Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area."— Presentation transcript:

1 Industrial Air Quality Monitoring

2 Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area

3 Grab Sampling Measure the concentration of an airborne substance over a short time period (e.g. less than 5 minutes) Effective as a screening technique to determine if more extensive monitoring is warranted Not usually used to calculate TWA values, since sample times are rarely representative

4 Integrated Sampling a.k.a. Continuous Sampling Used to estimate 8-hour and 15-minute TWA exposures by collecting one or more samples over the duration of the task period “Integrates” the various concentrations to which the worker has been exposed

5 Personal Sampling Preferred method of evaluating worker exposure to airborne chemicals Worker wears sampling device that collects sample wherever worker is, whatever they’re doing Aperture should be as close as possible to breathing zone (hemisphere in front of the shoulders with radius of 6-9 inches)

6 Area Sampling Evaluate background concentrations associated with a place (rather than with a worker) Effective in investigating suspected leaks or “hot spots” Not usually used to calculate TWA values, since the location is rarely representative of worker’s breathing zone

7 Collection Devices Direct reading Evacuated containers Absorption Adsorption Filters Passive vs. active

8 Direct Reading Provide “immediate” indication of concentration Example: Colorimetric (“stain”) indicator tubes (“Draeger tubes”) Electronic sensors available for some gases

9

10 Evacuated Containers Reverse aerosol can Plastic sampling bags

11

12 Absorption Gas or vapor passed through absorbing liquid (e.g. acid vapors through deionized water) Effective with reactive, soluble compounds Absorption efficiency must be considered when calculating concentration in air from concentration in absorbent liquid

13 Adsorption Alternative for insoluble or nonreactive gases Solid sorbent (such as granular activated carbon or silica gel) provides sites to which contaminant molecules are attracted through van der Waals forces Carbon adsorption tubes one of the most commonly used active collectors

14 Anatomy of an Adsorption Tube Charcoal made from coconut shell: large adsorptive surface area and nonpolar (so it prefers organic vapors rather than water &c) Standard tube 7cm long by 4 mm wide –1 st section contains 100 mg charcoal and a fiberglass, glass wool, or urethane foam plug –2 nd section (“backup”) contains 50 mg charcoal to detect “breakthrough”: > 10% back/front

15 Filters Commonly used for particulates Filter material chosen based upon analysis: –Weight (total particulates within capture range) –Chemical composition (need material that dissolves or ashes to permit analysis) –Size categorization (translucence to permit microscopy for particle sizing and counting)

16 Passive vs. Active Monitoring Passive monitors allow personal sampling without pumps Rely on diffusion (movement across concentration gradient Example: Organic vapor monitor Active monitors use pumps to move air through collection device

17

18 Analytical Methods Sources of error –Determinate error (bias) –Indeterminate error (random)

19 On-site Analysis Stain (indicator) tubes Direct reading instruments

20 Laboratory Analysis Gas Chromatography –Thermal Conductivity Detector –Flame Ionization Detector –Electron Capture Detector Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry –IR, Visible, UV

21


Download ppt "Industrial Air Quality Monitoring. Sampling Protocols Grab vs. Integrated Personal vs. Area."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google