1. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt1 2.4. Study on perspectives of main grid network interconnection between countries and with potential wind parks Perspectives of Offshore Wind Energy development in marine areas of Lithuania, Poland and Russia

2. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt2 The problem Lack of reliable knowledge concerning perspectives of off-shore wind power parks interconnection between countries and with potential wind parks are limiting forecasting and planning of investments into this kind of perspective renewable energy.

3. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt3 Main tasks 1.To overview the state and problems of interconnection of Polish, Lithuanian and Kaliningrad district (Russia) electricity power grids. 2.To analyse EU and national institutional frame work of power grids development. 3.To define and analyse different scenarios of interconnection of potential off-shore wind parks.

4. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt4 Preface In May 2004 the EU integrated eight countries from Central and Eastern Europe, as well as Malta and Cyprus, into what is about to become a truly pan-European Union. But whereas the political EU enlargement is proceeding smoothly, electricity enlargement turns out to be a more complex undertaking, which is far from being achieved at present. Since the mid-1990’s, the accession countries had worked hard to bring their energy sectors in conformity with the EU acquis communautaire.

5. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt5 The objective of EU electricity enlargement is to move towards a single, sustainable European electricity market: A single market refers to the expectation of a competitive market and the efficient allocation of generation and transmission resources, at least at a regional level, if not at the level of the new EU 25 at large. Sustainable refers to the ability of the electricity system to meet the environmental objectives of the EU, in particular with regard to the share of renewable in electricity production and the greenhouse gas targets, while assuring reliable electricity supply at reasonable costs. Establishing open competitive markets while at the same time pursuing environmental objectives is not necessarily a contradiction. A benchmarking approach of comparing different reform objectives can make cross-country comparisons possible.

6. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt6 When considering the electricity map of the region, one clearly distinguishes three sub-regions: The Central European Countries (CEC) are the former CENTREL- countries (Poland, Czech and Slovak Republics, Hungary) which are emerging as the core-zone in Eastern Europe; it’s considering Slovenia and Croatia also as being part of this region. These countries present by far the biggest market and assemble the strongest players of the region; South Eastern Europe (SEE) consists of the EU candidates Romania and Bulgaria as well as the other Balkan states (except Albania); The Baltic countries (Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia) are still part of the North-West Russian electricity system. The electricity sector in the Baltic countries is infinitesimally small, but it is politically highly sensitive (nuclear power in Ignalina/Lithuania, geopolitical issues with Russia, Kaliningrad, etc.).

7. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt7 European power market enlargement of European Union and integration into European and World economic structures requires significantly increase electricity market integration, which results in less than 10% of Europe’s electricity being traded across borders now

8. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt8 Trans-European networks priority projects for electricity

9. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt9 Priorities of EU Power Links Concerning Infrastructure the Priority Interconnection Plan sets out five priorities: –Identifying the most significant missing infrastructure up to 2013 and ensuring an-European political support to fill the gaps. –Appointing four European co-coordinators to pursue the four of the most important priority projects: the Power-Link between Germany, Poland and Lithuania; connections to offshore wind power in Northern Europe; electricity interconnections between France and Spain; and the Nabucco pipeline, bringing gas from the Caspian to central Europe. –Agreeing a maximum of 5 years within which planning and approval procedures must be completed for projects that are defined as being "of European interest" under Trans-European Energy Guidelines. –Examining the need to increase funding for the Energy Trans- European networks, particularly to facilitate the integration of renewable electricity into the grid. –Establishing a new Community mechanism and structure for Transmission System Operators (TSOs), responsible for co-coordinated network planning.

10. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt10 Baltic power grid on cross-road European Union: Invited Baltic States to become EU Members Forgot integrate power nets Reconnection strategies: Status quo “Go West” Integration

11. 27.1.2006Timo Toivonen11 DK2 DK1 SE FI 716 h 552 h 1252 h 440 h 3563 h 3888 h 2403 h 111 h 30 h 657 h 180 h 0 h SE NO1 NO2 FI 50 % 2 % 45 % 3 % 2 % 1 % 16 % 0 % 18 % 17 % 8 % 5 % 13 % Bottlenecks 2005 % of time

12. 27.1.200612 400 kV Transmission Capacity RUS - FIN

13. 27.1.2006Timo Toivonen13 Transmission Connection

14. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt14 Finland - Sweden 500MW 500 kV cable 270 km 300 M€ 2010 Market >40%

15. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt15 Baltic power grid reconnection strategies “Status quo” Krievij a Ukrain a Baltkrievi ja Polij a Čehij a Vācij a Lietuv a Latvij a Igaunij a Somij a Norvēģij a Dānij a Zviedrij a NORDEL UCTI/ CENTRAL Russia Ukraine Belorus Poland Czec h Germany Lithuani a Latvia Estonia Finland Norway Dānmark ja Sweden Integrated Baltic and CIS energy system NORDEL UCTE/ CENTRAL Europe ESTLINK 350 MW 11.2006 Lithuania - Sweden 1000 MW Lithuania – Poland 1000 MW

16. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt16 Connectivity of power markets Baltic Sates are technically strongly connected to Russian power market Baltic States have strong cross boarder interconnections Estonian network allows to import all power needed Baltic States have no connections to other EU countries

17. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt17 Estlink, 2006 Realised in end of 2006.: Estlink: Estonia – Finland (350MW). 99 (70 and 9+20) km. 110 M€.

18. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt18 Feasibility study: Alytus - Elk > 75 % from EU founds 154 km HV (400 kV) duble-circuit transferring grid from Alytus to Elk. project could be finalized in 2012- 2015 year. Costs - 237 mln. Euro: – 71 mln. euro in Poland and 166 mln. euro – on Lithuanian territory. Additional investments for enforcement of grids: 371 mln. Euro in Poland and 95 mln. Euro in Lithuania. Investors – both sides. Total - 607 mln. Euro Should be finalised Baltic ring: by joining energy systems of Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Poland.

19. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt19 Feasibility study: Klaipeda - Hemsjo 350 km, 700-1000 MW submarine HVDC 1000 kV cable. ~EUR 550 million. The study is to be completed by end of January, 2008.

20. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt20 Hiiumaa off-shore wind park (4energy)

21. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt21 Baltic power grid reconnection strategies “Go West” Separate links to Sweden from: Poland Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia Finland

22. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt22 Baltic power grid reconnection strategies “Integration” Investigate, model and design the most appropriate offshore grid - Bosegrid® - Baltic Offshore electricity grid

23. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt23 European Strategic Energy Technology Plan EC has two key objectives for energy technology: –to lower the cost of clean energy and –to put EU industry at the forefront of the rapidly growing low carbon technology sector. To meet these objectives, the Commission intends to put forward a first European Strategic Energy Technology Plan for endorsement by the 2008 Spring Council.

24. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt24 EC long-term vision By 2020, technologies will have to make the 20% renewable target a reality by permitting a sharp increase in the share of lower cost renewables (including the roll-out of off-shore wind …..

25. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt25 Pan European Super grid Capacity factor of OWP: Stand alone  40% Super grid  70% Power market integration: Now - 10% With Super grid  100%

26. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt26 Plot characteristics

27. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt27 Interconnection scenarios ScenariosDefinition 0 – no connectionwind power parks should be connected to national power grids Line connectionEastern Baltic arm of trans European Supergrid. This arm could connect off-shore wind parks starting from Finland trough Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Russia and Poland. Combined connectionTwo side connections of wind parks between countries

28. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt28 No interconnection

29. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt29 Line connection Onshore: Poland –Lithuania: 607 mln.euro. Offshore: Poland- Lithuania: 550 mln.Euro.

30. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt30 Combined connections

31. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt31 Conclusion 1 After accession of East European countries in EU still not formed efficient interconnection of power grids and electricity trade market. Only at end of 2006 construction of Estlink enabled to connect Baltic power grids to Scandinavian power market. Polish and Lithuanian inland interconnection of power grids provided to implement till 2015 year. Lithuanian and Swedish submarine interconnection possibilities are under investigation now and could be realised till 2015 year.

32. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt32 Conclusion 2 European Energy technological plan the first from four of the most important priority projects named the Power- Link between Germany, Poland and Lithuania. By 2020, technologies will have to make the 20% renewable target a reality by permitting a sharp increase in the share of lower cost renewables, including the roll- out of off-shore wind. Priorities of such a targeted initiative could include getting large scale offshore wind competitive within the short term and paving the way towards a competitive European offshore Supergrid.

33. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt33 Conclusion 3 Trans European Supergrid discovers abilities to become as revolutionary efficient looking from point of stability of power supply as able to reach capacity factor till 70% and significant reduce power reservation needs. This technical decision could open and connect energy markets of member States.

34. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt34 Conclusion 4 Comparing different scenarios of wind power parks interconnection, the most acceptable for Poland, Russia (Kaliningrad) and Lithuania is Line connection variant as Eastern Baltic arm of trans European Supergid. No interconnection and combined interconnection scenarios require too much legislative changes and indirect investments related to enforcement inland grids and capacity reservation. It’s also important that construction of Supergrid could avoid construction of inland connection between Lithuania and Poland, same as submarine interconnection Lithuania – Sweden.

35. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt35 Conclusion 5 Tools: Policy – EU strategic and financial support Organization – BOSEC establishing Environment – scientific support

36. 2007-12-10www.eksponente.lt36 Thank you for your attention!