Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDella Baldwin Modified over 8 years ago
1
“Internal versus external oriented quality control mecanisms in public administration training and education programmes: Lessons drawn from the french Ecole nationale d’administration” Dr. Fabrice Larat Director, Research centre on public administration Ecole nationale d’administration,France fabrice.larat@ena.fr
2
The puzzle Starting point : Link between performing public administration and well trained public servants Need to develop training programmes preparing to a performing administration Which kind of performance measurement and quality control in public administration training programmes? How to combine performance achievement and a high level of quality?
3
1.Quality improvement and performance in public management education and training 2.Quality improvement and performance: what are we exactly talking about ? 3.Quality control system and performance measurement at ENA 4.The challenge of combining both quality and performance improvement Paper outline
5
2. The four sources of information available for performance evaluation and quality control in public administration training and education Assessment by the direct benificiaries of the programme Students Future employers Standards and best practices Assessment by the end users of the public administration programme Essential The quality control strategy to follow for the programme, must be chosen in accordance with its priorities and objectives and depending on the mission of the institute or school in charge of conducting it Teaching staff Assessment by the experts in charge of teaching Public administration programme Self-centred evaluation External oriented evaluation Orientation towards internationally acknowledged criteria of excellence as well as benchmarking How to combine the different possible sources together?
6
The triangle of performance analysis Objectives Means Results Relevance Efficiency Effectivenes s
8
4. Striving for coherence : The three steps of the evaluation process a) Collect of information Available and accessible data Reliability and representativeness Comparability Meaningful b)Analysis of quality and of performance indicators Combining different kinds and sources of information to make a contradictory analysis Taking the context into account The assessment of performance must be coherent with regard to the programme’s objectives c)Reaction (= Undertaking necessary measures to improve quality and performance) Justified Relevant Appropriate Feasible Efficient
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.