Ies.ed.gov Connecting Research, Policy and Practice Institute of Education Sciences Grant Writing Workshop Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Acting Commissioner.

ies.ed.gov Connecting Research, Policy and Practice Institute of Education Sciences Grant Writing Workshop Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Acting Commissioner National Center for Education Research

ies.ed.gov Agenda Introduction to IES Overview of IES Grant Programs Education Research Grants (84.305A) and Special Education Research Grants (84.324A) – Grant Topics – Grant Research Goals

ies.ed.gov Agenda (cont.) Four Sections of the Research Narrative – Significance – Research Plan – Personnel – Resources Other IES Grant Programs Application Submission and Review

ies.ed.gov A BIT ABOUT IES...

ies.ed.gov Organizational Structure Office of the Director National Board for Education Sciences National Center for Education Evaluation National Center for Education Statistics National Center for Education Research National Center for Special Education Research Standards & Review Office 5

ies.ed.gov Missions of the Research Centers NCER – supports rigorous research that addresses the nation’s most pressing education needs, from early childhood to adult education NCSER – sponsors a rigorous and comprehensive program of special education research designed to expand the knowledge and understanding of infants, toddlers and students with or at risk for disabilities from birth through high school 9/11/2015 6

ies.ed.gov Final Outcomes of Interest: Student Outcomes Birth through Preschool School readiness Developmental outcomes for infants and toddlers with disabilities Kindergarten through Grade 12 Academic outcomes in reading, writing, math, and science Behaviors, interactions, and social skills that support learning in school and successful transitions to post-school opportunities High school graduation Functional outcomes that improve educational results, transitions to employment, independent living, and postsecondary education for students with disabilities 7

ies.ed.gov Final Outcomes of Interest (cont.) Postsecondary Access, persistence, completion Achievement in gateway math and science courses Achievement in introductory composition courses Adult Education Reading, writing, and math for basic and secondary education and English language learners

ies.ed.gov Agenda Introduction to IES Overview of IES Grant Programs Education Research Grants (84.305A) and Special Education Research Grants (84.324A) Four Sections of the Research Narrative Other IES Grant Programs Application Submission and Review

ies.ed.gov Research & Research Training Grant Programs Education Research Grant Programs (84.305A) Special Education Research Grant Programs (84.324A) Statistical & Research Methodology in Education (84.305D) Evaluation of State & Local Education Programs & Policies (84.305E) Accelerating the Academic Achievement of Students with Learning Disabilities Research Initiative (A3) (84.324D) Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships in Education Research (84.305H) Research Training Grant Programs in the Education Sciences (84.305B) Research Training Program in Special Education (84.324B)

ies.ed.gov FY 2013 NCER (305) & NCSER (324) Grant Programs Application Deadline Letter of Intent Due Date Application Package Posted Start Dates 305A: Ed Research 324A: Sp Ed Research 305D: Stats/Methods 6/21/124/19/12 3/1/13 to 9/1/13 305A: Ed Research 324A: Sp Ed Research 305B: Research Training 324B: Sp Ed Research Training 324D: A3 Initiative 305E: State/Local 305H: Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships 9/20/127/19/12 7/1/13 to 9/1/13 Important Dates and Deadlines 11

ies.ed.gov Information for Applying http://ies.ed.gov/funding  Requests for Applications  Letter of Intent  IES Grants.gov Application Submission Guide  Application Package

ies.ed.gov Requests for Applications (RFA) A separate RFA for each grant program Describes requirements for application RFAs are available on http://ies.ed.gov/funding To be informed about release of future RFAs, sign up for the IES Newsflash: http://ies.ed.gov/newsflash

ies.ed.gov Letter of Intent (LOI) A short description of your intended application – PI, institution, collaborators – Budget (rough estimate) – Up to 1 page abstract describing work Not used in review process – Superseded by your application Submitted on http://iesreview.ed.gov

ies.ed.gov IES Grants.gov Application Submission Guide Instructions for completing and submitting application package Available on http://ies.ed.gov/funding about April 19, 2012

ies.ed.gov Application Packages for FY 2013 Available at www.grants.gov – Help: support@grants.gov or 1-800-518-4726support@grants.gov For June 21, 2012 deadline, packages available starting April 19, 2012 For September 20, 2012 deadline, packages available starting July 19, 2012 Packages specific for grant program and deadline

ies.ed.gov Eligibility to Apply In general – Applicants have ability and capacity to conduct scientifically valid research – Include, but are not limited to, nonprofit and for-profit organizations and public and private agencies and institutions, such as colleges, universities, and school districts But eligibility is different for Training Programs, Evaluations of State & Local, and Researcher- Practitioner Partnerships

ies.ed.gov How to Identify Appropriate Grant Programs Read the Request for Applications Review announced topics and methodological requirements Look at abstracts of projects funded under a research topic or program – http://ies.ed.gov/ncer/projects – http://ies.ed.gov/ncser/projects Contact appropriate Program Officer

ies.ed.gov Grant Topics All applications to 84.305A and 84.324A must be directed to specific topic – Note: SF 424 Form, Item 4b (Agency Identifier Number) – Note: Top of Abstract and Research Narrative

ies.ed.gov Education Research Topics (84.305A) Cognition and Student Learning Early Learning Programs and Policies Education Technology Effective Teachers & Effective Teaching English Learners Improving Education Systems: Policies, Organization, Management, and Leadership Mathematics and Science Education Postsecondary and Adult Education Reading and Writing Social and Behavioral Context for Academic Learning

ies.ed.gov Exercise: Identify the Appropriate Education Research Topic Purpose: This study will examine the association between aspects of preschool quality and child health, behavioral and cognitive outcomes in community-based and school-based early care and education programs. Purpose: The purpose of this research is to test several possible ways to influence participation in college savings plans and subsequent savings behavior. Purpose: This study will provide a detailed examination of factors that predict gender differences in elementary school mathematics performance. Purpose: This project is designed around findings from a local needs assessment of teachers, which found: a) a need for more support for laboratory work; b) a need for greater access to subject matter experts; and c) a strong desire to plan together.

ies.ed.gov Special Education Research Topics (84.324A) Autism Spectrum Disorders Cognition and Student Learning in Special Education Early Intervention and Early Learning in Special Education Families of Children with Disabilities Mathematics and Science Education Professional Development for Teachers and Related Service Providers Reading, Writing, and Language Development Social and Behavioral Outcomes to Support Learning Special Education Policy, Finance, and Systems Technology for Special Education Transition Outcomes for Secondary Students with Disabilities

ies.ed.gov Exercise: Identify the Appropriate Special Education Research Topic Purpose: This research group will develop and preliminarily evaluate SELF: Social-Emotional Learning Foundations to promote emotional and behavioral self-regulation for children in kindergarten and first grade who are at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Purpose: This research will provide guidance for speech-language pathologists by examining how dosage, techniques, and context are associated with language outcomes. Purpose: There have been challenges with making computer-based test items accessible to students who are Braille readers. The purpose of this project is to add enhancements in testing accommodations for students who are blind or have low vision to an existing platform that delivers a Grade 8 reading assessment. This project will provide a fully functional computer-based test delivery platform designed to increase accessibility and meet the needs of these students.

ies.ed.gov Topic Specific Issues for Education Research Program All require student outcomes (Effective Teachers, Systems) Grade range varies by topic – Most topics are for K-12 students only – Early Learning: For pre-K (ages 3-5) and their teachers Exception if project is to follow pre-K students into later grades applicant can choose most appropriate topic – Education Technology: pre-K to adult except science (grade 12) – Cognition: pre-K to adult (voc ed, adult ed, remedial post-sec) – Postsecondary and Adult: for older students Postsecondary includes high school programs to get students into postsecondary Postsecondary limited to sub-baccalaureate and baccalaureate Adult: adult basic education, adult secondary education, and English Learner

ies.ed.gov – Improving Education Systems: Policies, Organization, Management, and Leadership Anything designed to improve the overall functioning of a school, district, state, or national education system – Programs – Finance – Leadership – Organization and Management Combined into 1 topic because interventions may include all of these approaches Topic Specific Issues for Education Research Program II

ies.ed.gov Topic Specific Issues for Education Research Program III Topics can Overlap – Effective Teachers & Effective Teaching Read/Write & Math/Science: determine if focus is on professional development or on curriculum/instructional approach Cognition: applying cognitive science to teacher practice Early Learning topic is for pre-K teachers English Learners: if for EL teachers can be either Improving Ed Systems: teacher certification, recruitment, and retention can go to either topic – Ed Technology with all programs Is focus/team on tech development or on substance? – English Learners with Read/Write & Math/Science Is EL the primary focus or a secondary focus? – Improving Ed Systems with all programs Except Early Learning Programs and Policies and Postsecondary and Adult Education

ies.ed.gov Choosing among Overlapping Topics What literature are you citing? To which topic is your area of expertise best aligned? If your focus is on a specific population of students/teachers, go to that program/topic: – Is your focus on a specific type of student/teacher (e.g., students with autism or English language learners), or are you studying them as subgroup of your sample?

ies.ed.gov Topic Specific Issues for Education Research Program IV Pre-service programs Only exploratory research can be done on teacher pre-service programs – No development of pre-service programs, evaluation of them, or measures-development for them Can develop or evaluate pre-service components with in-service teachers Support for leadership pre-service programs, if programs last 24 months or less

ies.ed.gov Issues Specific to Special Education Program Topics Children with disabilities or at risk for developing disabilities – At risk based on individual assessment, not population characteristics (e.g., low SES) – Be specific about which disabilities you are addressing Specify the inclusion/screening criteria Applicants to following topics must address students with disability only (not students at risk for disability) – Transition Outcomes for Secondary Students with Disabilities – Autism Spectrum Disorders – Families of Children with Disabilities

ies.ed.gov Issues Specific to Special Education Program Topics II Grade Coverage – Early Intervention: Birth to Age 5 – Cognition: Birth to Grade 12 – Technology: Birth to Grade 12 – Autism: Pre-K to Grade 12 – Transition: Secondary students (i.e., middle/high school) into Postsecondary settings – Others: K to grade 12 Overlaps – Autism and Other Topics Comprehensive interventions with multiple outcomes to Autism One outcome goes to the relevant topic (e.g., Math/Science) – Early Intervention and Other topics, if follow pre-K students to later grades

ies.ed.gov Decide Which Topic Your Research Idea Would Fall Under Think about your research question(s) Decide which topic it best fits under If not sure – Check RFA – Discuss with Program Officer

ies.ed.gov Grant Research Goals All applications to 84.305A and 84.324A must be directed to specific research goal (1 of 5) – Note: SF 424 Form, Item 4b – Note: Top of Abstract & Research Narrative Goal describes type of research to be done So, every application is directed to specific topic/goal combination

ies.ed.gov The 5 Research Goals Exploration Development & Innovation Efficacy & Replication Effectiveness Measurement

ies.ed.gov Exploration Goal Explore associations between education outcomes and malleable factors Identify factors and conditions that may mediate or moderate the relations between malleable factors and student outcomes

ies.ed.gov Malleable Factor A factor that can be changed by the education system be it a student, teacher, or school characteristic, or an education program or policy – Underlying processes that enhance or inhibit learning – Aspects of a school, district, or community associated with beneficial education outcomes – Education interventions associated with beneficial education outcomes

ies.ed.gov Exploration Goal (cont.) Possible methodological approaches – Analyze secondary data – Collect primary data – Complete a meta-analysis Funding Limits – If secondary data analysis or meta-analysis only Maximum 2 years and $700,000 – If including primary data Maximum 4 years and $1,600,000

ies.ed.gov At the End of an Exploration Project A clear description of malleable factors found, and any accompanying mediators and/or moderators Evidence regarding associations of those factors with student outcomes A well-specified conceptual framework and/or theoretical framework linking identified factors and student outcomes Information about whether what you learned in this project could lead to: – The development or refinement of an intervention – The rigorous evaluation of an intervention – The development of a conceptual framework to be used in the development or revision of an assessment

ies.ed.gov Would these Research Questions fit under Exploration? Do middle school girls score higher on English achievement tests than boys? Is hands-on science teaching associated with better grades for boys? Is increasing foster care payments linked to better academic outcomes of foster children? Does the Bluebird Reading Curriculum cause higher student achievement on reading tests? Do students with certain types of disabilities have shorter attention spans?

ies.ed.gov Development & Innovation Goal Develop an innovative intervention (e.g., curriculum, instructional approach, program, or policy) OR improve existing education interventions AND collect data on its feasibility and usability in actual education settings AND collect pilot data on student outcomes Development process must be iterative!

ies.ed.gov Feasibility of Implementation Implement intervention in authentic education delivery setting Small sample of users Should be carried out in type of setting and with types of users for which intervention is intended

ies.ed.gov Development & Innovation (cont.) Collect pilot data on promise of intervention to achieve intended outcomes – Does not need to be causal study – Stronger with comparison group – Can be no more than 30% of grant budget – Obtain evidence to support grant for evaluation Maximum award: 4 years and $1,500,000

ies.ed.gov At the End of a Development Project A fully developed version of intervention, along with – A well-specified theory of change and – Evidence that intended end users understand and can use intervention Data that demonstrate feasibility of implementation Pilot data regarding promise, along with – Fidelity measure(s) and – Evidence regarding fidelity of implementation. 9/11/2015 43

ies.ed.gov Would These Study Designs Fit Under Development & Innovation? Develop 9 th grade biotechnology course over summer, implement from September to December, and measure student gains in knowledge. Give half the students iPads, monitor how they’re used, and compare test scores at end of year. New writing program – Develop with 10 teachers over 1 year – try components out in class and revise accordingly – Feasibility test with the 10 teachers in Year 2 – Compare writing scores of students of the 10 teachers to scores of students from 10 other teachers in Year 3

ies.ed.gov Efficacy & Replication Goal Evaluate whether or not a fully developed intervention is efficacious under limited or ideal conditions OR Gather follow-up data examining the longer term effects of an intervention with demonstrated efficacy OR Replicate an efficacious intervention varying the original conditions

ies.ed.gov Efficacy & Replication Goal II Ask what might be needed to implement intervention under routine practice Reduce appearance of conflict of interest for developer-evaluators Do not require confirmatory mediator analyses but recommend exploratory ones NCSER also accepts efficacy studies that propose single case experimental designs

ies.ed.gov Efficacy & Replication Goal III Causal test of whether or not a fully developed intervention has a beneficial impact on student outcomes relative to a counterfactual in an authentic educational setting – Interventions already in wide use – Interventions not in wide use – Follow-up study

ies.ed.gov Efficacy & Replication Goal IV Detailed description of intervention – Theory of change – Empirical evidence – Practical importance Designs that support causal inference are required – Random assignment to intervention and comparison conditions preferred – Strong quasi-experiment designs can be proposed when experiment not feasible – Single-subject methods/single-case designs permitted for Special Ed – Check What Works Clearinghouse evidence standards (RCTs, RDD, Single Case, Attrition)

ies.ed.gov Efficacy & Replication Goal V Address power of design to identify impacts Address fidelity of implementation of treatment and comparison groups Address important moderators Include details about measures & analysis plan Avoid apparent conflicts of interest for evaluation team Maximum award: 4 years and $3,500,000

ies.ed.gov Efficacy & Replication Follow-up Study Follow students who received intervention into later grades, or Follow teachers (principals or schools) who received intervention after the project ends to see if sustained effect on practice and on student outcomes Maximum award: 3 years and $1,200,000

ies.ed.gov At the End of an Efficacy Study Evidence of impact of clearly specified intervention on relevant student outcomes relative to comparison condition using research design that meets WWC standards Conclusions on and revisions to theory of change that guides intervention 9/11/2015 51

ies.ed.gov At the End of an Efficacy Study II If beneficial impact is found – Identify organizational supports, tools, and procedures needed for future implementation If beneficial impact is not found – Determine whether and what type of further research would be needed to revise the intervention 9/11/2015 52

ies.ed.gov Would these Study Designs fit under Efficacy & Replication? Randomly assign use of iPads to treatment and control classrooms Intervention will provide 3 weeks of teacher training, ongoing coaching, plus classroom materials Match 30 schools who adopted an anti-bullying program to 30 schools who did not based on % minorities and FSL and average test scores 4 districts agree to take part in a study that will randomly assign a math curriculum to 2 of them

ies.ed.gov Effectiveness Goal Evaluate whether a fully developed intervention that has evidence of efficacy is effective when implemented under typical conditions through an independent evaluation Prior to submitting an effectiveness proposal, at least two efficacy studies of the intervention with beneficial and practical impacts on student outcomes must have been completed 54

ies.ed.gov Effectiveness Goal IES expects researchers to – Implement intervention under routine practice – Include Evaluators independent of development/distribution – Describe strong efficacy evidence for intervention Does not expect wide generalizability from a single study – Expects multiple Effectiveness projects to this end – Sample size is not a key distinction from Efficacy Does not require confirmatory mediator analyses but encourages exploratory ones Cost of implementation is limited to 25% of budget 55

ies.ed.gov Effectiveness Awards Limit of 25% of budget for implementation of the intervention Other requirements similar to Efficacy & Replication Replications of Effectiveness studies are allowed with different populations (e.g., students, schools) Maximum award: 5 years and $5,000,000

ies.ed.gov Effectiveness Follow-up Study Follow students who received intervention into later grades Maximum award: 3 years and $1,500,000

ies.ed.gov At the End of an Effectiveness Study Evidence of impact of clearly specified intervention on relevant student outcomes implemented under routine conditions relative to comparison condition using research design that meets WWC standards Conclusions on and revisions to theory of change that guides intervention 9/11/2015 58

ies.ed.gov At the End of an Effectiveness Study II If beneficial impact is found – Identify organizational supports, tools, and procedures needed for future implementation If beneficial impact is not found – Determine whether and what type of further research would be needed to revise the intervention 9/11/2015 59

ies.ed.gov Would these Study Designs fit under Effectiveness? A researcher wants to test new in-service math teacher training program developed under a Development and Innovation grant in 60 randomly assigned classrooms. A district wants to compare two Algebra 1 curricula, and the companies agree to provide them at cost along with teacher coaching. A charter management company with evidence from 2 small efficacy studies receives funds from a millionaire to take over 40 schools. 80 schools apply, and the company will randomly select half if it receives IES funds to do an evaluation.

ies.ed.gov Measurement Goal Development of new assessments or refinement of existing assessments, and validation of these assessments OR Validation of existing assessments for specific purposes, contexts, and populations 61

ies.ed.gov Measurement Goal Not for evaluating an assessment used as an intervention The measure is the primary product – Not intended to support the creation of a measure as part of a larger study Maximum award: 4 years and $1,600,000

ies.ed.gov Would these Study Designs fit under Measurement? Develop formative chemistry assessment to help students learn how to balance formulas Develop measure of teacher instruction in fractions and validate it against teacher logs and principal observations Develop measure of student attention and validate it against student grades as part of project to evaluate intervention to increase student time on task

ies.ed.gov At the End of a Measurement Goal To develop/refine and validate an assessment – Description of assessment & its intended use – Description of processes used to develop/refine, including field testing procedures & processes for item revision – Well-specified conceptual framework – Description of validation activities – Evidence on reliability & validity for specified purposes, populations, and contexts 9/11/2015 64

ies.ed.gov At the End of a Measurement Goal To validate an existing assessment – Well-specified conceptual framework that provides theoretical basis for assessment and its validation activities – Description of validation activities – Evidence on reliability & validity for specified purposes, populations, and contexts 9/11/2015 65

ies.ed.gov The Goals Build on One Another Exploration may lead to – Development or modification of intervention – Efficacy evaluation of intervention Development & Innovation may lead to an Efficacy evaluation if intervention is feasible and pilot data is supportive Efficacy & Replication may lead to an Effectiveness evaluation if impact found Measurement can also feed into other goals

ies.ed.gov But You Can Start at Any Goal 9/11/2015 67

ies.ed.gov Decide Which Goal Your Research Idea Would Fall Under Think about your research question(s) Decide which goal it best fits under If you are not sure: – Check RFA – Discuss with Program Officer – If your idea straddles several goals, consider breaking it into smaller pieces – Choose goal with best fit, not the one that offers the most funding

ies.ed.gov Dissemination Expected for all Goals Publications in peer-reviewed journals Quick release of findings – Working papers, presentations and posters, seminars Products others can use – Software, manuals, instruments, monographs Teaching others to use findings/products – Short courses, long courses, on-line tutorials Long-term collaborations with practitioners Submit final, peer-reviewed manuscripts to the Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC)

ies.ed.gov Connecting Research, Policy and Practice The Application’s Research Narrative Key part of your application 4 Sections: Significance Research Plan Personnel Resources Each section scored and an overall score given Requirements vary by program & goal 25 pages, single spaced

ies.ed.gov Significance Describes the overall project – Your research question to be answered; intervention to be developed or evaluated, or measure to be developed and/or validated Provides a compelling rationale for the project – Theoretical justification Logic Models, Change Models – Empirical justification – Practical justification

ies.ed.gov Significance Do not assume reviewers know significance of your work Do not quote back RFA on general importance of topic – e.g., RFA paragraph on lack of reading proficiency of 8 th - and 12 th -graders based on NAEP data Do quote back RFA, if a specific topic is highlighted and your work will address that topic

ies.ed.gov Significance: Exploration Goal Describe malleable factors, moderators, and mediators to be examined Justify their importance – Theoretical rationale – Empirical rationale – Practical importance How work will lead to useful next step – Development or modification of interventions to address the identified malleable factors or underlying process to improve student outcomes – Identification of interventions for more rigorous evaluation Overall importance

ies.ed.gov Significance: Development Goal Context for proposed intervention – Why needed: what problem exits – What exists now (may be many alternatives already) Detailed description of intervention to be developed – Clearly identify components already developed, partially developed, and to be developed (no jargon) – Don’t overextend (# grades, full vs. part year) Theory of change (theoretical support) Empirical support Practical importance: – Meaningful impact, feasibility, affordability Answer the question: Why will this intervention produce better student outcomes than current practice? Overall Importance

ies.ed.gov Significance: Efficacy & Replication Detailed description of intervention – Show fully developed, implementation process, and ready to be evaluated Justification for evaluating the intervention – Importance of practical problem it is to address – If in wide use, show it has not been rigorously evaluated – If not in wide use, show evidence of feasibility and promise to address the practical problem Theory of change: Why will this lead to expected outcomes? – Theoretically and empirical rationale – Direct impact on student outcomes or through mediators Justify that it could lead to better outcomes than current practice Overall importance

ies.ed.gov Significance: Effectiveness Detailed description of intervention Justification for evaluating the intervention – Evidence of meaningful impacts (Efficacy study) Theory of change Justify that it could lead to better outcomes than current practice Implementation under normal conditions Independent evaluation Evidence that implementation can reach high enough fidelity to have meaningful impacts Overall importance

ies.ed.gov Significance: Measurement Description of assessment and how it will be used Theoretical basis for constructs to be measured Empirical evidence for constructs Practical need for the assessment Feasibility of use Overall importance

ies.ed.gov Significance: 2 Key Problem Areas Unclear description of malleable factor or intervention – May have many components and these may be applied at different times Graphic may help – Unclear how to be implemented to ensure fidelity – Unclear why strong enough to expect an impact – Overly focused on actions not content Example: Provide 10 PD sessions, 4 hours apiece, but no detail on what occurs in sessions

ies.ed.gov Lack of a Theory of Change – Why malleable factor should be related to student outcome – Why intervention should improve outcomes versus current practice – Why an assessment/instrument should measure a specific construct – A well laid-out theory of change makes clear what is expected to happen and in what order – Easy for reviewers to understand research plan – why measure certain outcomes – Graphic can be helpful (e.g., a logic model) Significance: 2 Key Problem Areas

ies.ed.gov Four Sections of the Research Narrative Significance Research Plan Personnel Resources

ies.ed.gov Research Plan Describe the work you intend to do – How you will answer your research question, develop your intervention, evaluate the intervention, or develop and/or validate your assessment Make certain Research Plan is aligned to Significance section – All research questions should have justification in Significance Step-by-step process – Timeline to show when everything will be done

ies.ed.gov Research Plans Differ by Research Goal However, all should describe Setting Population and sample – Sampling plan: inclusion and exclusion criteria – Sample size (power issue) and handling attrition – External validity Measures – Outcomes: proximal and distal; answer research questions – Other measures: fidelity, feasibility, operating as intended, feedback – Quantitative & qualitative – Reliability & validity – Relevance: sensitivity vs. broad interest – Multiple comparisons issue

ies.ed.gov All Research Plans Should Include (cont.) Research Design (more detail on following slides) Analysis – Describe how it answers research questions – Show your model: show different types of models used – Address clustering – Describe how missing data will be handled – Check for equivalency at start of study and attrition bias throughout – Describe sensitivity tests of assumptions – Describe analysis of qualitative data and links to quantitative analysis

ies.ed.gov Research Design Start off with research questions Research design should answer research questions – Do not have design section written independently by methodologist – If sections are written by different people, have everyone read through whole application Issues common to designs across goals – Attrition and missing data – Obtaining access to and permission to collect/use data

ies.ed.gov Research Design Varies by Goal Exploration – Primary data Sampling strategy Data collection and coding processes – Secondary data Descriptive analysis Statistical correlational analysis Analyses attempting to address selection issues Mediation analysis Development & Innovation – Focus should be on iterative development process – Feasibility study: use in authentic education setting – Pilot study: comparison to a similar group

ies.ed.gov Research Design Varies by Goal Efficacy & Replication – Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) preferred Unit of randomization and justification Procedures for assignment – Strong quasi-experiment - justify why RCT not possible How it reduces or models selection bias Discuss threats to internal validity – conclusions to be drawn – Describe control/comparison group – Power analysis/MDES – show calculation and assumptions – Fidelity of implementation study in both T and C – Mediator and moderator analyses – Contamination issues: schools vs. classrooms

ies.ed.gov Research Design Varies by Goal Effectiveness – Same as Efficacy & Replication except requires implementation under routine conditions, independent evaluator, and a cost study Measurement – The plan to develop or refine the assessment Evidence of constructs Interpretation of assessment results Item development and selection Procedures for administering and scoring – Reliability and validity studies

ies.ed.gov Four Sections of the Research Narrative Significance Research Plan Personnel Resources

ies.ed.gov Personnel Section Describe key personnel – Link each person and their expertise to their role in project - show that every aspect of project has person with expertise to do it Methodologists: show expertise in particular method to be used Substantive person for all issues addressed Do not propose to hire a key person with X expertise Project management skills – Give time contribution for each - show that every aspect has enough time from expert Orient CVs so specific to project – 4 pages plus 1 page for other sources of support

ies.ed.gov Personnel Requirements Publication record and projected publications from this grant are considered Developers should discuss past success getting developed interventions evaluated If previous IES grant, discuss results Evaluations require attention to objectivity should a developer or persons with financial interest be involved – Efficacy projects: address how objectivity maintained – Effectiveness: Independent evaluation: developer can provide routine implementation support

ies.ed.gov Personnel Strategies for PI Senior Researcher – Show adequate time to be PI – Make credentials clear: not all reviewers may know Junior Researcher as PI – Show adequate expertise not only to do work but to manage project – Reviewers may be more comfortable if you have senior person(s) on project to turn to for advice

ies.ed.gov Resources Show institutions involved have capacity to support the work – Do not use university boilerplate Show that all organizations involved understand and agree to their roles – What will each institution, including schools, contribute to project – Show strong commitment of schools and districts – Have alternatives in case of attrition

ies.ed.gov Resources (cont.) Appendix C should back this up – Detailed Letters of Support from research institutions, States, districts, schools Data issues – Document permission to use and access to confidential data (letters in Appendix C) – Show familiarity with data and show that it can be used to do proposed work – If merging datasets, show that it can be done

ies.ed.gov Appendices Appendix A (15 page limit) – Figures, charts, and tables – Examples of measures – 3 pages to address past reviewer comments or to argue that a proposal is a new submission Appendix B (10 page limit) – Examples of materials used in intervention or assessment Appendix C (no page limit) – Letters of agreement (districts, schools, data providers, other partners, consultants)

ies.ed.gov Budget and Budget Narrative Provide clear budget and budget narrative for overall project and each sub-award IES Grants.gov Application Submission Guide describes budget categories Check RFA for specific budget requirements for Research Goals and Grant Programs Ensure agreement among Research Narrative, Budget, and Budget Narrative

ies.ed.gov Connecting Research, Policy and Practice Grant-writing for Additional FY 2013 Research Programs

ies.ed.gov Other Research Grant Programs Do not use topic/goal structure, but are informed by that structure Stats/Methods and Evaluation of State & Local use a similar Research Narrative All except the Stats/Methods program are due no later than September 20, 2012 Stats/Methods applications are due June 21, 2012

ies.ed.gov Statistical & Research Methodology in Education (84.305D) Research projects intended to expand and improve methodological and statistical tools available for education researchers These tools will be used to improve design of research studies, analysis of research data, and interpretation of research findings 100

ies.ed.gov Evaluation of State & Local Education Programs & Policies (84.305E) Support for rigorous evaluations of education programs or policies that are paid for and implemented by State or local education agencies Evaluations are to determine both overall impact of programs/policies and impact across a variety of conditions 101

ies.ed.gov Accelerating the Academic Achievement of Students with Learning Disabilities Research Initiative (A3)(84.324D) To develop and evaluate interventions (e.g., instructional approaches, curricula, technology) to accelerate reading and math achievement of students with or at risk for reading and math disabilities in grades 3 through 8 Will create tightly linked network of researchers across variety of disciplines who will work collaboratively to address the problem 102

ies.ed.gov A3 Project Narrative Significance Research Plan – Development of a set of interventions – Evaluation of the efficacy of an evaluation – Supplementary exploratory research (optional) – Timeline Personnel Management Plan Resources Project Narrative is limited to 35 single-spaced pages 103

ies.ed.gov Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships in Education Research (84.305H) Intended to support partnering of researchers with State and local education agencies in development of joint research projects 104

ies.ed.gov Partnership Project Narrative Significance of the Research-Practitioner Partnership – Strength of the partnership – Research aims of the partnership Research Plan – Developing the partnership – Developing the research plan – Developing the application for further Institute funding Personnel Resources Project Narrative limited to 25 single-spaced pages 105

ies.ed.gov Research Training Programs in the Education Sciences (84.305B) Postdoctoral Research Training Program Researcher and Policymaker Training Program in the Education Sciences 106

ies.ed.gov Postdoctoral Research Training Program For institutions to establish postdoctoral training programs to train researchers in skills necessary to conduct the type of research that the Institute funds 107

ies.ed.gov Researcher and Policymaker Training Program in the Education Sciences Researcher Training – to provide opportunities for current education researchers to maintain and upgrade their methodological skills Policymaker Training – to share evidence from rigorous education research with education practitioners and policymakers working on a specific program or policy 108

ies.ed.gov Training Program Narrative Significance of Training Program Research Training Plan Personnel Resources Training Program Narratives are limited to 15 single- spaced pages. 109

ies.ed.gov Research Training Program in Special Education (84.324B) Early Career Development and Mentoring – Provides new investigators support to further develop methodological, content, and grant writing expertise needed to develop a strong line of research that includes federal funding – Requires identification of mentor at time of application – Requires a research plan and career development plan 110

ies.ed.gov Early Career Program Narrative Significance of the Research and Career Development Plans Research and Career Development Plans Personnel Resources Early Career Program Narratives are limited to 25 single-spaced pages. 111

ies.ed.gov Award Parameters (84.305B-H & 84.324B-D) ProgramMaximum Number of Years Maximum Award (direct + indirect) 305B Postdoc Training5 years$687,000 305B Researcher & Policymaker Training 3 years$1,000,000 324B Early Career4 years$400,000 324D A35 years$10,000,000 305D Stats/Methods3 years$900,000 305E State/Local 305H Partnerships 5 years 2 years $5,000,000 $400,000 112

ies.ed.gov Grant Submission Make sure your institution is registered on Grants.gov Complete your online forms and upload PDFs Authorized representative completes the process Submit by 4:30:00pm DC time on deadline – earlier is safer If problems uploading – Contact Help Line 1-800-518-4726 and get a case number 114

ies.ed.gov Verification of Submission You should receive three e-mails – Grants.gov will say they have received your submission and assign you a number that starts with GRANT – Grants.gov will say your application is validated or rejected due to errors. If the latter, resubmit until validated. – Department of Education will assign you a grant number starting with R305 or R324 115

ies.ed.gov Application Review (Standards & Review Office) Compliance screening for format requirements Responsiveness screening to program/goal requirements Assigned to review panel – 2-3 reviewers (substantive and methodological) – If scored high enough, application is reviewed by full panel Many panelists will be generalists to your topic There will be an expert in every procedure you use – Overall score plus scores on Significance, Research Plan, Personnel, and Resources – So far, all applications with overall score of Outstanding and Excellent have been funded Resubmissions encouraged – Talk to Program Officer and address reviewer comments 116

ies.ed.gov Peer Review Process Information http://ies.ed.gov/director/sro/peer_review/index.asp

ies.ed.gov Notification All applicants will receive e-mail notification of the status of their application All applicants receive copies of reviewer comments If you are not granted an award the first time, plan on resubmitting and talk to your Program Officer

ies.ed.gov Additional Webinars Available http://ies.ed.gov/funding/webinars/index.asp Application Process Grant Writing Workshops for each goal Grant Writing Workshops for early career researchers and minority serving institutions Overviews of research training programs Overviews of NCSER funding opportunities

ies.ed.gov For More Information http://ies.ed.gov/funding Elizabeth Albro Elizabeth.albro@ed.gov 120

Ies.ed.gov Connecting Research, Policy and Practice Institute of Education Sciences Grant Writing Workshop Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Acting Commissioner.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Ies.ed.gov Connecting Research, Policy and Practice Institute of Education Sciences Grant Writing Workshop Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Acting Commissioner."— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback

Log in

Auth with social network:

Ies.ed.gov Connecting Research, Policy and Practice Institute of Education Sciences Grant Writing Workshop Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Acting Commissioner.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Ies.ed.gov Connecting Research, Policy and Practice Institute of Education Sciences Grant Writing Workshop Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Acting Commissioner."— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback