1. www.forensic.gov.uk © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. The Forensic Science Service ® is a trading name of Forensic Science Service Ltd Forensic Science Service Ltd. is a UK Government owned company INVESTIGATION OF CHILD POISONING What Can Forensic Toxicology Offer? Michael Scott-Ham Senior Forensic Scientist Forensic Science Service, London Laboratory www.forensic.gov.uk

2. 2 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. OUTLINE OF TALK Samples required Drugs analysed Detection times Analysis Interpretation Case examples

3. 3 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. 3 SPECIMENS REQUIRED FROM LIVING SUBJECTS Urine (10 to 20 millilitres normally required) Blood (5 to 10 millilitres normally required) Hair(If long-term abuse is suspected) Samples must be taken as soon as practically possible. (A doctor is not necessarily required for urine samples.)

4. 4 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. 4 REQUIREMENTS FOR TOX SAMPLES Blood and urine need to be preserved and well sealed. Glass universal bottles/Medex ® Vials/RTA Vials/Vacutainers preferable. Preservatives - fluoride, oxalate Samples should be refrigerated or frozen (frozen if volatiles are suspected). Hair Sampling – follow Hair Testing Protocol. Items suitably sealed and labeled for continuity. Date and time the sample was taken – important for result interpretation. Continuity statement likely to be required later by Police Each sample given a unique exhibit number. Use of Forensic Evidence Bags (e.g. SceneSafe ® )

5. 5 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. INFORMATION REQUIRED BY TOX Paperwork documenting case circumstances and continuity of items. Information regarding type and duration of patient symptoms. Immediate family prescription/drug use information. Suspected drugs/Alcohol? Timescale of incident – one off event/suspected long-term abuse

6. 6 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. 6 LABORATORY PROCEDURE Alcohol Common Drugs of Abuse Amphetamine, methylenedioxymethylamphetamine (MDMA) and other associated ‘Ecstasy’ type drugs. Compounds expected following the use of cocaine. Methadone, ketamine, diazepam and temazepam. Opiate drugs (e.g. heroin, morphine, codeine and dihydrocodeine). Compounds expected following the use of cannabis or cannabis resin. Medicinal Drugs – tests carried out for basic, acidic and neutral drugs. includes various antihistamine, antipsychotic and antidepressant drugs, SSRI’s, common analgesics. As much information as possible required to assist with targeted testing.

7. 7 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. LABORATORY PROCEDURE CONT. Sedative Drugs Gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) and gammabutyrolactone (GBL). Benzodiazepine drugs including flunitrazepam, diazepam, temazepam, lorazepam, lormetazepam, flurazepam, midazolam, alprazolam and clonazepam. Zopiclone, zolpidem and zaleplon. Barbiturates. Chlorinated compounds - chloral hydrate (‘Welldorm ® ’).

8. 8 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. 8 DETECTION TIMES DETECTION TIMES FOR DRUGS ARE LONGER IN URINE THAN IN BLOOD. e.g. for drugs of abuse Blood Generally 12 to 24 hours. Urine Generally 24 to 72 hours. Detection times for prescription medication vary.

9. 9 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. DETECTION LIMITS Alcohol – eliminated from an adult body at a constant rate of between 10 and 25mg% per hour. N.B Elimination rate in children may be faster. Common drugs of abuse BloodUrine Amphetamine12 hours1-2 days ‘Ecstasy’18 hours2-3 days Cocaine18 hours2-3 days Heroin/morphine12 hours1-2 days Ketamine6 - 12 hours12 - 24 hours Cannabis/cannabis resin depends on pattern of use

10. 10 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. DETECTION LIMITS CONT. Prescribed/abused drugsBloodUrine Diazepam, temazepam2 days 4 days Methadone1 day2-3 days Potential sedativesBloodUrine Flunitrazepam12-24 hrs3 days GHB 6 hours12 hours Barbiturates1+ day2+ days Detection time for hair samples……?

11. 11 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. 11 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. ALCOHOL Alcohol tested using headspace gas chromatography. Concentration of alcohol measured in milligrams per 100 millilitres (mg%) Measured level represents situation at the time the sample was taken. Back calculation carried out to time of incident (if required) Allows for alcohol elimination between the incident and sampling time. General interpretation of effects given. Forward calculation to estimate volume of alcohol consumed/administered also possible. Child’s height and weight and drinking pattern (type of alcohol) required to carry out this calculation.

12. 12 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. DRUGS OF ABUSE Initial screening tests – Enzyme Immunoassay Analysis for common drugs of abuse. DART MS– useful for initial screening of non-biological liquids. Quick initial screens – preliminary results can be available in 24 to 48 hours. Confirmatory tests including sedative and medicinal drug screening carried out using the following techniques - GC-MS HPLC LC-MS Quantification of drug concentration only carried out on blood samples Useful to obtain blood samples in addition to urine if possible.

13. 13 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. HAIR/POISONS???? Poison Screening Can test for other compounds if circumstances suggest e.g. pesticides, metals, household chemicals? Hair testing Can be carried out segmentally to identify pattern of ingestion over weeks/months Can test for variety of drugs but generally requires bespoke methods –can be expensive Reports via a full CJ Act Witness Statement including detailed interpretation of the results obtained.

14. 14 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. 14 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. QUESTIONS CONSIDERED BY THE TOXICOLOGIST Has the child been administered a drug and/or alcohol? Has the drug/alcohol been administered with the intent to cause effect? Could it have been accidental (e.g. herbal cannabis left within reach of a child?) Inadvertent transfer through breast milk Passive inhalation Neonatal abstinence syndrome What effects would the drug/alcohol have on the child? Symptoms – dosage dependent Cause of death? Has the child been administered a drug/alcohol over an extended time period? Hair analysis

15. 15 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. CASE EXAMPLES Methadone poisoning Opiate poisoning Shannon Mathews

16. 16 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. CIRCUMSTANCES Ambulance called 5.53am Resuscitation attempted Child (2 y.o.) pronounced dead 6.47am Ambulance had attended 7pm previous evening Child feverish but otherwise OK; advised to give ‘Calpol ® ’ every 4 hours Found at scene: Bottle of ‘Calpol ® ’ ‘Chesty Cough Linctus’ Empty methadone bottle (prescribed to lodger) Other drug paraphernalia Mother still breast-feeding child

17. 17 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. POST-MORTEM EXAMINATION Carried out 3 days after death Samples taken Femoral blood (small) Heart blood Vitreous humour Stomach content

18. 18 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. ANALYSIS Heart blood screened for alcohol, common drugs of abuse and paracetamol: No alcohol detected High positive methadone EIA Paracetamol <5µg/ml Negative other drugs Femoral blood submitted for methadone quantification Insufficient blood for full quantification Methadone was confirmed as being present Contents of bottles confirmed as being as labelled (no methadone present)

19. 19 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. FURTHER ANALYSIS What now? Possibilities: Quantify heart blood, vitreous humour Other samples ?

20. 20 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. FURTHER ENQUIRIES No other samples had been taken at p-m Requested samples of muscle tissue and liver body thawed out and 4 muscle samples taken from legs as well as a sample of liver

21. 21 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. FURTHER ANALYSIS Methadone levels:- Vitreous humour 0.15µg/ml Heart blood 0.29µg/ml Right thigh muscle 0.72µg/g Right calf muscle 0.71µg/g Left thigh muscle 0.67µg/g Left calf muscle 0.63µg/g Liver 2.5µg/g

22. 22 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. FURTHER ANALYSIS Right thigh muscle – pholcodine detected (therapeutic level) Stomach content – <0.02mg methadone in total

23. 23 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. INTERPRETATION No femoral blood methadone level – possible problems with post-mortem interpretation Conversion of heart blood to femoral blood – wide range of ratios in the few published papers Little published data on muscle or liver levels No published data on vitreous humour levels -one FSS London case for comparison

24. 24 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. INTERPRETATION Femoral blood level (as calculated by conversion from heart blood ratio range) within the published fatal range Heart blood level typically 2-3 times higher than lowest published fatal levels Liver level within the published fatal range Muscle levels all above the published fatal levels Vitreous humour level consistent with previous fatal case Stomach content –no suggestion of recent methadone ingestion

25. 25 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. INTERPRETATION Source of methadone? Defence suggested ingestion of breast milk –feasible? Methadone level in breast milk typically 0.1-0.2µg/ml; highest reported 0.57µg/ml Ingestion of one litre would deliver 0.1- 0.2mg of drug (0.57mg highest) Drug metabolism also occurring in interim (would not ingest one litre in one sitting!) Cannot possibly account for measured levels; likely to need minimum of 10mg of methadone to produce measured levels

26. 26 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. OTHER EVIDENCE Hair from child Showed regular ingestion of: Methadone Cocaine Heroin Mother also a regular drug user (from hair analysis) Heroin Cocaine Methadone (although not prescribed)

27. 27 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. TRIAL (MAY 2006) Court No. 2 Old Bailey MSH gave evidence over whole of morning session (experience questioned!) ARWF gave evidence over whole of afternoon session Jury could not agree on a verdict and therefore discharged Re-trial – June 2006 Jury again failed to reach a verdict Judge recorded formal ‘not guilty’ verdict Defendant had earlier pleaded guilty to a charge of neglect

28. 28 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. 1 month old baby –died end February. Victim placed into a rucksack by parents who travelled several 100 miles to visit baby’s grandparents. Grandparents alerted the police after being shown the body. Post-mortem carried out 3 days later - no obvious cause of death. Samples submitted by police 2 months after death “for completeness” Initial samples taken included – Blood Urine Stomach Contents CIRCUMSTANCES OF CASE

29. 29 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. Parents’ house searched and the following items recovered – Karvol ® Decongestant capsules x 17 + box (3 used) 20 mg Seroxat ® Tablet blister pack (2 tablets remaining) Bottle of Calpol ® (approx 2.5mls remaining). Empty Distalgesic ® blister pack (Co-Proxamol) Empty bottle marked Clonazepam 24 x 0.5mg tablets. Empty container marked Nytol ® Herbal tablets x 28 Empty bottle marked paracetamol 500mg x20 Various feeding bottles, milk powder, gripe water and several items of clothing also seized.

30. 30 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. Blood - Preserved Alcohol 15 milligrams per 100 millilitres of blood Strong positive EIA screening test for opiate drugs and specific morphine!! Urine - Unpreserved Alcohol 42 milligrams per 100 millilitres of urine Low level of micro organisms. Strong positive EIA screening test results for opiate drugs and specific morphine. ANALYTICAL FINDINGS

31. 31 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. ANALYTICAL FINDINGS Blood - Preserved Free Morphine2.1 micrograms per millilitre Total Morphine 3.7 micrograms per millilitre (measured as morphine) Paracetamol~ 140 micrograms per millilitre Monoacetylmorphine and codeine also detected Insufficient blood for further analysis

32. 32 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. Stomach Contents Morphine~ 20 micrograms per millilitre. Total weight of stomach contents approximately 2 grams Total morphine in stomach = approximately 40 micrograms. ANALYTICAL FINDINGS

33. 33 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. ANALYTICAL FINDINGS Muscle sample taken at a later stage (5 th June) at my request. Muscle (Taken From Thigh) Free morphine~2.5 micrograms per gram of tissue. Total morphine ~3.1 micrograms per gram of tissue. Paracetamol ~131 micrograms per gram. Propoxyphene ~3.1 micrograms per gram.

34. 34 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. Results indicate possibility that the victim had been administered alcohol prior to his death. Unable to estimate blood alcohol level at the time of death. Children can eliminate alcohol at a faster rate than adults (e.g. Gibson et al. 1985, Leung 1986, Vogel et al. 1995). Possibility of micro-organism activity prior to post-mortem (at least a 3 day period between death and post-mortem). Samples submitted 2 months later. Urine sample not preserved – micro organisms present. Unknown how samples were stored. ALCOHOL

35. 35 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. Detection of monoacetylmorphine proves heroin ingestion. Concentration of morphine very high and within the toxic range. Ratio of ‘free’ to ‘total’ morphine consistent with ingestion of heroin within a few hours of death – although post-mortem changes must be considered inc. Possibility of morphine glucuronide breakdown to ‘free’ morphine. Post-mortem redistribution - blood sample taken from the heart. Diffusion back into the stomach. MORPHINE/HEROIN

36. 36 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. Thigh muscle sample taken at a later date to assist with interpretation. Muscle results obtained in agreement with the blood. Low level of morphine also detected in the stomach contents. Too low to substantiate method of administration – possible diffusion? MORPHINE/HEROIN

37. 37 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. Paracetamol arisen from Calpol ® and/or Distalgesic ® tablet administration? Recommended dose of Calpol ® to babies under 3 months is 2.5 ml of a 120mg/5ml solution (60 mg paracetamol). Equivalent to approximately 15 mg paracetamol per kg body weight (15mg/kg). Suggested maximum therapeutic paracetamol concentration - approximately 25 micrograms per millilitre following dosage at approximately 30 mg/kg (double recommended dose). Measured concentrations ~140 micrograms per millilitre in blood. ~131 micrograms per gram in muscle. The paracetamol level detected is unlikely to have been life-threatening on it’s own, however is higher than recommended. PARACETAMOL AND DEXTROPROPOXYPHENE

38. 38 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. Propoxyphene was detected in the muscle sample. Propoxyphene concentrations in muscle significantly (2-4 times) greater than in blood (e.g. Langford et al. 1998, Barnhart et al. 2001, Christensen at al. 1985). Therefore measured level of 3.1 micrograms per gram of muscle ≡ 0.8 to 1.5 micrograms per millilitre of blood. Blood concentrations exceeding 1 microgram per millilitre represent serious toxicity. Combined with paracetamol results suggest possible administration of 1 to 2 Distalgesic ® tablets. Paracetamol and propoxyphene also detected in stomach contents (v. low)

39. 39 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. OTHER RESULTS Glass feeding bottle contained approximately 2.5 ml pale pink liquid. Paracetamol (~50mg), propoxyphene (~3.4mg) and a trace level of morphine detected in the liquid. Paracetamol and propoxyphene also detected on the outside of the teat attached. Uncooked starch grains also seen under polarised microscope. Alcohol detected in some of the liquids analysed – produced whilst in storage? Evidence that other items of clothing seized may have been in contact with illicit heroin, cocaine, propoxyphene and paracetamol.

40. 40 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. Deceased had ingested a potentially life-threatening amount of heroin. Unable to say how the drug was given or the amount ingested. Had also ingested a potentially toxic dose of dextropropoxyphene (and paracetamol). Significant interactions can occur between heroin and dextropropoxyphene to increase overall toxic effects inc. respiratory depression. Other results indicate that the deceased may also have been administered alcohol. Deceased had not been administered paroxetine, clonazepam or any of the other common drugs of abuse tested for prior to his death. CONCLUSIONS

41. 41 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. THE TRIAL Prior to the trial there had been two defence examinations (each parent represented separately) Evidence-in-Chief Cross –examination

42. www.forensic.gov.uk © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. The Forensic Science Service ® is a trading name of Forensic Science Service Ltd Forensic Science Service Ltd. is a UK Government owned company OPERATION PARIS The Shannon Matthews Case Toxicologist: Dr Craig Chatterton www.forensic.gov.uk

43. 43 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. 43 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. OPERATION PARIS : Case Circumstances  West Yorkshire Police received a call from Karen MATTHEWS shortly before 7pm on the 19 th February 2008 stating that her 9 year old daughter, Shannon, had not returned home from school. WYP initiate an intense search and open a major investigation  Significant media interest throughout the search including TV documentaries involving Shannon’s family  The media link this case to the (unsolved) abduction/disappearance of Madelaine McCann in Portugal the previous summer  On the 14 th March 2008, twenty-four days after going missing, Shannon is located at the home address of Michael DONOVAN  Urine sample collected for forensic investigation – suspicion that Shannon may have been drugged in order to facilitate the abduction and also whilst in captivity

44. 44 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. 44 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. OPERATION PARIS : Initial information / intelligence  ½ a packet of Traveleeze ® (meclozine) medication found at DONOVAN’s address together with a till receipt dated 13.03.08. During interview, Shannon claims to have been given a white tablet  DONOVAN’s medical records / history investigated. Drugs which form part of his recent prescription include:  Amitriptylineanti-depressant  Clonazepamanticonvulsant  Dihydrocodeineopioid analgesic  Temazepamhypnotic  Tramadolnon-opioid analgesic

45. 45 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. 45 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. OPERATION PARIS : Results and interpretation  Drugs detected in the urine sample:  Temazepam and its metabolite Oxazepam  Meclozine and associated metabolites  Unable, from analysis of urine sample, to determine specifically when these drugs were ingested; both drugs can cause drowsiness  A single dose of temazepam is typically detectable in urine for 2 to 3 days  Drugs have been ingested shortly before sample collection on the 14 th March 2008, i.e., whilst Shannon in captivity rather than before she went missing

46. 46 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. 46 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. OPERATION PARIS : Further investigation - hair  Initial analysis on item CAF120 – obtained 16.04.08 Drug detected0 to 3cm3 to 6cm6 to 9cm9 to 12cm Amitriptyline541413171099 Nortriptyline35110189687 Temazepam2668 Tramadol110230450720 Dihydrocodeine23214967

47. 47 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. 47 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. OPERATION PARIS : Further investigation - hair  Subsequent analysis on item MEAC1 – obtained 19.03.08 Drug detected0 to 3cm3 to 6cm6 to 9cm9 to 12cm Amitriptyline12452810971484 Nortriptyline72284513609 Temazepam492337 Tramadol500130025005000 Dihydrocodeine1003009001200

48. 48 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. 48 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. OPERATION PARIS : Further investigation - hair  Subsequent analysis on item AJG10 – obtained 23.05.08 Drug detected0 to 3cm3 to 6cm6 to 9cm9 to 12cm12 to 15cm15 to 18cm Amitriptyline51961121156182 Nortriptyline2134683111114 Temazepam24791312 Tramadol3090220380540860 Dihydrocodeine10204090120140

49. 49 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. 49 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. OPERATION PARIS : Initial interpretation  Findings demonstrate the ingestion of each drug by Shannon Matthews  Pattern / distribution indicates ingestion on more than 1 occasion  Presence of drug in each segment indicates extended period of time  Ingestion occurred before February 2008, i.e., before disappearance  Could indicate ingestion over period of greater than 12 months  Growth rate varies between 0.7 and 2.2 cm / month  Average growth rate is 1cm per month

50. 50 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. 50 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. OPERATION PARIS : Interpretation issues  Can we be certain of orientation ?  When did the ingestion of drugs begin ?  Why is the concentration of drug highest at the distal end ?  Can a dosage be estimated from the concentration detected in hair ?  Is there anything special about the mixture of drugs ?  Can a more definitive pattern of ingestion be established / investigated ?  Can the rate of hair growth be established ?

51. 51 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. 51 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. OPERATION PARIS : Interpretation issues  Can we be certain of orientation ?  Yes – this was verified by microscopic analysis  When did the ingestion of drugs begin ?  Require growth rate and more analysis to determine  Why is the concentration of drug highest at the distal end ?  Not yet known – several possibilities  Can a dosage be estimated from the concentration detected in hair ?  No, not really

52. 52 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. 52 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. OPERATION PARIS : Interpretation issues  Is there anything special about the mixture of drugs ?  Similar effects, i.e., drowsiness  All part of DONOVAN’s prescription  Can a more definitive pattern of ingestion be established / investigated ?  Yes but this requires more analysis  Can the rate of hair growth be established ?  Yes, West Yorkshire Police to take this forward

53. 53 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. 53 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. OPERATION PARIS : Interpretation issues

54. 54 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. 54 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. OPERATION PARIS : Interpretation issues

55. 55 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. 55 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. OPERATION PARIS : Interpretation issues

56. 56 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. 56 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. OPERATION PARIS : Final interpretation & conclusions  Shannon Matthews ingested drugs during her time period in captivity  In the day or so prior to her discovery on the 14 th March 2008, Shannon Matthews had ingested the prescription-only hypnotic drug temazepam and the antihistamine / antiemetic drug meclozine  Hair analysis demonstrates that Shannon Matthews had ingested amitriptyline, temazepam, tramadol, dihydrocodeine and meclozine in the months leading up to her disappearance in February 2008  The findings demonstrate ingestion on more than one occasion; the distribution of the drugs in Shannon’s hair indicates that all of these drugs were ingested during the same time periods  Based on the established growth rate, the peak in drug concentration in the 10 to 11cm segment coincides with a time period between January and April 2007  Based on the established growth rate, the peak in drug concentration in the 16 to 17cm segment coincides with a time period between May and August 2006

57. 57 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. 57 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. OPERATION PARIS : Leeds Crown Court Nov 11 – Dec 2  On Tuesday 2 nd December, after 6 hours of deliberations, a unanimous verdict was returned  Karen MATTHEWS and Michael DONOVAN were found guilty of all charges  Kidnap, False Imprisonment and Perverting the Course of Justice  Judge indicated that both persons should expect a lengthy custodial sentence

58. 58 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. 58 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved. Acknowledgements With thanks to:  Elizabeth Hird for preparing the presentation  Craig Chatterton (FSS Chorley) who reported the Shannon Matthews case  Contact details: E-mail:Michael. Scott-Ham@fss.pnn.police.ukScott-Ham@fss.pnn.police.uk Tel.:020-7160-4254

59. 59 © Forensic Science Service Ltd. 2009. All rights reserved.