1. An initiative of the ACP Group of States funded by the European Union Global Climate Change Alliance: Intra-ACP Programme Training Module Mainstreaming Climate Change Module 2 – Climate change concepts & development linkages Ms Isabelle Mamaty Senior Expert Climate Support Facility

2. Climate change concepts & development  Learning objectives: o To understand the main climate change concepts o To understand the climate change –development linkages  Expected outcomes: o Increased knowledge on the concepts of vulnerability, risk and hazard, adaptation, mitigation 2

3. Biophysical and socio- economic impacts Biophysical impacts Changes in t° Changes in rainfall patterns Shifts in seasons More frequent or severe storms, floods, droughts Raised sea level Erosion, desertification Changes in water quality/availability Changes in ecosystems Biodiversity loss Disease & pest outbreaks,... Socioeconomic impacts Damage to or destruction of infrastructure Reduced food security, malnutrition Economic disruption, loss of livelihoods, social disruption Increased mortality and morbidity Reduced availability of hydropower Conflicts, population displacement, human migrations,... Vulnerability factors 3

4. Vulnerability Age Gender Social group Education Wealth Access to information and technology ‘Built’ and ‘green’ infrastructure Institutions Social organisation Culture Equity & (in)equality Development level Adaptation Maladaptation + + + - + - Vulnerability ExposureSensitivityAdaptive capacity Resilience 4

5. Hazard and risk HazardRisk Probability of occurrence Severity of consequences 5

6. Adaptation and mitigation Climate, environment & natural resources Impacts Human activities Opportunities, risks & constraints Adaptation Mitigation 6

7. Environment – climate change – development linkages 7 Climate change: - an environ- mental issue - a development issue Source: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Figure B, p. 7.

8. Climate uncertainties  For any given emission scenario, different atmosphere-ocean general circulation models (AOGCMs) provide different projections of future change – sometimes very different ones  Due to the complexity of the climate system, many uncertainties prevail and will persist over the evolution of climate 8

9. The cost of inaction  The uncertainties surrounding climate change are often invoked to justify inaction  In a medium- to long-term perspective, however, inaction now is likely to be more costly: *Wasted investment *Increased vulnerability Failure to adapt *More harmful impacts *Higher adaptation costs Failure to reduce emissions 9

10. The benefits of action  Some climate adaptation and mitigation measures are expected to provide developmental benefits, regardless of the scope and magnitude of climate change or, as far as mitigation is concerned, regardless of carbon prices  Even in the face of uncertainty, some types of measures are justified 10

11. Justified measures in the face of uncertainty (1)  ‘No-regret’ measures: o those expected to produce net benefits for society even in the absence of climate change (adaptation) or independently of any ‘reward’ for mitigation (zero or negative net cost at a zero carbon price)  ‘Low-regret’ measures: o those expected to have a cost for society, but an acceptable one in view of the benefits they would bring if climate change turns out to produce significant effects (adaptation), or to have a low net cost at zero or low carbon prices (mitigation) 11

12.  ‘Robust’ measures: o those that produce net benefits or deliver good outcomes across various possible climate change or carbon price scenarios and economic development scenarios (rather than just under the ‘most likely’ scenario) 12 Justified measures in the face of uncertainty (2)

13. Key messages related to uncertainties  Many uncertainties prevail and will persist over the evolution of the climate o Combination of socioeconomic uncertainties and climate- related uncertainties / modelling limitations o Downscaling of projections remains difficult  Uncertainties do not justify inaction o Look for no-regret, low-regret and robust measures  Adaptive management and scenario-based planning support planning under conditions of uncertainty 13

14. Climate change and sustainable development 14 Environme nt Social dimensio n Economy Sustainable development Climate change Biophysical effects Socio-economic impacts Both adaptation and mitigation support more sustainable development In turn, the pursuit of sustainable development enhances society’s response capacity

15. Climate change and environment  Climate change is a theme to be addressed with other environmental issues: o Climate change exacerbates certain environmental trends and problems  Environmental management has an impact on climate change Credit: Proyecto Rio Hurtado, EuropeAid Photo Library Credit: Vietnamese journalist, EuropeAid Photo Library

16. Climate change and MDGs Potential impacts on MDGs Eradicate extreme poverty & hunger ( Goal 1) Reduce child mortality (Goal 4) Promote gender equality & empower women (Goal 3) Improve maternal health (Goal 5) Combat major diseases (Goal 6) Ensure environmental sustainability (Goal 7) e.g. Adverse effects on food security e.g. Increased incidence of waterborne diseases e.g. Dependence on livelihoods put at risk by CC e.g. Higher incidence of anaemia resulting from malaria e.g. Heat-related mortality & illnesses e.g. Increased stress on ecosystems and biodiversity Source: OECD (2009a) 16

17. The development–adaptation continuum Vulnerability Response to impacts Addressing the drivers of vulnerability  Developmental benefits Building the response capacity => Developmental and climate adaptation benefits Managing climate risk (e.g. DRR) => Primarily adaptation benefits, developmental benefits as a ‘side effect’ Specifically confronting climate change => Quasi-exclusive focus on very specific CC impacts, adaptation benefits only Adapted from: McGray et al (2007), OECD (2009a), Olhoff & Schaer (2010) Benefits in the absence of climate change 1000 17

18. Moving to climate-resilient development Biophysical impacts Socioeconomic impacts Vulnerability factors Climate risk management Specific adaptation measures Development (vulnerability reduction) activities Response capacity building Climate risk management Specific adaptation measures The develop- ment path addresses current and future vulnerability, risks and impacts 18

19. Moving to low-emission development  Generally, the three ‘sectors’ that are the biggest contributors to GHG emissions are also the main targets for emission reductions:  Country-specific emission patterns and development objectives should be considered to determine national mitigation priorities 19 Energy (fossil-fuel burning) Agriculture Land use change esp. deforestation The develop- ment path addresses sources of emissions

20. Building on NAPAs and NAMAs  Many developing countries have now submitted their NAPAs (& NAMAs) to the UNFCCC o NAPAs = national adaptation programmes of action  Help LDCs build national capacities and identify priority adaptation projects with developmental benefits o NAMAS = nationally appropriate mitigation actions  These voluntary mitigation measures are consistent with a country’s development strategy, and are meant to put it on a more sustainable development path  These are a good starting point for addressing the climate challenge without compromising development objectives 20

21. Adaptation and mitigation: seizing opportunities  Green growth o ‘A way to pursue economic growth and development, while preventing environmental degradation, biodiversity loss and unsustainable natural resource use’  Green jobs o Adaptation and mitigation as ‘opportunities’: development co-benefits  e.g. renewable energy  e.g. clean technologies  e.g. forestry (REDD+)  e.g. agricultural productivity Source: OECD (2010b) 21

22. Adaptation and mitigation: developing synergies  Quite frequently adaptation and mitigation measures are congruent and can produce a double stream of benefits o e.g. reduced tillage agriculture enhances carbon sequestration in soils while supporting soil moisture retention, thus increasing resilience to dry spells o e.g. sustainable reforestation may simultaneously enhance carbon stocks and, by offering new livelihood opportunities, enhance the adaptive capacity of local communities 22

23. Adaptation and mitigation: ensuring complementarity  Mitigation should: o Be compatible with adaptation policies and requirements o Rely on environmentally sustainable practices  e.g. unsustainable agrofuels may be a threat to food security, water availability and ecosystems o Not result in increased vulnerability to climate change  Adaptation should: o Take emissions into account  e.g. agricultural intensification for improved food security may increase emissions from the use of fertilisers  e.g. the increased adoption of air conditioning to adapt to heat waves may result in increased emissions from fossil energy use

24. Moving to climate-resilient, low-emission development  Both climate-resilient development and low- emission development result from mainstreaming climate change in policymaking and planning Adaptation mainstreaming Mainstreaming of climate change mitigation Low-emission development Climate-resilient development The two approaches are complementary In both cases, focus on co-benefits 24

25. Turning words into action 25

26. Discussion  Questions and Answers  Climate change challenge What are the opportunities to address climate change challenge in your sector or at your level and what are the institutional and capacity needs in your organisation to do so? 26

27. Presentation of case studies  Case studies: sharing of experiences of events and natural hazards and their impacts in different regions of the specific country 27

28. Learning process exercise : Working group  Exercise : select a development priority, a policy, or a sector programme within the country and discuss its implementation in relation to the vulnerability concept 28

29. Recap – Key messages  Climate change is a development issue as well as an environmental issue o May jeopardise the achievement of the MDGs and other development objectives  Many interventions labelled ‘adaptation’ can also contribute to ‘development’ – and vice versa  Adaptation (with a view to achieving climate-resilient development) and mitigation (with a view to achieving low-emission development) are complementary responses to climate change with the potential to generate significant ‘co-benefits’ in terms of development  Many uncertainties prevail and will persist over the evolution of the climate but do not justify inaction o Look for no-regret, low-regret and robust measures 29

30. Key references  IPCC (2007c) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK & New York, NY, USA. Available from: www.ipcc.chwww.ipcc.ch  IPCC (2007d) Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK & New York, NY, USA. Available from: www.ipcc.chwww.ipcc.ch  Economics of Climate Adaptation Working Group (2009) Shaping climate-resilient development: a framework for decision-making. Climate Works Foundation, Global Environment Facility, European Commission, McKinsey & Company, The Rockfeller Foundation, Standard Chartered Bank & Swiss Re  World Bank – Climate Change Knowledge Portal: http://sdwebx.worldbank.org/climateportal/ http://sdwebx.worldbank.org/climateportal/ 30

31. 31 Thank you Contact: Dr. Pendo MARO, ACP Secretariat pendomaro@acp.int or +32 495 281 494 www.gcca.eu/intra-acp www.gcca.eu/intra-acp