Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

AMENDED LAWS FOR UTILITY COORDINATION 2009 AASHTO R/W & Utilities Subcommittee Conference April 22 nd.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "AMENDED LAWS FOR UTILITY COORDINATION 2009 AASHTO R/W & Utilities Subcommittee Conference April 22 nd."— Presentation transcript:

1 AMENDED LAWS FOR UTILITY COORDINATION 2009 AASHTO R/W & Utilities Subcommittee Conference April 22 nd

2 “You either pay now or pay later - Pick your poison” PAY NOW… Avoid unnecessary relocations Resolve all foreseeable conflicts OR PAY LATER… Delays Damages Claims Increased costs

3 DID YOU KNOW? What the State Utilities Engineer looked like in 2000?

4 DID YOU KNOW? 2000 2008

5 CWP vs. Utility Delays

6 FY 2008 Construction Time Extensions

7 RECENT EXAMPLES OF PROJECTS DELAYED  US-441 Dublin:206 days - $1.18 million  SR-92 Douglas Co:334 days - $1.92 million  SR-166 Douglas Co:309 days - $ 113 thousand  Mercer Univ. Bibb Co:577 days - $3.78 million  Fury’s Ferry Road:457 days  (Augusta)

8 Utility Time Extensions – Detail FY 2005 Study

9 Utility Mitigation Efforts  GDOT Board & Commissioner: Initiated Utility Task Force  August 2005  Internal/GDOT Policies & Procedures 43% Lack of Project/Utility Coordination

10 Utility Mitigation Efforts  State Utilities Office  Electronic Data Guidelines (EDG) / Automated Drafting Design System (ADDS)  Plan Presentation Guide (PPG)  Plan Development Process (PDP)  Consultant Management Process Improvement (CMPI)  Consultant Cost Proposal Standardization  Geographical Information System (GIS)  Performance Based Contracting  Field Plan Review Checklists

11 Utility Mitigation Efforts  State Utilities Office  Utility Design/Build Specification  Field Plan Review Inspections  Office of Utilities Web Page  Electronic Plans Transfer Guidelines  Environmental Issues  Created Utility Task Force 4 Subcommittee Teams (R/W Team – monthly reports)  Training and Education  Notice of Award & Authorization letters

12 Utility Mitigation Efforts  State Utilities Office  Electronic Receipt and Submittal of Utility Invoices  Electronic Submittal of Utility Agreements  Utility Plans  Re-Engineering Organizational Structure  Utility Redline Software  Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE)  SUE Program Enhancement  Utility Accommodation Policy & Standards Manual

13 Utility Mitigation Efforts  State Utilities Office  Utility Coordination Scope of Services  Move to New GDOT Headquarters (Apr. ‘08)  Georgia Utility Permitting System (GUPS)  TRAQS  TPRO  CMIS  PeopleSoft Privileges  Utility Phase Funding Early Authorizations & Master Agreements for PE

14 Utility Mitigation Efforts  State Utilities Office  GA PSC – Large Projects  Locator Certification  AASHTO Best Practices  SHRP – R-15 Utility Coordination Study  Awards and Recognitions  Senate Bill 19 – Legislative Session 2007

15 Utility Mitigation Efforts  Senate Bill 19  Accountability  (PIF) Contract Items $$ - GDOT fund  PDP Deadlines  Mediation Rule/Jan. ‘08 Project lettings May ‘08 19% Low Priority 28% Lack of Resources

16 PROPOSED MEDIATION RULE 672-19 Legislative Intent Applicability Time Period Escalation Process Mediation Board & Procedures Costs Decisions / Mediation Period

17 OVERVIEW OF MEDIATION RULE & PROCESS  LEGISLATIVE INTENT Mediation less expensive than Litigation

18 OVERVIEW OF MEDIATION RULE & PROCESS  APPLICABILITY Three (3) Types of Disputes WORK PLAN REVISED WORK PLAN ANY OTHER MATTER  TIME PERIOD FOR APPLICABILITY  May 2008 Letting

19 OVERVIEW OF MEDIATION RULE & PROCESS  ESCALATION PROCESS Notice of Potential Dispute to Utility Structured Negotiation Process (Formalizing Communication) Prerequisite to the Mediation Board

20 GDOT Project Development Utility Relocation Funding & Mediation Process

21 OVERVIEW OF MEDIATION RULE & PROCESS  MEDIATION BOARD & PROCEDURES 3 Member Board Qualified by State Office of Dispute Resolution Written Petition for Mediation Board established w/in 30 days Hearing held w/in 60 days No Direct Relationship (contractually or employed) w/in previous 6 months

22 OVERVIEW OF MEDIATION RULE & PROCESS  COSTS Utility & GDOT – Pay for Member Selected Utility & GDOT – Equally pay for 3 rd Member Party Acts in Bad Faith May be responsible for All costs

23 OVERVIEW OF MEDIATION RULE & PROCESS  DECISIONS / MEDIATION PERIOD Majority Vote – No Ties Public Document Subject to Judicial Review (Superior Court) An Agreement is reached or 60 days Can extend if mutually agreed by the parties

24 GDOT Resources – Office of Utilities – Office of Construction – Office of Construction Claims – Legal Services – District Offices

25 Time Extensions Related to Utility Delays

26 References SENATE BILL 19 http://www.legis.ga.gov/legis/2007_08/sum/sb19.htm ( Click on “ Current Version ” and you should be able to view) GDOT RULE – CHAPTER 672-19 GOVERNING UTILITIES MEDIATION PROCESS ( Georgia Secretary of State website – http://sos.georgia.gov/rules_regs.htm ) ESCALATION POLICY (GDOT website – Chapters 2 & 4 of the UAM: http://www.dot.ga.gov/doingbusiness/utilities/Pages/default.aspx)

27 Questions? State Utilities Office 404-631-1354 jbaker@dot.ga.gov web site: www.dot.ga.gov

28 THAT’S ALL FOLKS


Download ppt "AMENDED LAWS FOR UTILITY COORDINATION 2009 AASHTO R/W & Utilities Subcommittee Conference April 22 nd."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google