1. Standards-In-Action Pilot KENTUCKY

2. OVAE’s SIA Consortium 2 State leads 3 Program directors Geographically accessible Performance Strong leadership Selection Criteria

3.  Rural vs. Urban  Size  Population e.g., ESL, levels…  Fiscal agent e.g., BOE, CTC Other Criteria?

4. Training  OVAE’s SIA Consortium  http://www.adultedcontentstandards.ed.gov/default.asp  Equal partners  Strategized => Consensus  Modified & adapted  Decision-making = Buy-in

5.  Active participation  Modeling  Coaching  Job-embedded  Collaborative environment  Sustained over time  Practice, practice, practice  Reflect, improve, reflect… Elements to include in training?

6.  OVAE’s SIA Consortium  Strategic planning & decision-making  Program directors – Instructional leaders  Opportunity for discussion  Collegial resources ?? ?? Support Resources

7. From the Mouths of Participants What Was Learned from Pilot?

8. Programmatic Professional Learning Collaborative Opportunities & Collegial Planning Continuous Improvement & Instructional Leadership Videos 11, 12, 3

9. Scaling UP  Programmatic PL  Part-time instructional staff  Communities of learning  Coaches  Planning for sustainability

10. Evaluating the Effectiveness  Researched, valid process & training – OVAE’s SIA  Collaborative decision- making  Feedback + Reflection = Improvement  Kirkpatrick flip

11.  Results – Is the desired impact being felt?  Performance – Did they transfer their skills to the workplace?  Learning – Did they learn the needed skills and/or use the resources they were given?  Motivation – Are they motivated to learn and perform? Kirkpatrick

12. Students and Standards Video 8

13. Standards-In-Action Pilot KENTUCKY