Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / Using Complex Networks for Mobility Modeling and Opportunistic Networking: Part.

Published byElfrieda Gray Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / Using Complex Networks for Mobility Modeling and Opportunistic Networking: Part."— Presentation transcript:

1 Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropoul@eurecom.fr Using Complex Networks for Mobility Modeling and Opportunistic Networking: Part II Thrasyvoulos (Akis) Spyropoulos EURECOM

2 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis  Motivation  Introduction to Mobility Modeling  Complex Network Analysis for Opportunistic Routing  Complex Network Properties of Human Mobility  Mobility Modeling using Complex Networks  Performance Analysis for Opportunistic Networks 2

3 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis  Different origins: AP associations, Bluetooth scans and self- reported  Gowalla dataset  ~ 440’000 users  ~ 16.7 Mio check-ins to ~ 1.6 Mio spots  473 “power users” who check-in 5/7 days 3

4 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis  Small numbers (in parentheses) are for random graph  Clustering is high and paths are short! 4

5 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis  Louvain community detection algorithm  All datasets are strongly modular!  clear community structure exists 5

6 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis 6

7 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis 7

8 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis 8

9 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis  Motivation  Introduction to Mobility Modeling  Complex Network Analysis for Opportunistic Routing  Complex Network Properties of Human Mobility  Mobility Modeling using Complex Networks  Performance Analysis for Opportunistic Networks 9

10 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis Q: Do existing models create such (social) macroscopic structure? A: Not really Q: How can we create/modify models to capture correctly? A: The next part of the lesson 10

11 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis  Multiple Communities (house, office, library, cafeteria)  Time-dependency House (C 1 ) Community (e.g. house, campus) p 11 (i) p 12 (i) Rest of the network p 21 (i) Office C 2 Library C 3 p 23 (i) p 32 (i) 11

12 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis  Graph model: Vertices = humans, Weighted Edges = strength of interaction 12

13 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis  Local trips: inside community  Roaming/Remote trips: towards another community  TVCM (left): local and roaming trips based on simple 2- state Markov Chain.  HCMM (right): roaming trips (direction and frequency) dependent on where your “friends” are 13

14 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis  Assume a grid with different locations of interest  Geographic consideration might gives us the candidate locations 14

15 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis  p c (i) = attraction of node i to community/location c p 2 (B) (t) p 1 (B) (t) p 3 (B) (t) 15

16 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis  Motivation  Introduction to Mobility Modeling  Complex Network Analysis for Opportunistic Routing  Complex Network Properties of Human Mobility  Mobility Modeling using Complex Networks  Performance Analysis for Opportunistic Networks 16

17 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis Assumption 1) Underlay Graph  Fully meshed Assumption 2) Contact Process  Poisson(λ ij ), Indep. Assumption 3) Contact Rate  λ ij = λ (homogeneous) Analysis of Epidemics: The Usual Approach 17

18 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis 2-hop infection 18

19 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis A Poisson Graph A Real Contact Graph (ETH Wireless LAN trace) 19

20 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis 20

21 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis Bounding the Transition Delay  What are we really saying here??  Let a = 3  how can split the graph into a subgraph of 3 and a subgraph of N-3 node, by removing a set of edges whose weight sum is minimum? 21

22 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis A 2 nd Bound on Epidemic Delay  Φ is a fundamental property of a graph  Related to graph spectrum, community structure 22

23 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis  Distributed Estimation  Central problem in many (most?) DTN problems  Routing [Spyropoulos et al. ‘05] : estimate total number of nodes  Buffer Management [Balasubramanian et al. ‘07] : estimate number of replicas of a message  General Framework [Guerrieri et al. ‘09]: study of pair-wise and population methods for aggregate parameters  Distributed Optimization  Most DTN algorithms are heuristics; no proof of convergence or optimality  Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC): sequence of local (randomized) actions converging (in probability) to global optimal  Successfully applied to frequency selection [Infocom’07] and content placement [Infocom’10] 23

24 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis  Analytical Framework: S. Boyd, A. Ghosh, B. Prabhakar, D. Shah, “Randomized Gossip Algorithms”, Trans. on Inform. Theory, 2006.  Gossip algorithm to calculate aggregate parameters  average, cardinality, min, max  connected network (P2P, sensor net, online social net)  Initial node values [5, 4, 10, 1, 2] Connectivity Matrix 000.1500.12 000.20.180.2 0.150.2000.15 00.18000 0.120.20.1500 10101 01111 11101 01010 11101 node i node j Probability Matrix P: p ij Prob. (i,j) “gossip” in the next slot [5, 3, 10, 1, 3] avg 24

25 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis  In our network, p ij depends on mobility (next contact)  Weighted contact graph W = {w ij } =>  Main Result: slowest convergence 25

26 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis  Human Mobility is driven by Social Networking factors  Mobility Models can be improved by taking social networking properties into account  Better protocols can be designed by considering the position/role of nodes on the underlying social/contact graph  Mobility datasets, seen as complex networks, also exhibit the standard complex network properties: small world path, high clustering coefficient, skewed degree distribution 26

27 Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropoul@eurecom.fr Backup Slides 27

28 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis  Nodes are divided into groups  Each group has a leader  The leader’s mobility follows random way point  The members of the group follow the leader’s mobility closely, with some deviation  Examples:  Group tours, conferences, museum visits  Emergency crews, rescue teams  Military divisions/platoons 28

29 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis 29

30 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis Mobility Model ?? Synthetic Trace Contact Graph Contact Trace Contact Graph Community Structure? Modularity? Community Connections? Bridges? Structural Properties? ✔ 30

31 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis  Distribution of community connection among links and nodes  Implications for networking! (Routing, Energy, Resilience)  Which mobility processes create these? Bridging node u of community X: Strong links to many nodes of Y. Bridging link between u of X and v of Y: Strong link but neither u nor v is bridging node. 31

32 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis  Example 2/5 3/5 TRACES MODELS Low spread (Bridging Links) High spread (Bridging Nodes) 3/5 Why?? 32

33 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis  Difference in mobility processes (intuition)  Mobility Models: Nodes visit other communities  Reality/Traces: Nodes of different communities meet outside the context and location of their communities Outside Home Locations “At home” ✔ Community home loc.: Smallest set of locations which contain 90% of intra-community contacts 33

34 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis  Do nodes visit the same “social” location synchronously?  Do only pairs visit social locations or larger cliques?  Detecting cliques of synchronized nodes Geometric Distribution Measured overlap of time spent at social locations by two nodes Random, independent visits VS Result: many synchronized visits 34

35 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis  Hypergraph G(N, E)  Arbitrary number of nodes per Hyperedge  Represent group behavior  Calibration from measurements  # Nodes per edge  # Edges per node  Adapted configuration model  Drive different mobility models  TVCM:SO  HCMM:SO 35

36 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis 36

37 Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / spyropou@eurecom.fr Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis  Edge spread  Original propreties Small Spread MODELSTRACES ✔ ✔ 37

Download ppt "Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / Using Complex Networks for Mobility Modeling and Opportunistic Networking: Part."

Similar presentations

Mobile Communication Networks Vahid Mirjalili Department of Mechanical Engineering Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology.

Mobile Communication Networks Vahid Mirjalili Department of Mechanical Engineering Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology.
The Strength of Weak Ties

The Strength of Weak Ties
Analysis and Modeling of Social Networks Foudalis Ilias.

Analysis and Modeling of Social Networks Foudalis Ilias.
Exact Inference in Bayes Nets

Exact Inference in Bayes Nets
School of Information University of Michigan Network resilience Lecture 20.

School of Information University of Michigan Network resilience Lecture 20.
Construction of Simple Graphs with a Target Joint Degree Matrix and Beyond Minas Gjoka, Balint Tillman, Athina Markopoulou University of California, Irvine.

Construction of Simple Graphs with a Target Joint Degree Matrix and Beyond Minas Gjoka, Balint Tillman, Athina Markopoulou University of California, Irvine.
Structural Inference of Hierarchies in Networks BY Yu Shuzhi 27, Mar 2014.

Structural Inference of Hierarchies in Networks BY Yu Shuzhi 27, Mar 2014.
Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / Random Graph Models: Create/Explain Complex Network Properties.

Eurecom, Sophia-Antipolis Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos / Random Graph Models: Create/Explain Complex Network Properties.
1 Walking on a Graph with a Magnifying Glass Stratified Sampling via Weighted Random Walks Maciej Kurant Minas Gjoka, Carter T. Butts, Athina Markopoulou.

1 Walking on a Graph with a Magnifying Glass Stratified Sampling via Weighted Random Walks Maciej Kurant Minas Gjoka, Carter T. Butts, Athina Markopoulou.
Random Walk on Graph t=0 Random Walk Start from a given node at time 0

Random Walk on Graph t=0 Random Walk Start from a given node at time 0
CPSC 689: Discrete Algorithms for Mobile and Wireless Systems Spring 2009 Prof. Jennifer Welch.

CPSC 689: Discrete Algorithms for Mobile and Wireless Systems Spring 2009 Prof. Jennifer Welch.
1 Internet Networking Spring 2006 Tutorial 6 Network Cost of Minimum Spanning Tree.

1 Internet Networking Spring 2006 Tutorial 6 Network Cost of Minimum Spanning Tree.
1 University of Freiburg Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Theory of Interferences, Trade-Offs between.

1 University of Freiburg Computer Networks and Telematics Prof. Christian Schindelhauer Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Theory of Interferences, Trade-Offs between.
Cross Layer Adaptive Control for Wireless Mesh Networks (and a theory of instantaneous capacity regions) Michael J. Neely, Rahul Urgaonkar University of.

Cross Layer Adaptive Control for Wireless Mesh Networks (and a theory of instantaneous capacity regions) Michael J. Neely, Rahul Urgaonkar University of.
Advanced Topics in Data Mining Special focus: Social Networks.

Advanced Topics in Data Mining Special focus: Social Networks.
1 Internet Networking Spring 2004 Tutorial 6 Network Cost of Minimum Spanning Tree.

1 Internet Networking Spring 2004 Tutorial 6 Network Cost of Minimum Spanning Tree.
Graphs and Topology Yao Zhao. Background of Graph A graph is a pair G =(V,E) –Undirected graph and directed graph –Weighted graph and unweighted graph.

Graphs and Topology Yao Zhao. Background of Graph A graph is a pair G =(V,E) –Undirected graph and directed graph –Weighted graph and unweighted graph.
Network analysis and applications Sushmita Roy BMI/CS 576 Dec 2 nd, 2014.

Network analysis and applications Sushmita Roy BMI/CS 576 Dec 2 nd, 2014.
Cs/ee 143 Communication Networks Chapter 3 Ethernet Text: Walrand & Parakh, 2010 Steven Low CMS, EE, Caltech.

Cs/ee 143 Communication Networks Chapter 3 Ethernet Text: Walrand & Parakh, 2010 Steven Low CMS, EE, Caltech.
Wei Gao Joint work with Qinghua Li, Bo Zhao and Guohong Cao Department of Computer Science and Engineering The Pennsylvania State University Multicasting.

Wei Gao Joint work with Qinghua Li, Bo Zhao and Guohong Cao Department of Computer Science and Engineering The Pennsylvania State University Multicasting.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google