Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Interpretation of Bone mineral density

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Interpretation of Bone mineral density"— Presentation transcript:

1 Interpretation of Bone mineral density
Tuan Van Nguyen and Nguyen Dinh Nguyen Garvan Institute of Medical Research Sydney, Australia

2 Overview Definitions Bone strength and quality DXA and BMD
T-scores and interpretations Clinical applications

3 Definition of Osteoporosis (WHO)
A systematic skeleton disease characterized by: low bone mass microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue consequent increase in bone fragility and susceptibility to fracture Consensus Development Conference: Diagnosis, Prophylaxis, and Treatment of Osteoporosis, Am J Med 1993;94: WHO Study Group 1994.

4 Definition of Osteoporosis (NIH)
Osteoporosis is defined as a skeletal disorder characterized by: compromised bone strength predisposing a person to an increased risk of fracture. bone strength primarily reflects the integration of bone density and bone quality. (Source: NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis JAMA 285:785-95; 2001)

5 Osteoporosis Normal Osteopenia Osteoporosis

6 Normal bone Osteoporosis

7 Gain and loss of Bone throughout the lifespan
Pubertal Growth Spurt Menopause BMD Resorption Formation Age (Years)

8 BONE STRENGTH BONE MINERAL BONE QUALITY DENSITY Bone architechture
Gram of mineral per area Bone turnover Bone size & geometry

9 Bone mass, Bone mineral density (BMD)
Bone mass = the amount of bone tissue as the total of protein and mineral or the amount of mineral in the whole skeleton or in a particular segment of bone. (unmeasurable) BMD = the average concentration of mineral per unit area  assessed in 2 dimensions (measurable)

10 “Gold standard” DXA is the “gold standard” machine for measurement of BMD BMD is the “gold standard” to define osteoporosis Only use BMD measurements at central skeletal sites (i.e. hip or vertebrae) to define osteoporosis, but BMD measured at hip is more reliable.

11 Femoral neck BMD

12 Lumbar spine BMD

13 Hip BMD: Results

14 Relationship between BMD and Age
Peak Bone Mass and SD Relationship between BMD and Age (VN 2006, unpublished data)

15 T-scores Patient’s BMD – Young-adult mean BMD
1 SD of Young-adult mean BMD Example: peak bone mass (AU) = 1.00 ± 0.12 peak bone mass (VN) = 0.91 ± 0.11 T-score = 0.70 g/cm2 – 0.91 g/cm2 0.11 g/cm2 = T-score = 0.70 g/cm g/cm2 0.12 g/cm2 =

16 Diagnostic Classification
T-scores Normal ≥ - 1 Osteopenia Between -1 and -2.5 Osteoporosis ≤ -2.5 or less Severe Osteoporosis ≤ and fragility fracture WHO Study Group, 1994

17 (Source: Kanis JA et al. J Bone Miner Res. 1994;9:1137)
Why -2.5? “Such a cutoff value identifies approximately 30% of postmenopausal women as having osteoporosis using measurements made at the spine, hip or forearm. This is approximately equivalent to the lifetime risk of fracture at these sites.” (Source: Kanis JA et al. J Bone Miner Res. 1994;9:1137)

18 Z-scores Patient’s BMD – Age-Matched Mean BMD
1 SD of Age-Matched Mean BMD in g/cm2 Low Z-score (less than -2.0) may suggest increased likelihood of secondary osteoporosis, however . . . This is not validated in clinical trials High index of suspicion for secondary causes of osteoporosis is suggested in all patients

19 Why T-scores And Not Z-scores?
T-scores related to bone strength T-scores related to fracture risk Using Z-scores would result in many “normal” patients having fragility fractures, and suggest that osteoporosis does not increase with age

20 T-score Discordance Different skeletal sites have different peak bone mass at different times and lose bone at different rates Different technologies Different Region of Interests (ROIs) Different reference databases have different means and SD (the hip is the only skeletal site with a standardized reference database used by all manufacturers – National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III, NHANE III)

21 Rounding errors BMD values: 2 or 3 decimal points
T-scores, Z-scores: 1 decimal point ID Sex FNBMD (g/cm2) T-scores* Classification 1 F 0.704 -2.5 Osteoporosis 2 0.690 3 0.710 -2.4 Osteopenia 4 0.705 * Calculated based on young adult mean: / (g/cm2)

22 WHO definition Derived from studies of White postmenopausal (PM) women and apply to them Currently, no standard for: non-white PM women men

23 Prevalence of Osteoporosis
Using Vietnamese reference Using Caucasian reference (VN 2006, unpublished data)

24 BMD Values From Different Manufacturers Are Not Comparable
Different dual energy methods Different calibration Different detectors Different edge detection software Different regions of interest

25 Cut-off thresholds for diagnosis of Osteoporosis (Women)
Reference Device Women N Mean SD Osteopenia Osteoporosis (Looker, 1997) Hologic 409 Hip femoral neck 0.86 0.12 ≤ 0.56 trochanter 0.71 0.099 ≤ 0.46 intertrochanter 1.09 0.142 ≤ 0.74 total femur 0.94 0.122 ≤ 0.64 (Nguyen, 1998) Lunar 37 Femoral neck 1.00 ≤ 0.70 Lumbar spine 1.20 ≤ 0.90 (Tenenhouse, 2000) 95 0.857 0.125 ≤ 0.54 432 1.042 0.121

26 Cut-off thresholds for diagnosis of Osteoporosis (Men)
Reference Men    N Mean SD Osteopenia Osteoporosis (Looker, 1997) 382 Hip femoral neck 0.93 0.137 ≤ 0.59 trochanter 0.78 0.118 ≤ 0.49 intertrochanter 1.21 0.172 ≤ 0.78 total femur 1.04 0.144 ≤ 0.68 (Nguyen, 1998) 37 Femoral neck 0.12 ≤ 0.74 Lumbar spine 1.2 ≤ 0.90 (Tenenhouse, 2000) 101 0.91 0.125 ≤ 0.60 366 1.058 0.127

27 Indications For Bone Density Testing
All women age 65 and older All men age 70 and older Adults with a fragility fracture Adults with a disease or condition associated with low bone density Adults taking medication associated with low bone density Anyone being treated for low bone density to monitor treatment effect Anyone not receiving therapy, in whom evidence of bone loss would lead to treatment Women discontinuing treatment should be considered for bone density testing according to the indications listed above.

28 Indications For Bone Density Testing
All women age 65+ and men age 70+ Radiographic evidence of osteopenia or vertebral deformity or both Adult with previous fragility fracture Loss of height, thoracic kyphosis (after radiographic confirmation of vertebral deformities) Presence of strong risk factors: Anorexia nervosa Malabsorption syndromes Primary Hyperparathyroidism Post-transplantation Chronic renal failure Hyperthyroidism Prolonged immobilisation Cushing’s syndrome Oestrogen deficiency Corticosteroid therapy Premature menopause <45 y. Maternal family history of hip fracture Long-term secondary amenorrhoea >1y. Low body mass index (<19 Kg/m2) Primary hypogonadism Other disorder associated with osteoporosis (Source:Kanis JA, Lancet, 2002;359: )

29 Why Do Serial BMD Testing?
To monitor response to therapy by finding an increase or stability of bone density To evaluate for non-response by finding loss of bone density - suggesting the need for reevaluation of treatment and evaluation for secondary causes of osteoporosis To follow patients not being treated who are at risk of bone loss, in order to determine if treatment is needed

30 Screening for Osteoporosis: Bone Density Testing Guidelines
NOF1 AACE2 USPSTF3 BMD testing for: All women ≥65 years Younger postmenopausal women with one or more risk factors Postmenopausal women who present with fractures Pre- and postmenopausal women who have risk factors for fracture All women ≥40 years who have sustained a fracture Women beginning or receiving long-term glucocorticoid therapy Screening for: For women at increased risk for fractures, begin screening at age 60

31 Nomogram for predicting of osteoporosis in Women
29 66 69 Points 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Age (y) 35 45 55 65 75 85 Weight (kg) 95 QUS (T-scores) 4 3 2 1 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 Total Points 120 160 200 240 280 Risk of Osteoporosis 0.01 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.8 0.95 0.99 A woman of 65 yrs old, Weight = 45kg QUS T-score = -2.5 What is the probability for her developing of osteoporosis? 164 The risk for this woman developing of osteoporosis is ~ 60% Source: Pongchaiyakul C and Nguyen TV 2006, unpublished data

32 When Should Repeat BMD Testing Be Done?
When expected change in BMD equals or exceeds the “Least Significant Change” (LSC) Intervals between BMD testing should be determined according to each patient’s clinical status Consider one year after initiation or change of therapy Longer intervals once therapeutic effect is established Shorter intervals when rapid bone loss is expected

33 Peripheral BMD Testing Accurate & Precise
What it can do Predict fracture risk Tool for osteoporosis education What it cannot do Diagnose osteoporosis Monitor therapy A “normal” peripheral test does not necessarily mean that the patient does not have osteoporosis. WHO criteria do not apply to peripheral BMD testing.

34 Perspective T-scores: arbitrary
 Move away from T-scores, use absolute value and absolute risk.

35 Lời Cảm tạ Chúng tôi xin chân thành cám ơn Công ty Dược phẩm Bridge Healthcare, Australia là nhà tài trợ cho hội thảo.

36 Thank you!

37

38 Osteoporosis: Primary and Secondary
Bone loss that occurs with: age and sex steroid deficiency Bone loss caused, at least in part by: other diseases and/or medications

39 Peak Bone Mass and SD (VN 2006, unpublished data)


Download ppt "Interpretation of Bone mineral density"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google