Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

HITECH An ONC Perspective

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "HITECH An ONC Perspective"— Presentation transcript:

1 HITECH An ONC Perspective
Craig Brammer Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) June 18, 2010

2 Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC)
Resource for the entire U.S. health system Supports and coordinates efforts to improve health care through: Adoption of health information technology (HIT) Nationwide health information exchange (HIE) Created in 2004, then mandated in 2009 in the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act

3 HITECH Vision A major transformation in American health care
A major transformation in American health care Each patient receives optimal care through nationwide health information exchange Programs and regulations to help you overcome obstacles to adoption and Meaningful Use of electronic health records (EHRs)

4 Nationwide Health Information Exchange: Benefits
Private, secure, and comprehensive EHRs mean more informed clinical decision-making Better clinician-patient communication Efficient and convenient delivery of care Early diagnosis of disease, with potential to improve health outcomes and reduce costs Improved patient safety Efficiencies for administrative tasks

5 Challenge: EHR Adoption Levels

6 Challenge: EHR Adoption Levels
Hospital adoption levels: 1.5% percent of U.S. hospitals have a comprehensive electronic records system An additional 7.6% have a basic system Only 17% of hospitals have implemented computerized provider-order entry for medications Source: Jha A, DesRoches C, Campbell E, Donelan K, Rao S, Ferris T, Shields A, Rosenbaum S, Blumenthal D. “Use of Electronic Health Records in U.S. Hospitals”. New England Journal of Medicine: 360;16. April 16, 2009.

7 Barriers to EHR Adoption
Percent of Physicians Reporting a “Major Barrier” Source: DesRoches CM et al. Electronic health records in ambulatory care—a national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med. 359(1):50-60, 2008 Jul 3.

8 Federal Government Responds: HITECH Act
Part of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) Goal: Every American to have an EHR by 2014 Systematically addresses major barriers to adoption and Meaningful Use: Money/market reform Technical assistance, support, and better information Health information exchange Privacy and security

9 Privacy and Security: The HITECH Response
Bans sale of health information Requires ongoing audit trail Strengthens civil and criminal enforcement of HIPAA Expands patient rights to access their information Requires innovative encryption technology to prevent breaches Requires HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) to provide consumer education about protected health information

10 HITECH Regulations and Programs
Standards and Certification Criteria Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs (including Meaningful Use) Regional Extension Centers (RECs) State Health Information Exchange (HIE) Workforce Training Programs Beacon Communities Strategic Health Information Technology Advanced Research Projects (SHARP) Nationwide Health Information Network (NHIN)

11 How HITECH Addresses Barriers to Adoption
Obstacle Intervention Funds Allocated Market Failure, Need for Financial Resources Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs for “Meaningful Use” $27.3 B* Addressing Adoption Difficulties Regional Extension Centers Health IT Research/Resource Center $643 M $50 M Workforce Training Workforce Training Programs $84 M Addressing Technology Challenges and Providing Breakthrough Examples Strategic Health Information Technology Advanced Research Projects Beacon Communities Programs $60 M $250 M Privacy and Security Policy Framework New Privacy and Security Policies Addressed across all Programs Need for Platform for Health Information Exchange NHIN, Standards and Certification State Cooperative Agreement Program $64.3 M $548 M *$27.3 B is high scenario

12 Regional Extension Centers
HITECH: How the Pieces Fit Together Regional Extension Centers Workforce Training ADOPTION Improved Individual & Population Health Outcomes Increased Transparency & Efficiency Improved Ability to Study & Improve Care Delivery Medicare and Medicaid Incentives and Penalties MEANINGFUL USE EXCHANGE State Grants for Health Information Exchange Standards & Certification Framework Privacy & Security Framework Health IT Practice Research 12

13 Standards and Certification Criteria
Develop interoperability specifications that: Identify harmonized standards Provide detailed technical specifications for how those standards need to be used Work with health care organizations and standards-development organizations to ensure that standards are available for use nationally

14 EHR Incentive Programs and Meaningful Use
Criteria for Medicare- and Medicaid-eligible professionals and hospitals to receive incentives for using certified EHR technology in a meaningful manner The Recovery Act specifies the following 3 components of Meaningful Use: Use of certified EHR in a meaningful manner (e.g., e-prescribing) Use of certified EHR technology for electronic exchange of health information to improve quality of care Use of certified EHR technology to submit clinical quality and other measures

15 Meaningful Use: Health Outcome Policy Priorities
Improving quality, safety, efficiency, and reducing health disparities Engage patients and families in their health care Improve care coordination Improve population and public health Ensure adequate privacy and security protections for personal health information

16 Regional Extension Centers (RECs)
Goal: Assist at least 100,000 providers in achieving Meaningful Use by 2012 Establish RECs nationwide to support providers in adopting and becoming Meaningful Users of HIT through comprehensive, “on-the-ground” services: Outreach and education EHR vendor selection support Project management assistance Workflow redesign support Help with achieving Meaningful Use

17 RECs Focus on supporting primary care providers that are least likely to achieve Meaningful Use on their own: Small practices with less then 10 providers Public and critical access hospitals Community health centers and rural health clinics

18 Current RECs

19 REC Map Legend ID Organization Cohort ID Organization Cohort 1
Hawaii Health Information Exchange 2 Northern California Regional Extension Center 3 Southern California Regional Extension Center 4 Local Initiative Health Authority for Los Angeles County 5 Arizona Health-eConnection 6 Lovelace Clinic 7 Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center 8 The TAMUS Health Science Center Research Foundation 9 Univ. of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston 10 eQHealth Solutions, Inc. 11 Louisiana Health Care Quality Forum 12 Community Health Centers Alliance, Inc 13 University of South Florida-- USF Health 14 Health Choice Network, Inc. 15 UCF College of Medicine 16 South Carolina Research Foundation 17 VHQC and the Center for Innovative Technology, for The Virginia Consortium 18 National Indian Health Board 19 District of Columbia Primary Care Association (DCPCA) 20 Quality Insights of Delaware 21 NJ Institute of Technology 22 Fund for Public Health NY 23 New York eHealth Collaborative (NYeC) 24 eHealth Connecticut Inc. 25 Rhode Island Quality Institute 26 Massachusetts Technology Collaborative 27 HealthInfoNet 28 Vermont Information Technology Leaders ID Organization Cohort 29 North Carolina Area Health Education Centers Program 1 30 Quality Insights of Pennsylvania (Eastern) 2 31 Quality Insights of Pennsylvania (Western) 32 Chesapeake Regional Information For Our Patients 33 West Virginia Health Improvement Institute, Inc. 34 National Center for Primary Care, Morehouse School of Medicine 35 University of South Alabama Center for Strategic Health Innovation 36 Dallas- Fort Worth Hospital Council Education and Research Foundation 37 Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality 38 Arkansas Foundation For Medical Care 39 Qsource (TN) 40 University of Kentucky/UK HealthCare 41 Greater Cincinnati HealthBridge 42 Ohio Health Information Partnership (OHIP) 43 Altarum Institute 44 Purdue University 45 Northwestern University 46 Northern Illinois University 47 MetaStar, Inc. 48 The Curators of the University of Missouri 49 Kansas Foundation for Medical Care, Inc. 50 CIMRO of Nebraska 51 Iowa IFMC 52 Key Health Alliance (Stratis Health) 53 South Dakota HIT Regional Extension Center 54 Colorado RHIO 55 HealthInsight 56 Mountain-Pacific Quality Health Foundation 57 OCHIN, Inc. 58 Qualis Health 59 Alaska eHealth Network

20 Helps people who get providers to meaningful use
The HITRC Helps people who get providers to meaningful use Mission Accelerate the adoption and meaningful use of EHRs The HITRC Convenes Regional Extension Centers and Provides tools and expertise toward collaboration in accelerating adoption and meaningful use of health information technology that is used to improve the quality of patient care. Vision When HITRC successfully realizes it mission, there will be at least 100,000 priority primary care physicians meaningfully using EHRs by 2012; all by 2014 Goals Full (100%) participation in the Knowledge Sharing Network The leading source of easily accessible health IT implementation information Steady increase in level of EHR implementation capabilities and expertise Objectives Convene Regional Extension Centers Provide Technical Assistance Deliver usable tools and artifacts (“stuff”)

21 State Health Information Exchange
Goal: Give every provider options for meeting health information exchange (HIE) Meaningful Use requirements 4-year program to support state programs to ensure the development of HIE within and across their jurisdictions 56 states and territories awarded funding for HIE planning and implementation States need an ONC-approved State Plan before federal funding can be used for implementation Exchange must meet national standards

22 Workforce Training Programs
Goal: Help train up to 50,000 new HIT workers to assist providers in becoming Meaningful Users of EHRs Four distinct programs that aim to support the education of new HIT professionals, including: Community college consortia Curriculum development centers University-based training Competency examination program

23 Workforce Training Programs
Community College Consortia Five regional multi-institution consortia, creating non-degree training programs that can be completed in six months or less. Curriculum Development Centers Five awards to develop educational materials for key HIT topics to be used by Community College Consortia program. University-Based Training Programs Nine awards supporting existing programs to produce trained HIT professionals (most courses of study completed in ≤12 months). Competency Examination Program One award to create an objective assessment of basic competency for HIT individuals (non-degree programs and other members of workforce).

24 Work Force: Community College Consortia Program
Population and Target Grant Community Colleges by Region Region A B C D E Total Census Population 23,171,056 47,460,504 65,115,773 97,020,826 75,669,343 308,437,502 Percentage of National Population 8% 15% 21% 31% 25% 100% Minimum Students to be Trained Annually 750 1,650 2,250 3,300 2,550 10,500 Target Number of Member Community Colleges 5-8 11-14 13-18 16-22 17-23 70 Funding Allocation $6,200,000 $10,750,000 $14,650,000 $21,150,000 $17,250,000 $70,000,000

25 The Beacon Community Program
Goal: Share best practices that help communities achieve cost savings and health improvement 15 demonstration communities* that will: Build and strengthen their HIT infrastructure and exchange capabilities and showcase the Meaningful Use of EHRs Provide valuable lessons to guide other communities to achieve measurable improvement in the quality and efficiency of health services or public health outcomes *Two additional communities to be funded in Summer 2010

26 Patient-centered cognitive support
Strategic Health Information Technology Advanced Research Projects (SHARP) Funded research program to find breakthrough advances to overcome barriers to HIT adoption Projects focus on: Security Patient-centered cognitive support Health care application and network-platform architectures Secondary use of EHR data

27 The Nationwide Health Information Network (NHIN)
A set of policies, standards, and services that enable the secure exchange of health information over the Internet Defines nationally recognized standards for interoperability and promotes their use in EHRs through certification programs

28 NHIN Improves patient care by linking:
Health information exchanges Integrated delivery networks Pharmacies Government Labs Providers Payers Other stakeholders Not a large database of patient records or a physical network that runs on HHS servers

29 Visit the ONC Web site: healthit.hhs.gov
For More Information Visit the ONC Web site: healthit.hhs.gov


Download ppt "HITECH An ONC Perspective"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google