1. PowerPoint Slides for Professors Spring 2010 Version PowerPoint Slides for Professors Spring 2010 Version This file as well as all other PowerPoint files for the book, “Risk Management and Insurance: Perspectives in a Global Economy” authored by Skipper and Kwon and published by Blackwell (2007), has been created solely for classes where the book is used as a text. Use or reproduction of the file for any other purposes, known or to be known, is prohibited without prior written permission by the authors. Visit the following site for updates: http://facpub.stjohns.edu/~kwonw/Blackwell.htmlhttp://facpub.stjohns.edu/~kwonw/Blackwell.html. To change the slide design/background, [View]  [Slide Master] W. Jean Kwon, Ph.D., CPCU School of Risk Management, St. John’s University 101 Murray Street New York, NY 10007, USA Phone: +1 (212) 277-5196 E-mail: Kwonw@stjohns.eduKwonw@stjohns.edu

2. Risk Management and Insurance: Perspectives in a Global Economy 15. Risk Management for Catastrophes Click Here to Add Professor and Course Information

3. Study Points  Risk analysis  Risk control  Risk financing 3 http://www.wmo.ch/pages/prog/dpm/images/collage.gif

4. Risk Analysis 4

5.  Analysis of potentially catastrophic events largely identical to those for non-catastrophic event, except: Devotion of greater time and effort to exploring the susceptibility of the entity’s physical structure to damage. Common reliance more heavily on modeling Scenario planning can play a significant role. 5

6. Susceptibility to Damage  Design features and construction quality The tradeoff between cost and quality Causes of damage Natural Human-made (e.g., terrorists or disgruntled employees)  Age of structures The Great Hanshin (Kobe) Earthquake in Japan in 1995  Infrastructure Transportation and communication facilities of the affected area Critical to a prompt and orderly recovery Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans in 2005 in the U.S. 6

7. 7 http://katrina.house.gov/

8. Catastrophe Modeling  The use of computer-assisted mathematical techniques to estimate possible losses associated with catastrophic events Use of site and specific property characteristics (the so-called “exposure data”)  Primarily for natural catastrophes such as hurricanes, earthquakes, storms, floods Some for terrorism (e.g., AIR modeling)  Widely used by insurers, reinsurers and intermediaries Figure 15.1 for a natural catastrophe model 8

9. Natural Catastrophe Risk Modeling (Figure 15.1) 9 Description of the model in pages 376- 377.

10. Scenario Planning  Analysts generate simulation games that are used by management to consider and develop plans to deal with alternative futures  Scenarios bring forth decisions by the ultimately responsible persons. Subsumes elements that are difficult and often impossible to formalize, let alone quantify  Cause decision-makers to realize that they consciously or unconsciously likely have a preconceived notion of what the “official future” will hold. Insight 15.1 Figure 15.2 10

11. Closed Strategic Management Loop 11 Construct Multiple Scenarios Devise Strategic Plan Based on Scenarios Implement Strategies Monitor the Environment and Strategic Implementation

12. Terrorism Risk Analysis  Protection priority High priority Medium priority Low priority  Hazard and vulnerability assessment Defining threats Identifying likely threat event profile and tactics Assignment of a threat rating 12 Go also to FEMA for additional information.FEMA Go also to FEMA for additional information.FEMA

13. Risk Control 13

14. Loss Prevention  Land use restrictions  Building codes  Disaster planning The U.S. – A Failure of Initiative, a report about government preparedness against disasters – Hurricane Katrina and New Orleans Insight 15.3 (Home Depot’s reactions to the hurricane) The E.U. – The Environmental Integration Manual 14

15. Loss Reduction  Crisis management The process of identifying those situations that constitute a crisis, having an organized response to the crisis and ultimately resolving the crisis  The process Engage appropriate employees to consider the range of crises Develop responses for each identified crisis, including a master plan Assign clear recovery responsibilities to individuals Speak with one voice and through one high-level person Keep employees, customers, other stakeholders and the public well informed by honestly and openly sharing the nature of the difficulty and what the organization is doing about it 15

16. Loss Reduction – Corporate Viewpoint  The importance of effective crisis management – “sustainable risk management”  Corporate catastrophes and shareholder value  Reputation crises and shareholder value  Mass fatality events and shareholder value 16

17. Loss Reduction  Insight 15.4 (Tylenol case)  Insight 15.5 (Boycott)  Insight 15.6 (Reputation loss)  Figure 15.4 (Reaction of Share Prices to Mass Fatality Events) 17 http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/9641/71374286xv4.jpg

18. Share Price and Reputation Crisis (Figure 15.3) 18

19. Share Price and Mass Fatality Event (Figure 15.4) 19

20. Risk Financing 20

21. Retention  Recommended when Insurance is unavailable or unaffordable Property owners have the capability of financing losses internally  Retention is often used along with other risk financing options. For example, excess insurance on top of large retention  The problems with retention are vividly demonstrated when a catastrophe occurs. Especially in developing countries 21

22. Insurance  Risk financing capacity for catastrophic loss exposures remains a major concern for the insurance industry internationally  Insurance policies often exclude coverage for many catastrophic events. Nuclear-related events Flood damages Earth movement Terrorist act Countrywide variations exist. 22

23. Insurance – Catastrophe Reinsurance  Often a risk-financing and loss-sharing arrangement between insurance firms  Several reinsurers that specialize in catastrophe reinsurance The Caribbean The London market 23

24. Insurance – Private Risk Pools  A wide array of uses by insurance companies Residual markets for nonstandard drivers in automobile insurance or employers in workers’ compensation  A case of catastrophic loss exposure – nuclear activity The World Nuclear Association OECD’s Paris Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy of 1960 (amended in 2004) The Price-Anderson Act in 1957 (U.S.) Insight 15.7 24

25. Nuclear Insurance Coverage (Insight 15.7)  Facility form (liability) policy  Secondary financial protection policy  Master worker policy  Suppliers and transporters policy 25

26. Insurance – Government Risk Pools (CEA) 26 $1.0 $3.0 $2.0 $1.0 $1.5 $2.0 Assessment against insurers Reinsurance Line of credit Reinsurance Additional commitments from insurers Insurers' Initial Capital Contributions CEA (www.earthquakeauthority.com)

27. Insurance – Terrorism Risk  Australia – Australian Reinsurance Pool  Austria – Terrorpool Austria  France – GAREAT  Germany – Extremus  Israel – The Property and Tax Compensation Fund  The Netherlands – NHT  Spain – CCS  South Africa – SASRIA  The U.K. – Pool Re  The U.S. – Terrorism Risk and Insurance Act 27 Table 15.1

28. Catastrophe Risk Securitization – Cat Bonds 28 Institutional Investors Catastrophe Risk SPV (Reinsurer + Bond Issuer) Premium Coverage Investment Principal + Return Insurer (Reinsurer) Premium Coverage Investment Bank (Bond Underwriting + Rating) Escrow Account (Bond Investment) Not in the book.

29. Discussion Questions 29

30. Discussion Question 1  Older facilities often are more susceptible to damage than newer ones. Explain why this is so and make a case for why the government should not require that the owners of such older facilities to upgrade them to contemporary structural standards? 30

31. Discussion Question 2  Loss mitigation is a fundamental factor in better managing the physical environment risk. What aspects of loss mitigation do you believe offer the most promise for the future? 31

32. Discussion Question 3  Develop at least two “alternative futures” for how risk management might change for operators of nuclear power plants. 32

33. Discussion Question 4  If sound crisis management is as important as suggested in this chapter, why do major corporations seem to accord it so little attention? 33

34. Discussion Question 5  We have described terrorism risk pools in selected countries. Find the reasons why some governments listed in the table acted upon creation of a terrorism insurance scheme before September 11, 2001. Do you find any other governments offering similar programs? (Hint: Examine Brazil, Finland, Hong Kong and Japan for possible programs.) 34