0.050 Q c =0.25

10. Fig. 4. Estimation of the information society impact on sustainable development (Model 2) Growth competitiveness index ( I c ) Knowledge society index ( I ks )

11. RankingCountry Index of sust. develop- ment (Іsd) Index of economic dimension (Іec) Index of ecological dimension (Іe) Index of social dimension (Іs) Impact of IS on sust. develop- ment % 1Denmark0.7310.5630.5820.82811.046 2Japan0.6800.4800.5730.79310.847 3Great Britain0.6740.5430.5020.77310.808 4Germany0.6870.5100.5700.77710.682 5Israel0.6230.4540.5090.72510.664 6Netherlands0.6840.5240.5370.78710.614 7Belgium0.6150.4680.4440.75510.606 8Sweden0.7740.5380.7170.84010.545 9USA0.6950.5620.5300.77910.496 10France0.6410.4380.5520.75410.343 11Switzerland0.7370.5380.6370.82010.298 12Iceland0.7800.5610.7080.83910.289

12. 13New Zealand0.7130.5260.6100.79010.247 14Austria0.7080.5040.6270.78510.213 15Czech Republic0.6020.4590.4660.70310.210 16Spain0.6260.4550.4880.75810.149 17Norway0.7550.4880.7340.82910.128 18Finland0.7860.5670.7510.8029.968 19Poland0.5590.4010.4500.6679.892 20Hungary0.6010.4240.5200.6869.879 21Luxemburg0.7350.5570.6180.8159.833 22Tunis0.5440.3700.5180.5869.820 23Italy0.6120.4110.5010.7599.763 24Malaysia0.5890.4130.5400.6439.741 25Slovakia0.6020.4280.5280.6739.698 26Australia0.7160.5320.6100.7929.692 27Canada0.7210.5250.6440.7779.502 28Romania0.5190.3400.4620.6168.781 29Egypt0.4820.3370.4400.5289.399

13. 30Mexico0.5450.3730.4620.6499.394 31Costa Rikа0.6060.3720.5960.6859.348 32Greece0.5860.3920.5010.7039.340 33Estonia0.6620.5330.5820.6589.296 34Bulgaria0.5490.3650.5000.6289.288 35Chile0.6420.5110.5360.6789.272 36Latvia0.6180.4200.6040.6499.183 37Croatia0.5960.3670.5950.6619.031 38Moldova0.5060.3300.5120.5298.996 39Ukraine0.4860.3190.4470.5548.996 40Trinidad0.5000.3910.3630.5998.955 41Panama0.5830.3630.5770.6468.928 42Ireland0.7170.5590.5920.7798.784 43Russia0.5150.3190.5610.5208.618 44Uruguay0.6480.3820.7180.6598.358 45Columbia0.5660.3500.5890.5978.189 46Brazil0.5810.3470.6220.6107.850

14. RankingCountry Index of sustainable development (Іsd) Index of economic dimension (Іec) Index of ecological dimens. (Іe) Index of social dimens. (Іs) Impact of IS on sustainable development % 1 Denmark 0.7310.5630.5820.82811.046 2 Sweden 0.7740.5380.7170.84010.545 4 Switzerland 0.7370.5380.6370.82010.298 3 Iceland 0.7800.5610.7080.83910.289 5 Norway 0.7550.4880.7340.82910.128 7 Finland 0.7860.5670.7510.8029.968 6 Luxemburg 0.7350.5570.6180.8159.833 8 Australia 0.7160.5320.6100.7929.692 9 Canada 0.7210.5250.6440.7779.502 10 Ireland 0.7170.5590.5920.7798.784

15. Rank ing Index of sustainable development (Іsd) Index of economic dimension (Іec) Index of ecological dimension (Іe) Index of social dimension (Іs) Impact of IS on sustainable development % 1 Japan 0.6800.4800.5730.79310.847 2 Great Britain 0.6740.5430.5020.77310.808 3 Germany 0.6870.5100.5700.77710.682 4 USA 0.6950.5620.5300.77910.496 5 France 0.6410.4380.5520.75410.343 6 Italy 0.6120.4110.5010.7599.763 7 Canada 0.7210.5250.6440.7779.502 8 Russia 0,5150,3190,5610,5206,360 Country

16. RankingCountry Index of sustainable development (Іsd) Index of economic dimension (Іec) Index of ecologic al dimens. (Іe) Index of social dimens. (Іs) Impact of IS on sustainab. develop. (%) 1Czech Republic0.6020.4590.4660.70310.210 2Poland0.5590.4010.4500.6679.892 3Slovak Republic0.6020.4280.5280.6739.698 5Estonia0.6620.5330.5820.6589.296 6Bulgaria0.5490.3650.5000.6289.288 7Latvia0.6180.4200.6040.6499.183 8Croatia0.5960.3670.5950.6619.031 9Moldova0.5060.3300.5120.5298.996 10Ukraine0.4860.3190.4470.5548.996 4Romania0.5190.3400.4620.6169.498

17. Groups of countries Average Impact (%)) Correlation between Fis and Isd Correlation between Corruption Perception and Isd 1234 46 countries9,711K FI =0,870,916 G810,132K FI =0,7830,833 Smart countries 10,008K FI =0,7370,707 Post Sov. Countries 9,409K FI =0,9850,904

18. Conclusions (Fig. 5) The new sustainable development measuring system (metric) was worked out as a new tool for investigation. This tool allows to receive the quantitative estimations of the sustainable development process depending on the groups of economic, ecological and social indicators and datasets. The new sustainable development measuring system (metric) was worked out as a new tool for investigation. This tool allows to receive the quantitative estimations of the sustainable development process depending on the groups of economic, ecological and social indicators and datasets. The impact of information society on sustainable development was studied on the global and regional scale based on the sustainable development mathematical model. The impact of information society on sustainable development was studied on the global and regional scale based on the sustainable development mathematical model. The created tool allows to develop the recommendations regarding the ways of improving the standards of life quality and safety in particular countries and regions of the world by the advance of information society and competitive growth parameters. The created tool allows to develop the recommendations regarding the ways of improving the standards of life quality and safety in particular countries and regions of the world by the advance of information society and competitive growth parameters.