1. IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey 2009 Based on responses from the APNIC community APNIC29, 4 March 2010 By Miwa Fujii, Senior IPv6 Program Specialist, APNIC

2. Overview Background of IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey Data Findings and Analysis Future plan

3. First of all… Thank you so much for your participation in this survey during Sept 2009 –Survey period = 15/09/2009 – 02/10/2009 –Valid APNIC region responses = 429 –From 37 economies in the APNIC region

4. What is this survey? RIPE NCC designed this survey in collaboration with TNO and GNKS Consult –Sponsored by European Commission (EC) –Inspired by the work conducted by ARIN and CAIDA in 2008 in the ARIN region APNIC joined this survey –Keen to identify current IPv6 deployment status through empirical data Survey period: –15/09/2009 – 02/10/2009

5. Background of the survey Original intention of this survey –Inform EC what could be done to ensure a smooth transition to IPv6 Help EC understand the scope of the problem Identify the bottlenecks Propose useful ideas to support the transition APNIC agrees about the above principles –APNIC will circulate the outcomes from relevant organisations

6. Objectives of the survey To present the comprehensive view of present IPv6 penetration and projections of IPv6 deployment To share the empirical data with wider Internet multi stakeholders in the AP region –To help them to understand current IPv6 deployment status –To help them to clarify issues The first step to find constructive solutions

7. Data

8. Overview of responses 429 respondents from 37 economies in the AP region 76% of respondents have an APNIC account 74% of respondents works for profit organizations

9. Economies responded n=429

10. Respondent categories n=429

11. Size of your organisations n=429

12. Size of customer base (ISPs only) SizeNumber of respondents (n=218) Percentage Up to 1,0006128% 1,001 to 10,0004621% 100,001 to 100,0005525% 100,001 to 500,0002511% 500,001 to 1,000,00094% More than 1,000,0002210%

13. Usage of IPv6 connectivity (ISPs only) What percentage of your customer base using IPv6 connectivity? Customer base (%)Number of respondents (n=210) Percentage 0%12961% 0% - 0.5%5727% 0.5% - 1.0%168% 1.0% - 2.0%52% More31%

14. IPv6 Promotion (ISPs only) n=214

15. IPv6 address allocations and assignments Does your organization have, or consider having an IPv6 allocation and/or assignment? n=429

16. Does your organization have, or consider having an IPv6 allocation and/or assignment? IPv6 address allocations and assignments (only ISPs) n=192

17. No IPv6 yet (28% of 429): Why not? n=118

18. No IPv6 yet (28% of 429): Biggest hurdles? n=118 What do you expect to be the biggest hurdles for your organisation if you were to deploy IPv6?

19. Have IPv6 (72% of 429): n=311

20. Have IPv6 (72% of 429): Biggest hurdles? n=311 What are likely to be the biggest hurdles when deploying IPv6?

21. Have IPv6 (72% of 429): Problems in production? n=311 What are the biggest problems with IPv6 in production?

22. Finding 3 n=311 n=118 Assumption vs. reality: Biggest hurdles when deploying IPv6

23. Have IPv6 (72%): Do you have IPv6 presence? n=311

24. Have IPv6 (72%): What IPv6 setup do you use? N=289

25. Have IPv6 (72%): IPv6 production services n=234

26. Have IPv6 (72%): Amount of IPv6 traffic n=201

27. Planning IPv6 deployment

28. Findings and analysis

29. Finding 1 ISPs in the APNIC region: –Consider promoting IPv6 uptake to their customers Yes 52% + Maybe 35% = 87% –Have or consider having an IPv6 allocation and/or assignment Yes71% No29%

30. APNIC IPv6 Readiness Survey Conducted in Dec 2008 Deployed or ready for immediate deployment? Formal plan for future deployment? Budgeted for future deployment? 30

31. Analysis 1 Majority respondents from ISPs in the APNIC region positively consider promoting IPv6 to their customers –Good news! 71% respondents from ISPs in the APNIC region have or are considering getting IPv6 addresses –Good news! –IPv6 Kickstart policy (implemented in Feb 2010) will help such momentum

32. Need IPv6 addresses? IPv6 Kickstart policy

33. Finding 2 Why don’t 29% of the total respondents (429) consider having an IPv6 allocation/assignment? Don’t see business need = 58% Communication Service Providers doesn’t support IPv6 = 42% ISPs doesn’t support IPv6 = 19% 62% of the organistaions already have or are considering an IPv6 allocation and/or assignment because: They want to be ahead of the game

34. Analysis 2 IPv6 is a business continuity issue –Need to reframe your thinking on “don’t see business need” –IPv6 is a reality –Don’t be left behind! To ISPs: if your customers think so, you need to provide more information to educate them Service providers, system integrators, and hosting centers –Customers can choose a service provider –Don’t be left behind!

35. Finding 3 n=311 n=118 Assumption vs. reality What are likely to be the biggest hurdles when deploying IPv6?

36. Analysis 3 Attention to gaps: –Deploying IPv6 will be costly? “Cost” is relative to organisations so we need to be careful to reach a simple conclusion However worth to conduct serious cost benefit analysis now –You may find “An attempt is sometimes easier than expected” –Lack of vendor support Need to raise your voice to vendors now! –Information security Need to implement IPv6 in planed manner, not like a last minute dirty job –“An attempt is sometimes more difficult than expected”

37. Finding 4 What are the biggest problems with IPv6 in production? –Lack of user demand = 50% –Technical problems = 38% –No experience yet = 36%

38. Analysis 4 Lack of user demand could be due to: –Lack of understanding about necessity to adopt IPv6 by your customers Enterprises’ IT cycle – it may take one to two years to implement They need to start planning now! Educating your customer is the key Technical problems + No experience yet –“An attempt is sometimes more difficult than expected” –Plan and test!

39. Finding 5 Your organisation’s IPv6 setup Nature of your organisation’s IPv6 production services

40. Analysis 5 Obviously, dual-stack is the most adopted methods = 81% Native IPv6 = 49% –Good news! Tunneled IPv6 (excluding automatic tunneling) = 31% –Consideration points Capsulation overhead may have negative impact to IPv6 throughput IPv6 traffic may depend on reliability of IPv4 connection

41. Finding 6 Amount of IPv6 traffic –IPv6 traffic is insignificant = 77% –IPv6 traffic is non-negligible but less than IPv4 traffic = 17% –IPv6 traffic is same as IPv4 traffic = 3% –IPv6 traffic is greater than IPv4 traffic = 3%

42. Analysis 6 IPv6 traffic is emerging –About 20% of respondents see some level of IPv6 traffic –Encouraging news! Traffic comes from edges –Google turned on IPv6 support for YouTube –Sending a spike of IPv6 traffic Need to encourage content providers to adopt IPv6

43. Finally… 95% indicated their willingness to respond again in 2010 –Sometime around June We would like to seek your cooperation to measure IPv6 implementation in this region! Thank you!