1. 1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Steve Hulbert, for John Hill CFAC May 8, 2007 Experimental Facilities Update

2. 2 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Outline XFD beamline overview XFD activities since last CFAC meeting Lehman review Stability Schedule

3. 3 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Beamlines 15 five m straights for user undulators Could potentially drive up to 30 beamlines by canting two undulators 4 eight m straights for user undulators Could potentially drive up to 8 beamlines by canting two undulators 8 eight m straights for user damping wigglers Could potentially drive up to 16 beamlines by canting two DWs 24 BM ports for UV and soft X-rays 6 BM ports for IR 3 large aperture for far-IR 3 regular aperture for mid/near-IR At least 57 beamlines More w/ multiple IDs per straight Multiple hutches per beamline are also possible

4. 4 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Beamlines BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES IR hutch BM line Soft x-ray Undulator line (8m straight) BM line Hard x-ray Undulator line (5m straight) hard x-ray Undulator line (8m straight) Soft x-ray Undulator line (8m straight) Remote endstations Hard x-ray Undulator line (5m straight)

5. 5 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Beamlines Superconducting Magnet NSLS II Experimental floor Conceptual or pre-conceptual designs exist for a number of beamlines: Inelastic X-ray Scattering Nanoprobe Hard x-ray Coherent scattering Soft x-ray Imaging and coherent scattering Soft x-ray resonant elastic and inelastic scattering High magnetic field High Energy Small Angle X-ray Scattering Infra-Red Imaging Damping Wigglers Protein Crystallography Electron Spectroscopy Bending Magnet

6. 6 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Long Beamlines Heavy access door Utilities tray Optical pipe X-ray beamline Airlock X-ray enclosure

7. 7 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Preliminary Insertion Device Usage at NSLS-II IDTYPEDeviceBeamline type 15mU19IXS: 0.1 meV + 1 meV 28mRF- 35mU19IXS: 50 meV 48mRF- 55mEPU 45Soft x-ray: Scattering and RIXS 68mEPU100PES and LEEM/PEEM 75mU19Optics R+D and Machine diagnostics 88mDWOPEN 95mEPU 45Soft x-ray: coherent scattering and imaging 108mDWWhite beam Laue (time resolved) 115mU19Nanoprobe 128m U19 X 3m Hard x-ray Coherent scattering/SAXS 135mU19Hard x-ray imaging 148m U19 x 3m Liquid interfaces/GISAXS + SAXS 155mU19High Magnetic Field 168mDWPowder + Powder 175mU19Microdiffraction 188mDWTopography 195mU19Resonant scattering and surface diffraction 208mDWEXAFS + EXAFS 215mU19Time resolved materials science 228mSCWHigh energy: High Pressure 235mSCWHigh energy: PDF 248mDWOPEN 255mOPEN 268mDWPX 1, 2 275mU19PX 3 288mDWX-ray Footprinting 295mU19PX 4 308mInjection- Physical Science Beamlines 6 project beamlines in red 16 MIE beamlines in blue Estimate that these 22 beamlines could accommodate ~ 1300 users Life Science Beamlines 5 other funded beamlines Three straights left unassigned

8. 8 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Possible Bending Magnet Usage at NSLS-II “ Beamline types ” in red are beamlines to be moved over from NSLS Note: there is not always a 1:1 correspondence with beamlines at NSLS and NSLS-II. In some cases, equipment may be taken from multiple beamlines.

9. 9 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES “Lehman” CD-1 Review, December 2006 1) R+D program is appropriate 2) Funding for beamlines not sufficient to demonstrate unique capabilities of NSLS-II or meet user demand. 3) Include beam diagnostic BM beamline as part of the project 4) Include mirror metrology R+D in the project 5) Develop beamline access policy in which facility has the responsibility for design, construction and operation of all beamlines. 6) Establish collaborations for design, testing of BL components. Overall, the review was very positive in regard to the NSLS-II design and team. Recommended an increase in cost range to $750-900M For XFD :

10. 10 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Recent Activities Explored use and impact of the addition of a few extended straight sections (up to 16m). Work on user requirements for stability – part of Stability Task Force and workshop (April 18-20). Complex issue. Bottom line for 1nm and 0.1meV*: 10% stability goal for electron beam seems compatible with experiments, if supplemented by state-of-the-art beamline feedback (will require some detector R+D). * w/o feedback, IXS (0.1 meV res’n) needs 0.25  rad vertical angular stability (10% = 0.7  rad) Some techniques, e.g. IR and PX, need horiz. beam position stability <10% of horiz. beam size. Feedback probably req’d.

11. 11 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Recent Activities, continued Chose 6 Project Beamlines Present to EFAC and Users next month, Reworking schedule in light of this decision User meeting set: July 17 th 2007 Present design and solicit feedback and input Discuss project BLs Discuss transition from NSLS to NSLS-II Lab space identified for R+D activities.

12. 12 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Noise and Stability One issue users care a lot about is noise: Mechanical Isolate sources of noise Pay attention to vibration damping (thick slab) Electrical Clean (conditioned) power Dirty power High quality grounds for each RFI Shield from NEXRAD Shield local sources (Storage Ring RF cavities)

13. 13 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Tentative schedule for project beamline activities Determine High Level BL Specifications01-Oct-07 to 01-May-08 Decide Insertion Device for BL01-Oct-07 to 01-May-08 Conceptual Design of Project Beamlines01-Oct-07 to 01-May-09 Submit Conceptual Design to Facility and to EFAC 01-May-09 Technical Design of Project Beamlines04-May-09 to 01-Sep-10 Submission of 100% Technical Design to Facility and to EFAC01-Sep-10 Procurement of Major Beamline Components16-Mar-11 to 12-Aug-11 Contracts Awarded for Major Components12-Aug-11 Fabrication of Major Components15-Aug-11 to 14-May-12 Installation of FOE Hutch16-Jan-12 to 01-May-12 Install of Monochromatic Hutches13-Feb-12 to 31-Aug-12 Testing of Major Beamline Components14-Mar-12 to 29-Aug-12 Beneficial Occupancy of FOE Hutch01-May-12 Install BL Hardware into Hutches02-May-12 to 01-Nov-12 Delivery of Major Components to Site 14-May-12 Testing on all Major Components Complete29-Aug-12 Beneficial Occupancy of Monochromatic Hutches31-Aug-12 Beamline Hardware in place, Ready for Beam01-Nov-12 Commissioning Beamline components without Beam02-Nov-12 to 01-Apr-13 Beam Commissioning of FOE Components18-Jun-13 to 12-Aug-13 Beam Delivered to Endstation 1 of BL112-Aug-13 Commissioning of Endstation 113-Aug-13 to 13-Feb-14

14. 14 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Tentative schedule for project beamlines (con’d) Must complete installation and non-beam commissioning of all 6 project beamlines in 12 months. Beneficial occupancy –FOE: May 2012 –Monochromatic hutches: Aug. 2012 Commissioning of all project beamlines –Aug. 2013 to Feb. 2014 Beamline timelines are realistic, but are very tight, with no float. Beamlines will be waiting for Beneficial Occupancy of the ring floor, FOE, and mono. hutches. Schedule Task Group is coordinating XFD requirements with CFD and ASD schedules. Hiring of XFD Interface Manager is underway.

15. 15 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Summary Lehman review recommendations resulted in an earlier and more robust beamline program Beamline program is dependent on CFD for: Timely availability of experimental floor and utility services Facility that meets stability requirements LOB’s that support User program and staff beamline lab and office needs CFD is dependent on timely design and development of beamline facility requirements for incorporation in CFD design and construction documents These schedule dependencies are actively being coordinated in a schedule task group that meets weekly