Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Unitarity and Factorisation in Quantum Field Theory Zurich Zurich 2008 David Dunbar, Swansea University, Wales, UK VERSUS Unitarity and Factorisation in.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Unitarity and Factorisation in Quantum Field Theory Zurich Zurich 2008 David Dunbar, Swansea University, Wales, UK VERSUS Unitarity and Factorisation in."— Presentation transcript:

1 Unitarity and Factorisation in Quantum Field Theory Zurich Zurich 2008 David Dunbar, Swansea University, Wales, UK VERSUS Unitarity and Factorisation in Quantum Field Theory

2 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 2/48 -conjectured weak-weak duality between Yang-Mills and Topological string theory in 2003 inspired flurry of activity in perturbative field theory -look at what has transpired -much progress in perturbation theory at both many legs and many loops (See Lance Dixon tommorow) -unitarity -factorisation -QCD -gravity

3 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 3/48 Objective Theory Experiment precise predictions We want technology to calculate these predictions quickly, flexibly and accurately -despite our successes we have a long way to go

4 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 4/48 QFT S-matrix theory String Theory Strings and QFT both have S-matrices -can link help with QFT?

5 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 5/48 -not first time string theory inspired field theory -symmetry is important: embedding your theory in one with more symmetry might help understanding - Parke-Taylor MHV formulae string inspired -Bern-Kosower Rules for one-loop amplitudes  ’  0

6 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 6/48 Duality with String Theory Witten’s proposed of Weak-Weak duality between A) Yang-Mills theory ( N=4 ) B) Topological String Theory with twistor target space -Since this is a `weak-weak` duality perturbative S-matrix of two theories should be identical - True for tree level gluon scattering Rioban, Spradlin,Volovich

7 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 7/48 Is the duality useful? Theory A : hard, interesting hard, interesting Theory B: easy Perturbative QCD, hard, interesting Topological String Theory : harder -duality may be useful indirectly

8 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 8/48 -but can be understood in field theory + _ _ _ _ _ + + + + + + _ _ _ -eg MHV vertex construction of tree amplitudes -promote MHV amplitude to a fundamental vertex -inspired by scattering of instantons in topological strings Cachazo, Svercek, Witten Rioban, Spradlin, Volovich Mansfield, Ettle, Morris, Gorsky - and by factorisation Risager -works better than expected Brandhuber, Spence Travaglini

9 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 9/48 Organisation of QCD amplitudes: divide amplitude into smaller physical pieces -QCD gluon scattering amplitudes are the linear combination of Contributions from supersymmetric multiplets -use colour ordering; calculate cyclically symmetric partial amplitudes -organise according to helicity of external gluon

10 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 10/48 Passarino-Veltman reduction of 1-loop Decomposes a n-point integral into a sum of (n-1) integral functions obtained by collapsing a propagator -coefficients are rational functions of |k i § using spinor helicity -feature of Quantum Field Theory cut construcible

11 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 11/48 One-Loop QCD Amplitudes One Loop Gluon Scattering Amplitudes in QCD -Four Point : Ellis+Sexton, Feynman Diagram methods -Five Point : Bern, Dixon,Kosower, String based rules -Six-Point : lots of People, lots of techniques

12 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 12/48 The Six Gluon one-loop amplitude 94 05 06 05 06 05 06 - --- - - 93 Bern, Dixon, Dunbar, Kosower Bern, Bjerrum-Bohr, Dunbar, Ita Bidder, Bjerrum-Bohr, Dixon, Dunbar Bedford, Brandhuber, Travaglini, Spence Britto, Buchbinder, Cachazo, Feng Bern, Chalmers, Dixon, Kosower Mahlon Xiao,Yang, Zhu Berger, Bern, Dixon, Forde, Kosower Forde, Kosower Britto, Feng, Mastriolia 81% `B’ ~13 papers

13 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 13/48 94 05 06 05 06 05 06 - --- - - 93 The Six Gluon one-loop amplitude Difficult/Complexity unitarity recursion feynman MHV

14 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 14/48 The Seven Gluon one-loop amplitude

15 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 15/48 (++++++)1 (-+++++)6 (--++++)12 (-+-+++)12 (-++-++)6 (---+++)6 (--+-++)12 (-+-+-+)2 -specify colour structure, 8 independent helicities - supersymmetric approximations -for fixed colour structure we have 64 helicity structures

16 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 16/48 N=4SUSY (--++++)0.320.04 (-+-+++)0.300.04 (-++-++)0.370.04 (---+++)0.160.06 (--+-++)0.360.04 (-+-+-+)0.130.02 QCD is almost supersymmetric…. (looking at the finite pieces) -working at the specific kinematic point of Ellis, Giele and Zanderaghi

17 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 17/48 Unitarity Methods -look at the two-particle cuts -use unitarity to identify the coefficients

18 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 18/48 Topology of Cuts -look when K is timelike, in frame where K=(K 0,0,0,0) l 1 and l 2 are back to back on surface of sphere imposing an extra condition

19 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 19/48 Generalised Unitarity -use info beyond two-particle cuts

20 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 20/48 Box-Coefficients -works for massless corners (complex momenta) Britto,Cachazo,Feng or signature (--++)

21 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 21/48 Unitarity Techniques -turn C 2 into coefficients of integral functions Different ways to approach this reduction to covariant integrals fermionic analytic structure

22 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 22/48 Reduction to covariant integrals -advantages: connects to conventional reduction technique -converts integral into n-point integrals -convert fermionic variables

23 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 23/48 -linear triangle in the two-particle cut kbkb P

24 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 24/48 Fermionic Unitarity -use analytic structure to identify terms within two- particle cuts -advantages: two-dimensional rather than four dimensional, merges nicely with amplitudes written in terms of spinor variables bubbles Britto, Buchbinder,Cachazo, Feng, Mastrolia

25 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 25/48 Analytic Structure z K1K1 K2K2 -triple cut reduces to problem in complex analysis -real momenta corresponds to unit circle poles at z=0 are triangles functions poles at z  0 are box coefficients Forde

26 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 26/48 Unitarity -works well to calculate coefficients -particularly strong for supersymmetry (R=0) -can be automated -extensions to massive particles progressing Ellis, Giele, Kunszt ;Ossola, Pittau, Papadopoulos Berger Bern Dixon Febres-Cordero Forde Ita Kosower Maitre Ellis, Giele, Kunzst, Melnikov Britto, Feng Yang; Britto, Feng Mastrolia Badger, Glover, Risager Anastasiou, Britto, Feng, Kunszt, Mastrolia Mastrolia

27 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 27/48 How do we calculate R? D- dimensional Unitarity Factorisation/Recursion Feynman Diagrams

28 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 28/48 Feynman Diagrams? -in general F a polynomial of degree n in l - only the maximal power of l contributes to rational terms -extracting rational might be feasible using specialised reduction Binoth, Guillet, Heinrich

29 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 29/48 D-dimensional Unitarity -in dimensional regularisation amplitudes have an extra -2  momentum weight -consequently rational parts of amplitudes have cuts to O(  ) -consistently working with D- dimensional momenta should allow us to determine rational terms -these must be D-dimensional legs Van Neerman Britto Feng Mastrolia Bern,Dixon,dcd, Kosower Bern Morgan Brandhuber, Macnamara, Spence Travaglini Kilgore

30 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 30/48 Factorisation 1) Amplitude will be singular at special Kinematic points, with well understood factorisation Bern, Chalmers e.g. one-loop factorisation theorem K is multiparticle momentum invariant 2) Amplitude does not have singularities elsewhere : at spurious singular points

31 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 31/48 On-shell Recursion: tree amplitudes Shift amplitude so it is a complex function of z Tree amplitude becomes an analytic function of z, A(z) -Full amplitude can be reconstructed from analytic properties Britto,Cachazo,Feng (and Witten)

32 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 32/48 Provided, Residues occur when amplitude factorises on multiparticle pole (including two-particles) then

33 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 33/48 -results in recursive on-shell relation Tree Amplitudes are on-shell but continued to complex momenta (three-point amplitudes must be included) 12 (c.f. Berends-Giele off shell recursion)

34 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 34/48 Recursion for Loops? cut construcible recursive? -amplitude is a mix of cut constructible pieces and rational

35 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 35/48 Recursion for Rational terms -can we shift R and obtain it from its factorisation? 1)Function must be rational 2)Function must have simple poles 3)We must understand these poles Berger, Bern, Dixon, Forde and Kosower -requires auxiliary recusion limits for large-z terms

36 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 36/48 recursive? Recursion on Integral Coefficients Consider an integral coefficient and isolate a coefficient and consider the cut. Consider shifts in the cluster. r-r- r+1 + + + + - - - - -we obtain formulae for integral coefficients for both the N=1 and scalar cases Bern, Bjerrum-Bohr, dcd, Ita

37 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 37/48 Spurious Singularities -spurious singularities are singularities which occur in Coefficients but not in full amplitude -need to understand these to do recursion -link coefficients together Bern, Dixon Kosower Campbell, Glover Miller Bjerrum-Bohr, dcd, Perkins

38 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 38/48 -amplitude has sixth order pole in [12] 1 3 4 2 s=0, h 1 2 i  0 -spurious which only appears if we use complex momentum -just how powerful is factorisation? -unusual example : four graviton, one loop scattering dcd, Norridge

39 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 39/48 u/t =-1 -s/t, expand in s 1 3 4 2 - together with symmetry of amplitude, demanding poles vanish completely determines the entire amplitude dcd, H Ita -so the, very easy to compute, box coefficient determines rest of amplitude

40 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 40/48 UV structure of N=8 Supergravity -is N=8 Supergravity a self-consistent QFT -progress in methods allows us to examine the perturbative S-matrix -Does the theory have ultra-violet singularities or is it a ``finite’’ field theory

41 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 41/48 Superstring Theory 2) Look at supergravity embedded within string theory N=8 Supergravity 1) Approach problem within the theory Dual Theory 3) Find a dual theory which is solvable Green, Russo, Van Hove, Berkovitz, Chalmers Abou-Zeid, Hull, Mason ``Finite for 8 loops but not beyond’’

42 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 42/48 -results/suggestions -the S-matrix is UV softer than one would expect. Has same behaviour as N=4 SYM True at one-loop ``No-triangle Hypothesis’’ True for 4pt 3-loop calculation Is N=8 finite like N=4 SYM?

43 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 43/48 N=8 Supergravity Loop polynomial of n-point amplitude of degree 2n. Leading eight-powers of loop momentum cancel (in well chosen gauges..) leaving (2n-8) or (2r-8) Beyond 4-point amplitude contains triangles and bubbles but only after reduction Expect triangles n > 4, bubbles n >5, rational n > 6 r

44 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 44/48 No-Triangle Hypothesis -against this expectation, it might be the case that……. Evidence? true for 4pt n-point MHV 6-7pt NMHV proof Bern,Dixon,Perelstein,Rozowsky Bjerrum-Bohr, dcd,Ita, Perkins, Risager; Bern, Carrasco, Forde, Ita, Johansson, Green,Schwarz,Brink Bjerrum-Bohr Van Hove -extra n-4 cancelations

45 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 45/48 Three Loops Result  SYM: K 3D-18 Sugra: K 3D-16 Finite for D=4,5, Infinite D=6 -actual for Sugra -again N=8 Sugra looks like N=4 SYM Bern, Carrasco, Dixon, Johansson, Kosower and Roiban, 07

46 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 46/48 -the finiteness or otherwise of N=8 Supergravity is still unresolved although all explicit results favour finiteness -does it mean anything? Possible to quantise gravity with only finite degrees of freedom. -is N=8 supergravity the only finite field theory containing gravity? ….seems unlikely….N=6/gauged…. Rockall versus Tahiti

47 Emil Bjerrum-Bohr, IAS, UCLA Harald Ita, UCLA Warren Perkins TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: A A A A Kasper Risager, NBI Bjerrum-Bohr, Dunbar, Ita, Perkins and Risager, ``The no-triangle hypothesis for N = 8 supergravity,'‘ JHEP 0612 (2006) 072, hep-th/0610043. May 2006 to present: all became fathers 5 real +2 virtual children

48 D Dunbar, Gauge Theory and Strings, ETH 48/48 Conclusions -new techniques for NLO gluon scattering -progress driven by very physical developments: unitarity and factorisation -amplitudes are over constrained -nice to live on complex plane (or with two times) -still much to do: extend to less specific problems -important to finish some process -is N=8 supergravity finite


Download ppt "Unitarity and Factorisation in Quantum Field Theory Zurich Zurich 2008 David Dunbar, Swansea University, Wales, UK VERSUS Unitarity and Factorisation in."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google