1. 1 WP7 (Network) status &plans Paris 6 th of March 2002 Pascale PRIMET INRIA/ RESO - ENS Lyon Pascale.Primet@ens-lyon.fr

2. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA2 WP7 specificity In testbed0 and testbed1 the networking functionality was here (<= IP technology) WP7 is in charge of a shared resource called “Network Element” –Quantifiable => network monitoring –Efficient => advanced transport protocols –Flexible => differentiated network services –Secure => firewalls/ encrypted channels?

3. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA3 Logical view of the Grid Network Ressource = CE (computing element) ou Ressource = SE (storage element)

4. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA4 « Physical » view of the Network Public Network No security No predictable performances No control on the traffic R = CE ou R = SE The flat INTERNET

5. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA5 WP7 aims => WP7 is helping Network Service Provider in designing specific E2E network services by mapping the application/middleware requirements to network services (QoS, Multicast, security…) <=WP7 is helping A/Mw in getting E2E performance : measurement, problems (TCP tuning, hardware limitations….)

6. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA6 What is a “ Network Element”? SiteA SiteBSiteD SiteC Network Element associated to the SiteA

7. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA7 How to characterize a “NE”? a NE is belonging to some Site A NE is a “shared resource” that permit communication over a WAN interconnexion a NE is a set of oriented IP links a NE is characterized at IP level by: A loss rate mean/max/average… A loss pattern A delay mean/max/average… A delay pattern A nominal rate (or TCP throughput) mean/max/average… An aggreed QoS….(SLA) WP7 is discussing this concept, trying to clarify and model it for the ATF

8. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA8 WP7 specific plan for 2002 T7.1 : Collaboration with Dante/NRENs/SEQUIN –Pilot services test (QoS, multicast) –Dedicated machines in GEANT PoPs T7.2 : QoS and advanced services - Requirements studies and test (WP10) - Reliable Multicast - High performance transport protocol (TCP/nonTCP) T7.3 : Network Monitoring Architecture –Refine the model with WP2/WP3 –Prepare a plan to analyse monitoring data T7.4 : Security => pls see Dave Kelsey talk on Friday morning

9. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA9 WP7 Strategy Year1: –Network requirements studies –Network connectivity/capacity evaluation –Initial network monitoring architecture proto/test Year2: –Optimize the Monitoring Architecture (visualization, measurement scheduling, data analysis…) –Performance optimization –Security design –Experiments and developments with Net providers, with other network projects (Geant, Sequin? DataTag)

10. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA10 WP7 strategy Year2 : study/test; Year3: provide –Network forecasting tools/API (perf opt) –Grid traffic monitoring tools (accounting) –High throughput services/API? (perf opti) –Reliable multicast service/API? (new service)

11. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA11 Network Monitoring Architecture P_RTPLP_NWSMiddleware Data Collector Raw IPerfGridFTPSNMP…PingEr Mesurement Publication MapCenter RTPL Resource BrokerNetwork managers Data processor LDAP Forecaster Analysis/ processing P_RTPLP_NWSMiddleware Data Collector Raw IPerfGridFTPSNMP…PingEr Storage MapCenter RTPL Resource BrokerNetwork managers Data processor LDAP Forecaster

12. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA12 Collaboration with GEANT E2E :Close participation to pilot services –Test of IP Premium service/WP10 In Backbone : –Use of dedicated machines in GEANT POPs Amsterdam, Geneva, London –Tests of high throughput transfers –Test of IP multicast for Reliable Multicast –Sharing WP7 monitoring and DANTE monitoring data

13. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA13 WP7 and other collaborations WP7 and DataTAG –QoS service study and experiment –High Throughput study and experiment –Network monitoring and measurement

14. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA14 WP7 and other WPs interactions WP1 – WP2 : monitoring/forecasting for scheduling/ optimization WP3 : NetMon/R-GMA test /MapCenter integration WP6 : provisionning/ firewall config/ LAN config/Netmon deployment… WP8-9-10 : VO links and traffic monitoring, QoS and perf requirement studies/test

15. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA15 WP3/WP7/WP4 : Monitoring 14H30 – 16H : 5th of March /EDG Paris conference Netsaint presentation (INFN) Discussion : how GUI can be interfaced with MapCenter, R-GMA and WP4 sensors? Coordination of the Network Monitoring activity in EDG - WP3/WP7 interaction: - GRIDftp logs

16. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA16 WP7/WP2/WP1: optimization Tuesday afternoon 16h-18h : Presentation of the Query Optimization API (WP2) Presentation of the replica optimisation based on an economical model Algorithm for network optimization (network cost function) (WP7) Discussion : coordination of this activity  WP7 will provide an API for a NetworkCost function  Defining a « site ID » - to map CE or SE IP address to some IP address/hostname representing the site.  Deadline : end of May

17. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA17 Resource sharing A long term debate in the Internet community: QoS-IP 3 strategies: No garanties => Best Effort –Measure, monitor the perf and adapt –Communication/computing/storage Strict Guaranties => Reservation – throughput, CPU, disk Statistical Guaranties => Prioritisation –Connexions, jobs, users…. Which type of guaranty you really need, how the solutions scales, what is the cost What are the advantages and the drawback of the solutions…

18. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA18 Resource sharing Which type of guaranties do you really need? Do the solution scales ? What is the cost ? What are the advantages and the drawback of each solutions? In the Internet, we are working since more then ten years on the subject…. We still have only Best Effort…and adaptive protocol/application like TCP…

19. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA19

20. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA20

21. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA21 Monitoring Tools Monitoring of Round Trip Time and Packet Loss – edg-pinger (integrated in release 1.0) –RIPEncc one way loss and delay (specific links) Monitoring of throughput (release 1.1 or 1.2) –edg-iperf –edg-rtpl DataGRID status visualization –Mapcenter (collaboration with GLOBUS and WP3) –Other tools evaluation (Netsaint....)

22. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA22 Forecasting tools WP7 is exploring and improving the NWS (Network Weather Service) in close collaboration with NWS designer (Rich Woski) Requires to work closely with : –WP1 : integrate network forecasts in cost function for scheduling of jobs –WP2 : for replication of files

23. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA23 Quality of Service QOS in DataGRID has two Different goals : Guaranty high throughput for all bulk transfers. Work ongoing with DANTE Guaranty prioritization for specific application needs. Work ongoing with WP8, WP9 and WP10 to identify precisely such applications.

24. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA24 TCP Throughput Optimization WP7 is working on different solutions : TCP mechanisms optimization –Tests of applicability of new mechanisms Use of QoS solutions –diminution of Packet Loss

25. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA25 Information System Close Collaboration with WP3. WP7 is testing the R-GMA An LDAP backend is existing for edg- pinger and other tools.

26. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA26 Contacts WP7 manager: Pascale Primet WP7 deputy : Peter Clarke ATF and Integration team : Franck Bonnassieux Collaboration with Dante: Tiziana, Richard Monitoring : Robin Tasker, Cees DeLaat Information System : Peter Clarke QoS : Tiziana Ferrari High Throughput : Richard Hughes Jones Forecasting : Robert Harakaly Security : Dave Kelsey

27. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA27 We aggreed The emphasis of WP7 work is now on task T7.2. Propose evaluating Scavenger and assured BW service for TCP transfers with Dante to request access to the Dante infrastructure until July 2002 Franck will receive all bugs for the WP7 tools and send them on to the person responsible To re-start the monitoring for WP7 test sites. Richard and Tiziana offered to run the experimental TCP code

28. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA28 Actions list Action Richard: put new Technical Annex on the web. Action Pascale, Peter: Define the CERN EU demonstration and call in experts as required. Action all: Please give any presentations/papers on WP7 to Pascale so that they may be recorded under DataGrid dissemination. Action Pascale& Peter: To submit a paper on monitoring deliverable D7.2 for Computer Communications special journal issue on Grid computing - deadline 1 Mar 02. Action Pascale: Draft an invited paper on WP7 work to be presented at Terena by end of April. Action Richard: Put in link to the ccwp7.in2p3.fr site on the public WP7 site Action Tiziana: check Cisco version and give the Queue monitor command

29. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA29 Action list Action Rich discuss possible use of UDPmon with Sylvain Action iGrid2002 Action Tiziana: Ask for a suitable (eg 2-3 month) loan of Juniper 1GE interfaces Action Roberto Dante to check for space and free FPC in the M160 and provide a list of PoPs that we might be able to use. Action Richard Tiziana Pascale: Supply a proposal to Dante 10 days prior to the next Policy Committee, Action Tiziana : Supply Dante with more details of IP Premium users as input to the Sequin workshop. Action All : send update information on the maps to Frank Action Robin, Jules: develop the monitoring workplan for the next meeting including collaboration with WP3.

30. Pascale PRIMET/ INRIA30 Action List Action ALL: take the current.rpm as delivered and install it at the WP7 test sites. Action Robert : circulate a detailed proposal on a possible protocol for scheduling. Action Tiziana : circulate the WP1 paper Action Pascale: try to organise a cross WP meeting on monitoring / possible use of NetSaint in Paris. Action Franck : bring NetSaint to attention of ATF Action Tiziana : Create a list / outline of the report with sub- editors for the sections Action Rich/Tiziana : Make a roadmap of the 7.2 work – who does what.