1. Public Health Reporting Initiative – Stage 3 Sprint

2. SPRINT Objective Create an implementation specification for public health reporting that can be tested and implemented in time for Stage 3 – Testing by late fall-early winter 2012 – Implementation of reporting by Oct 2015 Specification can serve multiple report types: focused on shared “core” elements Supports collection of an “extended” set of data elements Largely compatible with needs of a larger number of report types

3. What Maximizes Benefit to All? An implementation specification required for certification of Stage 3 EHRs that – Provides immediate benefit to some reporting programs – Establishes conditions that will benefit other reporting programs

4. PHRI User Story Implementation Guide Candidates User StoryProposed Tier Reportable condition case reporting1 Healthcare acquired infection reporting1 Cancer registry reporting1 Early Hearing reporting1 Birth and fetal death reporting1 Drug adverse event reporting1 Medical device adverse event reporting1 Vaccine adverse event reporting2 Natl. Hospital Care Survey2 Immunization registry exchange2 Tobacco quit line exchange2 BRCA counselling registry reporting2

5. Proposal Tier 1: 7 stories appear with relatively high level of readiness; focus on unidirectional; broad national scope Tier 2: 5 stories with either less readiness and/or more complex scope (e.g., bidirectional exchange, referral)

6. Stage 3 Readiness Sub-workgroup: Goal Create an implementation specification for consideration to be included in stage 3 “Core” spec + Extensions – 7 Tier 1 candidates – 5 Tier 2 participants (defer to Tier 1 consensus) Tier 1 Agencies & Associations Tier 2 Agencies & Associations EHR, PH, and Intermediary System Vendors

7. Possible Process 1.Set ground rules 2.Build consensus on common “core” data elements 3.Develop consensus on format - HL7 2.x, CDA or both 4.Address how “core” elements and different “extension” elements are managed 5.Address how “trigger” and “filter” knowledge base should function 6.Document decisions in Implementation Guide (support team) – Review progress in weekly checkpoints

8. Members and Support Team Lead: Seth Foldy Members: – User Story Submitters – Federal Agency Reps – Association / Member Reps – EHR Vendors / PH IT vendors / staff Support Team – Erik Pupo, SME – Brian Castor, PM – Lindsay Brown, Business Analyst – Ashley Swain, Shalina Wadhani – IG Technical Writing

9. Timeline / Commitment Estimated time commitment: – Meeting: 1.5 – 2 hours per week – Homework: 1 - 2 hours per week If you are interested in helping with this work, email lrbrown@cdc.gov lrbrown@cdc.gov TaskDue Date Meetings with User Story Submitters, Federal Partners, and Association Partners to introduce PHRI, Implementation Guide development, gain buy-in and survey the vendor landscape 6/26 – 7/10 Weekly Meeting Kick-offThursday 7/26 2-4 PM EST (weekly Thursday meetings) Final Implementation Guide completed9/25 (tentative)

10. Risks / Dependencies Aggressive timeline Member (or proxy) participation – Possibility of forking Base Standard “fit” Future dependency: Pilot setting