1. Thank You to Our Project Sponsors! April 11, 20111 PSI Mattress Stewardship Initiative

2. PSI National Mattress Stewardship Meeting Hartford, CT April 11, 2011

3. Who is the Product Stewardship Institute? April 11, 20113  Non-profit founded in 2000  Membership 47 States 200+ Local governments 70+ Corporate, Organizational, Academic & Non-U.S. Government Partners  Board of Directors: 7 states, 4 local agencies Multi-stakeholder product stewardship network

4.  Unified voice: State and Local Governments  Fiscal relief for government on waste issues  Objective data for decision-making  Forum for collaboration with industry  Nationally coordinated systems/harmonized regulations Why was the Product Stewardship Institute Created? April 11, 20114

5. PSI Projects April 11, 20115  Carpet  Gas Cylinders  Medical Sharps  Paint  Pesticides  Radioactive Devices  Tires  Motor oil  Batteries  Electronics  Fluorescent lamps  Mattresses  Mercury Thermostats  Packaging  Pharmaceuticals  Phone Books

6. A policy approach that ensures that all those involved in the lifecycle of a product share responsibility for reducing its health and environmental impacts, with producers bearing primary financial and management responsibility. What is Product Stewardship? April 11, 20116

7. PSI Principles of Product Stewardship © Product Stewardship Institute – February 25, 2011 1.Cost internalization 2. Producer/Shared responsibility 3. Lifecycle costs 4. Performance goals 5. Flexibility for producers * Endorsements: National League of Cities, Environmental Council of States, Solid Waste Association of North America, and many other organizations April 11, 20117

8. Promote Principles of Product Stewardship Promote product stewardship solutions Reduce product impacts Forge partnerships that share responsibility, with producers playing a key role in product management and sustainable financing Get results – not just discussion PSI’s “Agenda” April 11, 20118

9.  Nearly 100 participants 23 states represented 18 state officials 43 local officials 16 recyclers from 12 companies from 10+ states 11 others 2 waste management industry 2 manufacturers (incl. association) 0 retailers 1 st National Mattress Stewardship Meeting April 11, 20119

10. Review project background Obtain general agreement on: –Issue statement –Dialogue focus and goals Confirm road map and ground rules Learn from presentations and research Explore priority issues and potential strategies Determine next steps –Establish work groups on 2 priority strategies –Missing Stakeholders Meeting Objectives April 11, 201110

11. April 2010 – email survey of PSI government members –Over 80 responses  mattress disposal a significant problem August 2010 – PSI preliminary meeting in Middletown, CT –More than 30 people attended  confirmed interest Developed Project Summary to present issue statement and dialogue goals Conducted interviews with stakeholders to develop a Mattress Stewardship Briefing Document that includes key issues and potential strategies Project Background April 11, 201111

12. This project is focused on mattresses and box springs from residential sources (including both single and multi-dwelling units), as well as large-scale generators such as hospitals, hotels, universities, military, and other institutions. Dialogue Focus April 11, 201112

13. Wasted Resources: of the estimated 40 million mattresses and box springs sold in the U.S. each year, only a small percentage are recycled. Operational Problems: Most mattresses are disposed of in landfills or incinerators – difficult to handle. –Springs can get caught in landfill/incinerator equipment –Hard to keep buried in landfills Cost: Many facilities require removal of mattresses from bulky waste and increasingly charge a per unit tipping fee –Significantly raises costs for municipalities Issue Statement April 11, 201113

14. Cost: Although mattress components have value, including steel springs and polyurethane foam, there is still a net cost to collect and recycle them. Untapped Job Creation Potential: Mattress recycling facilities exist in the U.S. but there is limited consolidation and collection infrastructure. Concerns associated with mattress refurbishment –Health concerns, including spread of bed bugs –Meeting flammability standards and other regulations –Fraudulent practices associated with renovation Issue Statement April 11, 201114

15. 1)Develop a long-term financing system to manage mattresses and box springs in a manner that alleviates the financial burden faced by governments. 2) Determine whether the usual hierarchy of waste management should be promoted with respect to used mattresses and box springs by maximizing the safe and responsible reuse and refurbishment of mattresses and box springs, and recycling their dismantled components, prior to disposal. Dialogue Goals April 11, 201115

16. 3) Increase consumer and retailer awareness of risks associated with the unsafe refurbishment of mattresses and box springs sold by non-compliant businesses. 4) Gain a better understanding of the lifecycle impacts of mattresses and box springs. Dialogue Goals April 11, 201116

17. Road Map April 11, 201117 Stakeholder Meeting – April 11, Hartford CT 6 stakeholder conference calls -- address priority strategies Outcomes/Results

18. Model state mattress stewardship legislation. State or federal regulatory or policy changes. Joint research (“joint fact-finding”). Pilot projects with measurable results (data). Effective enforcement strategy. Model state or national education campaign. Possible Outcomes April 11, 201118

19. Letter of agreement between those involved in pilot project. Memorandum of understanding (MOU) between stakeholders stating intent to perform certain activities. Possible Mechanisms for Agreements April 11, 201119

20. Consensus April 11, 201120 THIS IS A NEGOTIATION! All participants can live with decision and no one will actively block or undermine decision. The greater the stakeholder agreement, the greater the likelihood that the agreement will be sustainable. Consensus is preferable for broad initiatives: –Technical standards, Policies, or Legislation Consensus is NOT needed for pilot projects or individual initiatives.

21. Authorized to represent company, agency, or organization. Attend meeting (or via phone) and conference calls. Jointly develop agreement. Ensure your interests/others’ interests are met. Participation in dialogue does not preclude legislative activity. Negotiate in good faith. Ground Rules April 11, 201121

22. Multiple state solutions. Unilateral state or federal regulation. What Do We Want to Avoid? April 11, 201122

23. “ If you are not at the table, you will be on the menu.” April 11, 201123

24. First meeting – no charge Subsequent Meetings/Calls – free for PSI Full Members (state and local government) or Sustaining Partners (companies, organizations, associations, non-U.S. governments, or universities). This policy is needed so that PSI has the resources to continue to provide meeting facilitation services. PSI Dialogue Fee Policy April 11, 201124

25. # 1 - Managing used mattresses and box springs represents a significant cost to local governments and institutions. #2 - Lack of standardized definition of what constitutes “recycling” and a lack of consumer education about recycling options. #3 - Lack of data on how many mattresses are being recovered, and how many of those are being recycled. #4 - Lack of recognized standards to prevent fraudulent refurbishment and a lack of consumer awareness of risks associated with unsafe refurbishment. #5 - Lack of understanding of the lifecycle impacts of mattresses and box springs. Priority Issues April 11, 201125

26. Background technical information Clarify issues and strategies Additional strategies Prioritize strategies Workgroups at end of day - top 2 strategies Issue/Strategy Discussions April 11, 201126

27. PSI Sustaining Partners April 11, 201127 As You Sow Giles W. and Elise G. Mead Foundation Hotz Environmental