Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

CPC Driver in the EU: Implementation Status Directive 2003/59 on the initial qualification and periodic training of drivers of certain road vehicles for.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CPC Driver in the EU: Implementation Status Directive 2003/59 on the initial qualification and periodic training of drivers of certain road vehicles for."— Presentation transcript:

1 CPC Driver in the EU: Implementation Status Directive 2003/59 on the initial qualification and periodic training of drivers of certain road vehicles for the carriage of passengers & goods Damian Viccars Head - Social Affairs and EU Road Safety (c) IRU Academy 2012 Paris, 7 June 2012

2 Transposing the Directive (c) IRU Academy 2012

3 Implementation: a shared responsability The professional driver is at the heart of a set of systems implying a multiplicity of stakeholders: the company, trainers, the social partners, Member States and the EU. 3 Member State Social partners Trainers Company Drivers (c) IRU Academy 2012

4 Article 3: Qualification and Training Source: EC DG Transport Transposition

5 Initial qualification process Option 1: course attendance and test Option 1: course attendance and test Option 2: test only Option 2: test only Both systems Both systems (c) IRU Academy 2012

6 Source: EC DG Transport Initial Qualification Article 5: Age limits Drivers of vehicles intended for the carriage of goods may drive: From the age of 18: accelerated initial qualification C1, C1+E (art 6.2) initial qualification C, C+E (art 6.1) From the age of 21: accelerated initial qualification C, C+E (art 6.2) (c) IRU Academy 2012

7 Article 8: Certifying Periodic Training Vehicle: C1, C1+E and C, C+E (c) IRU Academy 2012 Periodic Training & Transition Periods Source: EC DG Transport Unknown IT EL “Until 2016 the date of issuance of the driving licence will be taken into account for checking the acquired rights of the concerned drivers”

8 Article 10: Community Code (c) IRU Academy 2012 Community Code Source: EC DG Transport

9 The project partnership recognise the indispensability of high quality training for developing an efficient, properly skilled, safe and sustainable workforce in commercial road transport. The purpose of this project is therefore to correctly identify the most important challenges and the most efficacious solutions for improving the provision of training to drivers and workers performing certain non mobile, logistics related tasks.   A detailed study on the implementation impact and challenges of Directive 2003/59/EC (driver training pillar) (c) IRU Academy 2012 STARTS: Skills, Training and the Road Transport Sector http://starts.iru.org/en_about

10 (c) IRU Academy 2012 STARTS: Skills, Training and the Road Transport Sector

11 (c) IRU Academy 2012 IRU Academy/CIECA – Survey on CPC Driver Implementation

12 Recognition “The very varied degrees of the quality of training and training curricula are still a major obstacle to mutual recognition” Problems of mutual recognition for initial qualification in Denmark, Denmark, Hungary, Hungary, Lithuania Lithuania Sweden Sweden “Mutual recognition of the periodic training seems to be a more ticklish issue, above all when the training is not fully completed“ (c) IRU Academy 2012

13 Evidence of (partial) periodic training carried out in other member state Main reasons are: lack of checking validity, comparing subject modules, etc… (c) IRU Academy 2012 Accepted, but evidence will be checkedNot accepted AustriaBelgium (partial) CroatiaCzech Republic CyprusFinland EstoniaFrance GermanyHungary Great Britain and Northern IrelandLatvia IrelandPoland MaltaSweden The Netherlands Norway Slovenia Switzerland

14 (c) IRU Academy 2012 Training capabilities “Member States which already had training facilities seem to have fewer problems to implement the Directive and the training operators could more easily deliver the training in compliance with the requirements of the Directive. In the Member States which had not had any type of training in the past, it must set it up from scratch and some are confronted with financial and time-related problems.”

15 In-house training 15 AllowedNot allowed Austria Belgium  Bulgaria  Czech Republic  Cyprus  Denmark  Estonia  Finland  France  Germany  Hungary  Italy  Lithuania  Luxembourg  Netherlands  Portugal  Romania  Slovak Republic Slovenia Spain  Sweden  United Kingdom  Allowed Not allowed

16 (c) IRU Academy 2012 Training capabilities & qualification   Training Capabilities “Despite a general increase in training capabilities, the provision of training remains inadequate in some Member States and driving schools were called upon to bring a solution to this problem.”   Instructor qualification “Becoming a trainer for initial qualification and/or periodic training is dependent on several conditions that differ from one State to another, with criteria such as age or experience which come into play in some States, but also such as a prior initial training.”

17 17 Requirements to become a periodic training instructor BASED ON DRIVING EXPERIENCE BASED ON DRIVING EXPERIENCE  The Netherlands Experience as professional driver or qualification comparable to driving instructor (WRM certificate);  Austria Experience as lecturers in the apprenticeship “professional driver” Driving school instructors for C and D licenses; Sufficient knowledge of regulations Education or equal practical experience.  Sweden Two years experience in transport sector, vocational teacher or proven experience.

18 (c) IRU Academy 2012 Training Programmes “Respondents have reported failures in the training programs of their member states”. In some occurrences this was due to a poor quality trainer profile.” “Therefore, the principle of the Directive 2003/59, which aims at driver professionalisation by adopting a better driving behaviour acquired during training sessions, such as safe and economically driving courses, is misguided since periodic training is used only as a business opportunity for training operators. “

19 (c) IRU Academy 2012 Training or right to drive?   Training Centres “Too often for most of the training organisations the aim of periodic training is not transmitting or promoting skill acquisition, but delivering a certificate which will allow trainees to continue exercising, the content and quality of training remain irrelevant.”

20 Initial Qualification Costs Training + Test Option The costs indicated refer to training / selling prices applied to candidates without funding. 20

21 (c) IRU Academy 2012 Training fees Initial Training - Cat. C ContributorPercentage Local and/or regional authorities8,3% Employment agencies16.70% The company16,7% The Driver58.30% Total100%

22 Periodic Training Costs 22 Periodic training average tariffs (without financing mechanisms) range from an average of 70 € in Romania to 1000 € in Luxemburg.

23 (c) IRU Academy 2012 Training fees Periodic Training - Cat. C ContributorPercentage Employment agencies7% The company and the driver7% The company50% The Driver36% Total100%

24 (c) IRU Academy 2012 Periodic training – who bears the cost? The driverBoth driver & employerEmployer Cyprus, Czech Republic, Latvia, Malta (env.), Northern Ireland, Belgium, Croatia, Estonia, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, Ireland, Lithuania, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Slovenia, Switzerland Finland: in 95% of the cases, Sweden, France

25 (c) IRU Academy 2012 Is training = working?   Qualifying as working hours This question can be answered in many different ways and represents the main issue negotiated within some Member States. This is often negotiated at company level. However some countries such as Finland and Great Britain, these training are considered as working hours, whilst in other not.

26 (c) IRU Academy 2012 More information? IRU Academy/CIECA Survey: http://www.iru.org/cmsfilesystemaction?file=Events_2010_DriverCompetence/CPC_Cieca.pdf STARTS’ project: http://starts.iru.org/en_home

27 (c) IRU Academy 2012 Professional Road Transport Training Industry Needs In order to answer to the training development challenges, the industry needs: Need for technical knowledge and teaching skills Need to ensure the use of best practice Need for quality training to impact on road safety and image of the profession Need to ensure knowledge transfer Need to encourage mobility opportunities Need to establish a pan European network of instructors

28 (c) IRU Academy 2012 Professional Road Transport Training Industry Needs Benefits Help countries raise the professional level of both instructors and drivers Provide harmonised professional driver training Provide relevant tools enabling to perform CPC Driver training Aim for EU recognition of CPC Driver instructor qualifications Speak with one voice in road transport training delivery Save money

29 (c) IRU Academy 2012


Download ppt "CPC Driver in the EU: Implementation Status Directive 2003/59 on the initial qualification and periodic training of drivers of certain road vehicles for."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google