We think you have liked this presentation. If you wish to download it, please recommend it to your friends in any social system. Share buttons are a little bit lower. Thank you!
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRobert Johnston
Modified over 4 years ago
Page 1© Crown copyright 2007 Initial tendencies of cloud regimes in the Met Office Unified Model Keith Williams and Malcolm Brooks Met Office, Hadley Centre for Climate Change Submitted to J. Climate ENSEMBLES/CFMIP workshop, Paris, 12/04/07
Page 2© Crown copyright 2007 Why look at cloud regimes in short range forecasts? Differences in the simulation of present-day cloud regimes amongst GCMs has been shown to contribute to a significant proportion of the spread in climate sensitivity (Williams and Tselioudis 2007). However, it may not be easy to identify the cause of errors in a particular regime from the model climatology. The Met Office has the unique asset of using the same physical model for its operational data assimilation, NWP forecasts and climate change projection (HadGEM1). Evaluation of cloud regimes in short range forecasts provides a framework in which the initial meteorological conditions are constrained by observations. Thus the evolution of the errors may provide information on the cause of systematic model bias.
Page 3© Crown copyright 2007 Principle questions to be addressed Are the properties of the simulated cloud regimes (e.g. frequency of occurrence; radiative effect) similar in a short simulation (a few days) as in the model climatology? Does the increased resolution in the NWP model improve the simulation of the cloud regimes? Are the cloud regime properties any closer to observations immediately after the model is initialised from operational analyses? Can initial tendencies in the state variables be associated with particular cloud regimes?
Page 4© Crown copyright 2007 Principal tropical cloud regimes
Page 5© Crown copyright 2007 Principal extra-tropical cloud regimes
Page 6© Crown copyright 2007 Initial tendencies in cloud regime properties
Page 7© Crown copyright 2007 Initial temperature tendency in cloud regimes
Page 8© Crown copyright 2007 Conclusions The simulated cloud regimes are essentially the same in a short run as for the model climatology, hence improvements (which will be relevant to both NWP and climate) can be tested in short runs (although it would be good to address a few initialisation issues). Increased resolution generally has little effect on the cloud regimes, although the simulation of tropical shallow cumulus is improved, whereas tropical deep convection is too infrequent when compared with ISCCP. The errors in the simulated cloud regimes are generally no smaller at T+0, which suggests weaknesses in the local processes (boundary layer/cloud/convection). Some of the initial tendencies in the state variables appear to be associated with particular regimes, which may help with identifying a cause.
Page 9© Crown copyright 2007
Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, Devon, EX1 3PB United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) Fax: +44 (0)
Streamflow assimilation for improving ensemble streamflow forecasts G. Thirel (1), E. Martin (1), J.-F. Mahfouf (1), S. Massart (2), S. Ricci (2), F. Regimbeau.
© Crown copyright 2006Page 1 CFMIP II sensitivity experiments Mark Webb (Met Office Hadley Centre) Johannes Quaas (MPI) Tomoo Ogura (NIES) With thanks.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2007 CFMIP2: Options for SST-forced and slab experiments Mark Ringer, Brian Soden Hadley Centre,UK & RSMA/MPO, US CFMIP/ENSEMBLES.
© Crown copyright Met Office Towards understanding the mechanisms responsible for different cloud-climate responses in GCMs. Mark Webb, Adrian Lock (Met.
The Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project Plans for CFMIP-2
Page 1© Crown copyright 2007 Constraining the range of climate sensitivity through the diagnosis of cloud regimes Keith Williams 1 and George Tselioudis.
What’s quasi-equilibrium all about?
Predictable Chaotic Exhibits memory Equilibrium Towards non-equilibrium Acknowledgements LD is supported by NERC CASE award NER/S/A/2004/ Conclusions.
1 Evaluating climate model using observations of tropical radiation and water budgets Richard P. Allan, Mark A. Ringer Met Office, Hadley Centre for Climate.
Robin Hogan (with input from Anthony Illingworth, Keith Shine, Tony Slingo and Richard Allan) Clouds and climate.
Robin Hogan Ewan OConnor Damian Wilson Malcolm Brooks Evaluation statistics of cloud fraction and water content.
© Crown copyright 2006Page 1 The Cloud Feedback Model Intercomparison Project (CFMIP) Progress and future plans Mark Webb (Hadley Centre) and CFMIP contributors.
Numerical Weather Prediction Models
Page 1© Crown copyright Simulation of radar reflectivities in the UK Met Office model: comparison with CloudSat Data Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo, M.E. Brooks.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2006ESWWIII, Royal Library of Belgium, Brussels, Nov 15 th 2006 Forecasting uncertainty: the ensemble solution Mike Keil, Ken Mylne,
Data assimilation for validation of climate modeling systems Pierre Gauthier Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Université du Québec à Montréal.
© Crown copyright Met Office ACRE working group 2: downscaling David Hein and Richard Jones Research funded by.
© Crown copyright Met Office Radiation developments Latest work on the radiation code in the Unified Model James Manners, Reading collaboration meeting.
1. The problem of mixed-phase clouds All models except DWD underestimate mid-level cloud –Some have separate “radiatively inactive” snow (ECMWF, DWD) –Met.
© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.