Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byKevin McDonald Modified over 5 years ago

1
Quantum Search of Spatial Regions Scott Aaronson (UC Berkeley) Joint work with Andris Ambainis (U. Latvia)

2
Grovers Search Algorithm Unsorted database of n items Goal: Find one marked item Classically, (n) queries to database needed Grover 1996: O( n) queries quantumly BBBV 1996: Grovers algorithm is optimal Great for combinatorial searchbut can it help with a physical database?

3
What even a dumb computer scientist knows: THE SPEED OF LIGHT IS FINITE Marked item Robot n n Consider a quantum robot searching a 2D grid: We need n Grover iterations, each of which takes n time, so were screwed!

4
Undirected connected graph G=(V,E) Bit x i at each vertex v i Goal: Compute some Boolean f(x 1 …x n ) {0,1} State can have arbitrary workspace z: | = i,z |v i,z Alternate query transforms |v i,z (-1) x(i) |v i,z with local unitaries U What does local mean? Depends on your religion Whats the Model?

5
Defining Locality: 3 Choices (1)Decomposability U is a product of commuting edgewise operations (2) Zero pattern of U respects graph 0100 0010 0001 1000 (3) Zero pattern of Hamiltonian H respects graph U = e iH H has bounded eigenvalues (1) (2),(3) Upper bounds work for (1) Lower bounds for (2),(3) Whether theyre equivalent is open

6
So why not pack data in 3 dimensions? Then the complexity would be n n 1/3 = n 5/6 Trouble: Suppose our hard disk has mass density We saw Grover search of a 2D grid presented a problem…

7
Once radius exceeds Schwarzschild bound of (1/ ), database collapses to form a black hole Makes things harder to retrieve… Holographic Principle: Best one can do asymptotically is store data on a 2D surface, 1.4 10 69 bits/meter 2 So Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity both yield a n lower bound on search But can we search a 2D region in less than n steps? Benioff (2001): Guess we cant…

8
REVENGE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE We can. ( n time to move across grid is needed for subroutine anyway) By adding more levels of recursion, can make running time O(n 1/2+ ) Example: Take a classical subroutine that searches a square of size n in n steps Run n copies in superposition and use Grover O(n 3/4 ) Revenge of computer science Can we do better? Say n?

9
Amplitude Amplification Brassard, Høyer, Mosca, Tapp 2002 Theorem: If a quantum algorithm has success probability p and returns a certificate, then by invoking it m times, m=O(1/ p), we can amplify success probability to (1-m 2 p/3)m 2 p # of Iterations Success Probability Diminishing returns Better to keep prob low & amplify later

10
Assume theres a unique marked item Divide into n 1/5 subcubes, each of size n 4/5 Algorithm A: If n=1, check whether youre at a marked item Else pick a random subcube and run A on it Amplify n 1/11 times Algorithm for d 3 Dimensions T(n) n 1/11 (T(n 4/5 )+O(n 1/d )) = O(n 5/11 ) P(n) (1- )n 2/11 n -1/5 P(n 4/5 ) = (n -1/11 ) (we show is negligible) Running Time: Success Prob: Amplify whole algorithm n 1/22 times to get T(n) = O(n 1/22 n 5/11 ) = O( n),P(n) = (1)

11
Summary of Bounds d 3 d=2 Unique marked item ( n)O( n log 2 n) k marked items ( n / k 1/2-1/d )O( n log 3 n) Arbitrary graph O( n log c n) n 2 O( log n) Arbitrary graph, h possible marked items O( h (n/h) 1/d log c h) ( h (n/h) 1/d ) n 2 O( log n) When d=2, time for Grover search matches radius of grid An arbitrary graph is d-dimensional if for any vertex v, number of vertices at distance r from v is (min{r d,n}) When there are h possible marked items with known locations, the worst case is that theyre evenly scattered

12
Razborov 2002: ( n) Problem: Alice has x 1 …x n {0,1} n, Bob has y 1 …y n They want to know if x i y i =1 for some i Application: Disjointness How many qubits must they communicate? Buhrman, Cleve, Wigderson 1998: O( n log n) Høyer, de Wolf 2002: O( n c log*n )

13
A B State at any time: Communicating one of 6 directions takes only 3 qubits Disjointness in O( n) Communication i,z(A),z(B) |v i,z A |v i,z B

14
Recent Progress Childs-Goldstone: Spatial search by quantum walk O(n 5/6 ) for d=3, O( n log n) for d=4, O( n) for d>4 Running time not competitive with ours in low dimensions, but less memory needed Ambainis-Kempe: Discrete walk with 2-bit coin O( n log n) for d=2, O( n) for d 3 Connection to Dirac equation?

Similar presentations

© 2019 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Ads by Google