Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Defense Trade Regulatory Requirements & National Security Reviews of Foreign Investment in the United States Presentation to IACC Aerospace, Defense &

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Defense Trade Regulatory Requirements & National Security Reviews of Foreign Investment in the United States Presentation to IACC Aerospace, Defense &"— Presentation transcript:

1 Defense Trade Regulatory Requirements & National Security Reviews of Foreign Investment in the United States Presentation to IACC Aerospace, Defense & Homeland Security Session Ajay Kuntamukkala, Partner May 24, 2012 International Trade / Washington D.C.

2 Agenda Overview Export Controls
History of U.S. Export Control Policy Towards India Export Administration Regulations International Traffic in Arms Regulations The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) Summary Matrix of Regulatory Issues Questions

3 Overview The aerospace, defense, and homeland security industries are highly regulated in the United States U.S. export controls apply to the transfer of technology, export and import of equipment, export of software and source code, and the employment of foreign persons in the United States Mergers, acquisitions, and joint ventures involving foreign entities may require national security reviews by CFIUS Indian companies, like other foreign companies, may be subject to these rules when they enter the U.S. market

4 U.S. Export Control Laws

5 History of U.S. Export Policy Towards India
Export controls policy is a key issue in the U.S.-India commercial relationship Exports controls affect only a small fraction of overall bilateral trade However, export controls are viewed by India as a significant strategic and economic issue History of technology denial Need for technology as a developing country U.S. has gradually liberalized its export controls regulations with regard to India to reflect India’s role as a strategic partner India is in the process of integrating into international export controls and nonproliferation regimes

6 History of U.S. Export Control Policy Regarding India
Post-Independence Era ( ) US-India Technology Cooperation Agreement Early nuclear cooperation: purchase of GE nuclear reactor for Tarapur Early space cooperation: India launches U.S. rocket at Thumba Era of Technology Denial ( ) NPT comes into force, India does not sign Zangger Committee established India’s first nuclear tests; nuclear cooperation with India ceases Nuclear Suppliers Group formed in response to Indian nuclear tests India’s second nuclear tests; range of sanctions imposed by U.S. Government Renaissance (2000-present) President Clinton visit and removal of certain sanctions against India President Bush waives remaining sanctions on India U.S.-India High Technology Cooperation Group Next Steps in Strategic Partnership U.S.-India Civil Nuclear Deal announced New Framework for US-India Defense Relationship signed End-Use Monitoring Arrangement; increased defense trade President Obama visit and subsequent removal of Indian firms from Entity List and agreement on other export control initiatives

7 U.S.-India Bilateral Understanding
On November 8, 2010, President Obama and Prime Minister Singh committed to strengthen bilateral cooperation on export controls and nonproliferation U.S. to support India’s full membership in Nuclear Suppliers Group, Missile Technology Control Regime, Australia Group, and Wassenaar Arrangement India to implement additional controls and meet requirements of each regime U.S. to remove Indian space and defense entities from the Entity List U.S. to realign U.S. export control licensing policy to reflect India’s status as a strategic partner, including removing India from list of “countries of concern” Expanded export control cooperation through U.S.-India High Technology Cooperation Group

8 Structure of U.S. Nuclear Export Controls
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Department of Energy Part 110 Regulations Part 810 Regulations Nuclear reactors, fuel cycle facilities, components and materials Nuclear technology and technical assistance Department of Commerce: Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) State Department: Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DTC) Additional U.S. Government agencies with possible jurisdiction over export activities include the Department of Energy (Nuclear Regulatory Commission), Food and Drug Administration, and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Export Administration Regulations (EAR) International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) Commercial and “dual use” commodities and technology Military items, including nuclear weapons

9 Export Administration Regulations
Administered by the Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) The EAR’s Commerce Control List (CCL) controls the export and reexport of commercial and “dual-use” (i.e., both commercial and military applications) goods, software and technology EAR also controls the transfer of certain technology to foreign persons, including Indian nationals, in the United States (“deemed exports”) Only a small fraction of exports to India now require export licenses from BIS In CY 2000, 24% of U.S. exports to India required export licenses In CY 2009, 0.3% of U.S. exports to India required export licenses

10 ITAR: Controlled Activities
Administered by State Department’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) Broad restrictions on exports, reexports, imports, and brokering of: Defense Articles Technical Data Defense Services Generally speaking, the ITAR are more restrictive than the EAR Manufacturers, exporters, and brokers are required to register with DDTC

11 ITAR: Controlled Activities
With limited exceptions, prior U.S. Government authorization required for: Exports and reexports of Defense Articles Exports and reexports of Technical Data to foreign persons (wherever located) Provision of Defense Services to foreign persons (wherever located) Temporary imports of Defense Articles or Technical Data Proposal to sell or manufacture certain Defense Articles Brokering transactions involving Defense Articles or Services

12 ITAR: Who Must Comply? All individuals located in the United States
U.S. citizens and permanent residents, wherever located Companies organized under U.S. laws and their employees, wherever located U.S. branches of non-U.S. companies Foreign entities and persons dealing in U.S.-origin Defense Articles (including Technical Data) or U.S.-origin Defense Services

13 ITAR: Licenses and Approvals
Primary types of licenses and approvals under the ITAR Permanent Export License (DSP-5) Temporary Export License (DSP-73) Temporary Import License (DSP-61) Agreements Technical Assistance Agreement (TAA) Manufacturing Licensing Agreement (MLA) Distribution Agreement Export license and agreements generally now bust be filed via D-Trade

14 Relevant ITAR Reform Initiatives
DDTC has not made any India-specific regulatory changes, but overall export control reform efforts should improve defense trade with India Ongoing reform of U.S. Munitions List (USML) Proposed rule on components (3/15/11) Proposed rule on defense services (4/13/11) Final rule on dual nationals and third-country nationals (5/16/11)

15 The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States

16 The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States
CFIUS created to conduct national security reviews of foreign investment and make recommendations to the President U.S. continues to maintain an open, non-discriminatory investment policy and to welcome foreign investment CFIUS mandated to conduct its reviews within context of overall investment policy; intended to ensure that foreign direct investment remains benign

17 Exon-Florio Amendment
Authorizes the review of any acquisition of control of a US business by a non-US entity to determine if the acquisition poses a threat to national security Grants the President the authority to block, restrict or order divestment of any such acquisition if he determines that there is a national security threat and no other law is adequate to deal with it President’s authority only terminates if transaction is reviewed and found not to threaten national security

18 Covered Transactions Under CFIUS
US Business Any entity engaged in US interstate commerce (even if foreign owned), but only to the extent of its activities in interstate commerce US business need not have separate legal identity; acquisition of a division that operates as a business meets the test. For Exon-Florio to apply, transaction must involve: A merger, acquisition or takeover By or with a foreign person Which could result in foreign control Of a US business Foreign government-controlled transactions Any covered transaction that could result in control of a US business, directly or indirectly, by a foreign government

19 CFIUS Procedures Process initiated by voluntary notice by parties to transaction Significant amount of information required from parties (target and acquirer) Submission of draft notice in advance of formal filing encouraged and often advisable CFIUS also might initiate its own review Review process has up to three formal stages Initial review – 30 days (CFIUS may request additional information from parties) CFIUS decides whether to proceed with an extended 45-day review (investigation) If CFIUS decides to pursue investigation, at end of 45 days CFIUS must present report to President President must make a decision within 15 days

20 Regulatory Issues Relevant to Indian Corporations in the U. S
Regulatory Issues Relevant to Indian Corporations in the U.S. Aerospace, Defense, and Homeland Security Industry CFIUS ITAR EAR Acquisition of U.S. Company ITAR Registration 60-Day Notification Exports/Imports Technology Transfer Employment of Foreign Persons Exports Establishing Joint Ventures in the U.S. Establishing a U.S. Branch or Greenfield Operation Supplying Equipment or Services to U.S. Government or U.S. Company

21 www.hoganlovells.com Hogan Lovells has offices in: Abu Dhabi Alicante
Amsterdam Baltimore Beijing Berlin Brussels Budapest* Caracas Colorado Springs Denver Dubai Dusseldorf Frankfurt Hamburg Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Hong Kong Houston Jeddah* London Los Angeles Madrid Miami Milan Moscow Munich New York Northern Virginia Paris Philadelphia Prague Riyadh* Rome San Francisco Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Ulaanbaatar* Warsaw Washington DC Zagreb* "Hogan Lovells" or the "firm" refers to the international legal practice comprising Hogan Lovells International LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Hogan Lovells Worldwide Group (a Swiss Verein), and their affiliated businesses, each of which is a separate legal entity. Hogan Lovells International LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC Registered office and principal place of business: Atlantic House, Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2FG. Hogan Lovells US LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in the District of Columbia. The word "partner" is used to refer to a member of Hogan Lovells International LLP or a partner of Hogan Lovells US LLP, or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications, and to a partner, member, employee or consultant in any of their affiliated businesses who has equivalent standing. Rankings and quotes from legal directories and other sources may refer to the former firms of Hogan & Hartson LLP and Lovells LLP. Where case studies are included, results achieved do not guarantee similar outcomes for other clients. New York State Notice: Attorney Advertising. © Hogan Lovells All rights reserved. * Associated offices


Download ppt "Defense Trade Regulatory Requirements & National Security Reviews of Foreign Investment in the United States Presentation to IACC Aerospace, Defense &"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google