Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Social Psychology 2 Josée L. Jarry, Ph.D., C.Psych.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Social Psychology 2 Josée L. Jarry, Ph.D., C.Psych."— Presentation transcript:

1 Social Psychology 2 Josée L. Jarry, Ph.D., C.Psych.
Introduction to Psychology Department of Psychology University of Toronto July 2, 2003

2 Social Influence on Behaviour
Social Pressure Social Impact Theory Self-monitoring Theory Social facilitation and Interference Conformity Obedience Cooperation

3 Social Pressure Concerns for other’s judgement
The entire set of psychological forces that are exerted on an individual by other people or by the individual’s beliefs about other people People care about what others think of them It is a powerful source of pressure to do what we believe others want us to do

4 The Field Theory Kurt Lewin (1951) Forces from within
developed a theory that compares social pressure with physical forces people exist in a field of forces that push or pull them in various directions Forces from within the person's own self perceived desires, goals, and abilities Forces of social pressure the person's perception of other people's expectations or desires

5

6 Social Impact Theory Bibb Latané (1981)
the theory identifies factors that increase or decrease social pressure predicts the impact of social pressure on the person at any given time factors are understood in terms of sources of social pressure

7 Social Pressure & Sources
Number of sources number of people perceived by the target person as exerting pressure Strength of a source the degree to which that person's opinions are valued by the target person Immediacy of a source the physical or psychological proximity of that person to the target person, either in physical distance or as prominence in memory

8

9 Impression Management
The entire set of ways by which people consciously and unconsciously modify their behaviour to influence others’ impressions of them Because we care what others think of us, we strive to influence of their thoughts

10 Self-Monitoring Mark Snyder (1974) High self-monitors
The degree to which people project a varied impression of themselves as they go from audience to audience High self-monitors watch themselves vigilantly to assess how they must look to others adjust their behaviour accordingly Low self-monitors are less vigilant in self-scrutiny greater consistency in behaviour

11 Items from the Self-monitoring Scale

12 Social Facilitation & Interference
Early experiments in social psychology showed that people performed tasks better when one or more observers were present than they did when alone Other experiments, however, demonstrated an opposite effect: social interference

13 Social Facilitation & Interference
Robert Zajonc (1965) the presence of others facilitates performance of dominant (habitual, simple, or instinctive) actions and interferes with performance of non-dominant (non habitual, complex, or unnatural) actions Arousal facilitates performance of dominant or simple, well learned tasks worsens the performance of non-dominant or complex, poorly learned tasks

14 Conformity (1) Informational influence Normative influence
other people's behaviour provides information about the nature of a situation or an event Normative influence stems from the person's desire to be part of the group and to have other people's approval conforming promotes group cohesion and acceptance by the group Conformity is essential to group cohesion

15 Conformity (2) Solomon Asch (1956)
Asch's original purpose was to demonstrate the limits of conformity He did his work in the early 1950s when conformity was very strong Asch expected to demonstrate that people will not conform when evidence is very clear

16 Conformity Explained Informational influence Normative influence
subjects claimed that they doubted their own perceptual ability Normative influence when confederates responded out loud as before, but the subjects responded privately in writing, the amount of conformity dropped to about one-third of that in the earlier experiments

17 Conformity and Helping (1)
Latané & Rodin (1969) 70 % of those who witness an accident alone provide help only 20 % of those who witness an accident in pairs provide help Apparently an accident victim is better off with just one potential helper present than with two

18 Conformity and Helping (2)
Diffusion of responsibility the more people present, the less any one person feels it is their responsibility to help Informational influence other’s action or inaction is a source of information Normative influence other’s inaction establishes an implicit social norm fear of evaluation

19 Influence of others’ requests: Obedience
Obedience refers to those cases of compliance in which the person making the request is perceived as an authority figure or a leader The request is perceived as an order or a command Obedience has evolutionary value

20 Obedience Stanley Milgram (1960s)
conducted a series of experiments at Yale University. was impressed by events like the Holocaust of World War II the Nazis claimed that they were simply obeying orders Milgram wanted to test that claim

21 Obedience Explained Pre-existing beliefs Diffusion of responsibility
volunteers’ faith in the value of science Diffusion of responsibility the experimenter took responsibility The immediacy of the experimenter obedience declined when the experimenter was not in the room Conformity a non-conforming confederate caused a decline in obedience

22


Download ppt "Social Psychology 2 Josée L. Jarry, Ph.D., C.Psych."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google