Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 SEFI Mitigation Technique for COTS Microprocessors – Proton Testing Demonstration D. Czajkowski, P. Samudrala, D. Strobel, and.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 SEFI Mitigation Technique for COTS Microprocessors – Proton Testing Demonstration D. Czajkowski, P. Samudrala, D. Strobel, and."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 SEFI Mitigation Technique for COTS Microprocessors – Proton Testing Demonstration D. Czajkowski, P. Samudrala, D. Strobel, and M. Pagey Space Micro Inc., Suite 400 San Diego, CA 92121

2 2 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 ➢ Single Event Functional Interrupts (SEFI) introduction ➢ H-Core chip for SEFI mitigation in microprocessors ➢ Tests/Results for Pentium P-III processor ➢ Tests/Results for TI-DSP Processor ➢ Tests/Results for BSP Processor ➢ Summary Overview

3 3 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 ➢ ➢ EIA/JEDEC Standard No. 57 (1996): “ The loss of functionality of the device that does not require cycling of the devices power to restore operability unlike SEL and does not result in permanent damage as in SEB” ➢ SEFIs observed in various complex integrated circuits: EEPROMs, DRAMs, ADC/DACs, and Microprocessors. ➢ Most common solution for SEFIs is to power cycle the system: “Even single bit-flips can create circuit-level effects that cause string of errors, or even result in a “lock-up” condition that requires removal of power and subsequent re-initialization to resume proper operation” Single Event Functional Interrupts

4 4 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 ➢ SEFI Characteristics ✔ Processor Hangs Suddenly ➢ Probable causes of “Hangs” ✔ Illegal branching ✔ Upsets in program counter of the CPU ✔ Jumps to undefined/test states ➢ Approx. rates : 1 per 100 days for SOI Power PC and 1per 10 for CMOS version ➢ Current solution to power cycle the system ➢ Results in unnecessary delays and data loss SEFIs in Microprocessors

5 5 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 ➢ H-Core ✔ Combination of Software and Hardware ✔ Monitors CPU Functionality ✔ Stores rollback information ✔ Detects and indicates SEFI occurrences ✔ Revives CPU from SEFI events ➢ H-Core ✔ Sends CPU alive messages ✔ Saves periodic roll-back information ✔ Reads SEFI indicator from H-Core chip, and ✔ Recovers running processes after SEFI events H-Core Technique CPU Bus Controller Memory Ethernet SCSI HBA H-Core Chip ➢ H-Core ✔ Combination of Software and Hardware ✔ Monitors CPU Functionality ✔ Stores rollback information ✔ Detects and indicates SEFI occurrences ✔ Revives CPU from SEFI events ➢ H-Core ✔ Sends CPU alive messages ✔ Saves periodic roll-back information ✔ Reads SEFI indicator from H-Core chip, and ✔ Recovers running processes after SEFI events H-Core Technique CPU Bus Controller Memory Ethernet SCSI HBA H-Core Chip

6 6 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 The H-Core Chip ➢ Manufactured using rad-hard components ➢ Usable with any processor ➢ Provides min. 8 interrupt signals ➢ Uses MOSFET driver for power cycle ➢ Provides variable levels and pulse widths of interrupts ➢ Contains programmable CPU check timer ➢ Sets SEFI status signal for SEFI recovery software ➢ Provides external reset control

7 7 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 Radiation Tests ➢ Radiation Tests on three different processors were performed at Crocker Nuclear Laboratory at UC, Davis ➢ Processors used ✔ Pentium P-III ✔ TI TMS320C6713 DSP ✔ Equator BSP-15 DSP ➢ Each processor was bombarded with radiation to induce a SEFI ➢ H-Core circuit was then used in mitigating the induced SEFIs ➢ The following slides discuss the tests

8 8 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 Irradiation Test Procedure ➢ Verify test loop results without radiation ➢ Start irradiation and monitor test loop results ➢ Stop irradiation when incorrect/no test loop results received ➢ Assert H-Core signals in sequence to revive the processor ➢ CPU assumed to be fully recovered when it responds to a signal

9 9 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 Radiation test of Intel PIII ➢ SEFI test performed by irradiating Pentium P-III processor ➢ H-Core circuit was used in bringing back the processor from SEFI ➢ Test performed at U.C, Davis, California ➢ Used a test program containing an infinite loop of arithmetic operations

10 10 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 Intel PIII Experimental Setup VSBC-8d Test Computer Serial Console Monitor Computer RS-232 Ethernet H-Core Signals ➢ Software/Hardware include: ✔ SEFI board and test loop ✔ Diagnostic self-tests ✔ Hardware watchdog ✔ Linux software watchdog ➢ Controls test loops, ➢ Collects test results, and ➢ Sends H-Core signals

11 11 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 Test and Monitor Software ➢ VSBC-8d runs Linux OS ➢ Test loops: ✔ Mathematical functions test ✔ CPU timer test ✔ Network communication test ✔ IDE controller test ➢ Monitor software: ✔ Serial console and telnet ✔ Socket communication with test loops ✔ Data logging during irradiation ✔ H-Core signal generation after SEFI Monitor software H-Core signal controls Output

12 12 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 H-Core Signals for Intel P-III ➢ BINIT#Bus state machine reset ➢ INIT#Resets integer registers ➢ LINT0General purpose interrupt signal. ➢ IRQ5Hardware interrupt through PCI bus. ➢ LINT1Non-maskable interrupt (NMI). ➢ RESET#Intel PIII hardware reset signal. ➢ Software, hardware, and APIC watchdogs.

13 13 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 H-Core Signal Success Rate ➢ SEFI Occurrences and Recovery ✔ 21 SEFIs detected during experiment ✔ 21 SEFIs recovered using H- Core signals ✔ IRQ5, NMI, and RESET# most effective signals ✔ Presence of software, hardware, APIC watchdog aids recovery

14 14 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 TMS320C6713 Radiation Test March 2004 ➢ SEFI test performed by irradiating Texas Instrument's TMS320C6713 DSP ➢ A custom board called SEFI Switch was built ➢ SEFI switch with controlling software (running on monitor computer) was used as a H-Core chip for SEFI mitigation ➢ Test performed at U.C, Davis, California ➢ Used a test program containing an infinite loop of arithmetic operations

15 15 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 USB Communication TMS320C6713 DSP Monitor Computer ➢ Development Board ➢ Runs TTMR Test Loops ➢ Communicates using USB-JTAG link ➢ Windows 2000 PC ➢ Monitors and controls the TI-DSP board TI-DSP Experimental Setup

16 16 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 ➢ CodeComposer allows remote monitoring of processor ➢ All processor registers can be observed during irradiation ➢ Test loop results are transmitted back to Monitor computer ➢ If the processor hangs, interrupts and reset are asserted ➢ List of Interrupts for TI processor ✔ HD4 ✔ INT7 ✔ INT6 ✔ INT5 ✔ INT4 ✔ NMI Monitoring TI-DSP Execution

17 17 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 Signatures of SEFI Program counter at unexpected memory location ➢ Typical SEFI signatures observed during radiation experiment: ✔ Jumps to arbitrary memory locations containing random data ✔ Execution of valid instructions that are not part of current program

18 18 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 ➢ A total of 9 SEFIs were observed ➢ Interrupts and Reset able to bring back the processor in 7 cases ➢ Observed a success rate of 77.7 % in mitigating SEFIs ➢ Reset was the most effective signal TI-DSP Radiation Test : Results

19 19 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 H-Core Signals BSP-15 Radiation Test August 2004 ➢ Processor : Equator BSP-15 DSP processor ➢ Estimating the performance of H-Core circuit by bombarding BSP-15 processor with different fluxes of radiation ➢ Test Facility : U.C, Davis, California ➢ Input Program : a set of arithmetic operations running infinitely

20 20 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 BSP-15 Experimental Setup RS-232 Ethernet H-Core Signals SEFI SwitchTest Board Monitor Computer Serial Port Ethernet Port

21 21 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 BSP-15 SEFI Test ➢ SEFI switch and the controlling program running on the Monitor computer acts as a H-Core chip ➢ Processor bombarded with radiation until it hangs ➢ The interrupts viz. INTD, INTB, INTA and RESET signal are asserted after detecting a SEFI ➢ Customized interrupts service routines are called when an interrupt is pulled

22 22 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 BSP-15 Test Results ➢ The processor has encountered 26 SEFIs during the test ➢ The interrupts were asserted in the increasing order of their severity ➢ Interrupts had a success rate of 11.5% in mitigating the SEFIs ➢ However, reset had 100% success rate ➢ In all the cases the processor was revived without powering cycling the board

23 23 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 ✔ Anatomy of SEFI illustrated using proton irradiation of Pentium P-III, TI-DSP, and Equator BSP – 15 microprocessors ✔ Demonstrated the effectiveness of H-Core circuit in SEFI mitigation ✔ Processors recovered from all detected SEFIs using H-Core signals without requiring power cycle ✔ Tests indicate that H-Core has 100 % success rate in mitigating SEFIs without powering down the board Conclusions


Download ppt "1 CzajkowskiMAPLD 2005/139 SEFI Mitigation Technique for COTS Microprocessors – Proton Testing Demonstration D. Czajkowski, P. Samudrala, D. Strobel, and."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google