Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Colorado Thermal Energy Standard A Global View By Paul Bony Director of Western Region Market Development ClimateMaster June 28, 2012.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Colorado Thermal Energy Standard A Global View By Paul Bony Director of Western Region Market Development ClimateMaster June 28, 2012."— Presentation transcript:

1 Colorado Thermal Energy Standard A Global View By Paul Bony Director of Western Region Market Development ClimateMaster June 28, 2012

2 Public Policy & the Environment  Why do we have environmental regulations? –Local Air quality (Smog) –Regional Environmental Problems Acid rain –Global Environmental Problems Global warming, climate change, climate weirdness

3 Public Policy & the Environment  Why are electric utilities the primary target of efficiency and renewable energy regulations & policies? Public interest theory (regulated monopoly) State regulation is in the public interest as it makes consumers better off than unregulated commerce –“Focused” target – with “easy” oversight –Imbedded financing solution Rates

4 Public Policy & the Environment  Ending coal power as a climate change initiative? –Many utilities and the coal mining industry have long fought emissions rules regarding coal generation, They are not winning the fight. –Utilities are being forced by regulators to retrofit coal generators with new control equipment, or retire them. –Since January 2010, 112 coal plants totaling more than 42,800 megawatts have, or soon will be retired.  Carbon offsets from renewable thermal energy can provide an alternative (and lower cost) approach to meeting carbon reduction goals

5 Public Policy & the Environment  Renewable generation accounted for almost half of the estimated 208 gigawatts (GW) of electric capacity added globally during 2011. (Global Trends in Renewable Energy Investment 2012, United Nations Energy Project)  Renewables could supply 80% of total U.S. electricity generation by 2050, according to a new study by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

6 Is the Job Done?  There is a great opportunity to obtain cost effective carbon reductions from fossil fuel thermal end uses. –If the carbon emissions from burning fossil fuels to generate electricity are not acceptable, why should we allow the burning of fossil fuels to heat buildings and water when better, low carbon, technologies are available?

7 Buildings Dominate U.S. Energy Use and Carbon Emissions with Heating, Cooling, and Water Heating being the Largest Contributors Thermal Loads Heating 9.2% Cooling 4.3% Hot Water 3.8% Total 17.3% ~ 20% of all U.S. Carbon Emissions

8 Simple Concept  Water moves energy better than air does  Water in the ground provides renewable energy 8 Typical water-refrigerant Heat Exchanger used in most GSHP equipment

9 1 kWh to power the system 1 kWh to power the system 3-5 kWh of geothermal energy moved from the earth 4-6 kWh heat equivalent delivered Geothermal Heat Pumps 400-600% Efficient

10 Geothermal Heat Pumps Conventional HVAC Geothermal HVAC

11 14.6 In 9.5 Out

12 COPs of 6+ are possible with advanced equipment & design

13 Geothermal Heat Pumps  The difference in the before and after system efficiency = carbon emissions savings.  300,000 GSHP retrofits could equal the carbon emissions of a 500 mW coal plant (which serves 500,000 homes!)

14 Geothermal Heat Pumps  Geothermal heat pumps produce the lowest carbon dioxide emissions, including all source effects, of all available space- conditioning technologies (EPA, 1993).  A GeoExchange systems saves more CO2 than an equivalent investment in solar PV. –Based on DMEA’s electric energy carbon load and weather data.

15 Geothermal Heat Pumps are the Most Efficient way to Convert Green Energy into Heating, Cooling and Water Heating Making the most effective use of this precious resource No carbon electricity = carbon free heating, cooling & water heating

16 Geothermal For Utilities  Geothermal heat pumps offer utilities an excellent tool to: –Obtain significant peak load reduction –Improve load factor –Generate large carbon emission reductions –Meet efficiency, renewable energy and customer satisfaction goals –With out putting pressure on electric rates –In fact, they can make rates go down

17 Geothermal For Utilities Clipping the Peak

18 Air Source A/C Vs. Ground Source Efficiency Outdoor Temperature Energy Efficiency EER Ground Source – 14-15 EER Air Source – 10-11 EER Air Source – 9-10 EER Air Source 8-9 EER

19 Demand Impacts 4 ton Geo vs. Conventional –Home Peaks – Denver Colorado Avg. of 2.1kw savings

20 Peak Demand Impacts Source- Scientific American Denver CO eQuest whole house PV system electric output

21 Leveraging Federal Incentives  Fed tax credits cover 1/3 of the cost of a residential Geo installation.  Federal tax code (credit) covers 10% of commercial Geo installations, plus provides accelerated depreciation (5 years) plus efficient building tax credits ($1.50/sq. ft.) – covering over ½ the total installation cost (and all of the incremental cost). –Paybacks under 3 years! (some first year)

22 Net Residential Energy Impacts GHP Retrofit from N Gas  5,086 increase in kWh (base is 14,511 kWh) total kWh = 19,597  1,479 decrease in Therms of N Gas –147,900,000 Btu * 45% heat rate = 19,597 kWh generation possible with the gas saved –Typical thermal efficiency for combined cycle electrical generators is 56 – 60%.  Equals more (net) kWh generation than the home uses.

23 But Colorado Efficiency Policy  Penalizes Geo systems –Requires net decrease in kW demand (does not specify Summer Peak) –But also requires 5% decrease in kWh sales  Ignores the fact that GHPs cut expensive Summer peak demand and free up enough natural gas to generate home’s entire electric use for a year!

24 The UK Has it Right  Increasing renewable heat is key to the UK meeting its renewable energy targets, reducing carbon emissions, ensuring energy security and helping to build a low carbon economy.  They have a Renewable Heat Incentive, making renewable heat an environmentally sound decision, and financially attractive. This effort is targeted at driving the increased use of renewables, stimulating the renewables industry, encourage further innovation and ultimately, bring down the cost of renewable heating.

25 Maryland Has it Right  HB 1186  HB 1186 was signed into law on May 22, 2012, the day that Maryland became the first state in the country to make the energy generated by geothermal heating and Cooling (GHC) technologies eligible for the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) as a Tier 1 renewable source. HB 1186 HB 1186  Home owners will be eligible to receive Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) for GHC systems that are commissioned on or after January 1, 2013.

26 Maryland Has it Right

27 Wyandotte Municipal Services Has it Right  The Wyandotte, Michigan City Council approved the creation of a geothermal utility. The general manager of Wyandotte Municipal Services said there are many reasons to be excited about the introduction of geothermal energy, including its heating and cooling efficiency, its affordability, because geothermal helps Wyandotte Municipal Services improve the operation of the electric system and reduce power supply costs, and benefits to the environment. (August 2010)

28 New York City Has it Right  Use of renewable energy will help New York City reduce fossil fuel dependence, improve air quality, reduce adverse public health impacts from poor air quality and help diversify the suite of renewable energy sources used and conserve energy.  Geothermal technologies represent a major opportunity for reducing national energy use, greenhouse gases and pollution, while delivering comfort, reliability and significant fuel cost savings to building and homeowners.

29 New York City Has it Right  Therefore, the Council finds that it is in the best interests of the City to explore measures that would facilitate and increase the use of geothermal energy sources in New York City.

30 Zero Energy Building Proponents Have it Right  ZEBs as buildings that use no more energy over the course of the year than they produce from on-site renewable sources. –You can not produce natural gas, oil, or propane on site.  The efficiency levels needed for ZEBs are readily obtainable, with current technology and at reasonable incremental costs, for many common building types. (New Buildings Institute, March 2012)

31 Colorado Has an Excellent Opportunity to Get it Right! With Thermal Energy Standard Legislation Yes We Can!

32 Thank You For Your Attention! Questions? Paul Bony paulsbony@yahoo.com 970-249-8476 If you ever need a hand you can reach me at:

33 Elephants In the Room  Bias towards Natural Gas –Fuel Switching Why is converting electricity to gas & PV good, while switching gas to 500% efficient electricity powered by PV, wind & other renewables bad? –Shale Gas Is there really a 120 year supply at today’s prices? –Gas CO2 emissions Burning natural gas in furnaces and water heaters generates CO2 emissions, as does producing Natural Gas. Why does policy ignore this fact?

34 Elephants In the Room  PV bias –Even if every home had PV on the roof, where would heating energy come from? –Why ignore the benefit of combining efficiency, renewable thermal energy and PV electricity? Net Zero or Near Zero buildings

35 Elephants In the Room  Financial Barriers –PACE –On-Bill Financing/Collection –Utility Loop Ownership Recognize DSM (Peak reduction & off-peak sales) value  Capturing the Attention of Both the Public & Policy Makers  Breaking Through the Conventional HVAC Market Mind Set


Download ppt "Colorado Thermal Energy Standard A Global View By Paul Bony Director of Western Region Market Development ClimateMaster June 28, 2012."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google