Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

 In domestic transactions, the under invoicing of sales and over-invoicing of expenses ordinarily will be revenue neutral in nature except in two circumstances.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: " In domestic transactions, the under invoicing of sales and over-invoicing of expenses ordinarily will be revenue neutral in nature except in two circumstances."— Presentation transcript:

1

2  In domestic transactions, the under invoicing of sales and over-invoicing of expenses ordinarily will be revenue neutral in nature except in two circumstances having tax arbitrage such as where one of the related entities is ◦Loss making or ◦Liable to pay tax at lower rate and the profits are shifted to such entity

3  Transfer Pricing till A.Y. 2012-13 was applicable to Entities having International transactions with their Associated Enterprise  Honoring the Supreme Court ruling in case of CIT vs M/s Glaxo Smithkline Asia (P) Limited expanded the ambit of transfer pricing to Specified Domestic Transactions w.e.f. 1 st April,2013

4 Intent of Domestic TP-DTA & Tax Holiday Unit Particulars Co.A Co.B Taxed in India @ 0% 33% Income from RP 150 - Other Income 300 600 Expense to RP - Other Expenses 300 300 Profit / Loss 150 150 Tax - 50 Total Tax for the Group 50 150 Particulars Co.A Co.B Taxed in India @ 0% 33% Income from RP 225 - Other Income 300 600 Expense to RP - Other Expenses 300 300 Profit / Loss 225 75 Tax - 25 Total Tax for the Group Scenario 1Scenario 2 225 25 By shifting of expenses from a tax holiday unit (Power) to a unit in the Domestic Tariff Area, the group could reduce its tax liability by 25. To avoid such cases, Domestic TP has been introduced.

5 Intent of Domestic TP-Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) Particulars Co.A Co.B Taxed in India @ 33% 33% Income from RP 100 - Other Income 200 400 Expense to RP - Other Expenses 400 200 Profit / Loss (100) 100 Tax - 33 Total Tax for the Group 33 100 Particulars Co.A Co.B Taxed in India @ 33% 33% Income from RP 150 - Other Income 200 400 Expense to RP - Other Expenses 400 200 Profit / Loss (50) 50 Tax - 17 Total Tax for the Group Scenario 1Scenario 2 150 17 By shifting of expenses fro a loss making company to a profit making company, the group could reduce its tax liability by 16 for the current year, though the impact will be reversed in future years given carry forward of losses.

6 Intent of Indian Transfer Pricing (TP) Regulations Indian Co. Associated Enterprise (AE Co.) Overseas (Tax at Lower rates, say 10%) India (Tax @ 33%) Shifting of Losses Tax Savings for the group -> Indian Govt. loses

7  Applicability Transaction covered under SectionApplicability clause (b) of sub section (2) of Section 40 Any expenditure Sub section (6) of 80AComputing Section ( Determination of ALP) Sub section (8) of Section 80IA Profit based deduction Any transfer of goods or services within units – Intra Units Sub section (10) of Section 80IA Profit based deduction Any business transacted within closely connected entities Chapter VIA or Section 10AA Profit based deduction Any transaction In any of the sectionAny other transactions as may be prescribed

8  Threshold  Shift of focus  How would you interpret the close connection ?  Fair Market Value can established using basic market evidence  Determination of Arm’s Length Price  Advance Pricing Agreements NOT applicable to specified domestic transactions  Powers shifted

9 Scope – Domestic Transactions Tax holiday undertakings covering : inter-unit transfer of goods and services Expenditure incurred between related parties defined u/s 40A Any other transaction that may be specified Aggregate Applicable from Transaction value exceeds Rs. 50 millions in a financial year ( Applicable from FY 2012-13) Transactions with entities having close connection

10 10 SDT Inter unit transfer of goods & services by undertakings to which profit-linked deductions apply – Sub section (8) of Section 80IA Expenditure incurredbetween relatedparties defined under section 40A Transactions between undertakings, to which profit-linked deductions apply, having close connection Sub section (10) of Section 80IA Any other transaction that may be specified Scope of Section 92BA

11 SectionTax Payers coveredApplicability of TP provisions on SDT aggregating a value of more than INR50 million 40A(2)Substantial Interested Parties Expenses or payment made or to be made. 80A(6)Enterprise claiming profit linked deductions from total income under chapter VI-A Intra Transfer of goods and services and within the closed connected entities. ( i.e. eligible business to non eligible business) 80IA Sub Section (8) And (10)  Infrastructure developers  Telecommunications service providers  Developers of Industrial parks  Producers or distributors of power An enterprise with an eligible business and close connection with any other person The goods and services of an eligible business transferred to any other business carried on by the same taxpayer and vice- a-versa, are to meet the arm’s length test. (sub section 8) Intra Unit Transfer a business transacted between a taxpayer carrying on an eligible business transact with a close connection, which results in more than ordinary profits to the business, is to meet the arm’s length test. (sub section 10)

12 SectionTax Payers coveredApplicability of TP provisions on SDT aggregating a value of more than INR50 million 80-IABDevelopers of SEZs The goods and services of an eligible business transferred to any other business carried on by the same taxpayer and vice-a-versa, are to meet the arm’s length test. (sub section 8) Intra Unit Transfer a business transacted between a taxpayer carrying on an eligible business transact with a close connection, which results in more than ordinary profits to the business, is to meet the arm’s length test. (sub section 10)  Small Scale industry engaged in operating Cold storage plant  Industrial undertaking in industrially backward state as mentioned in VIII Schedule (ex : Jammu and Kashmir)  Multiplex theaters and convention centers  Company carrying on scientific research and development  Eligible housing projects  Eligible hospitals 80-IC / 80-IE Persons with units in specified states / north-eastern states claiming deduction 80-IDHotels located in districts with World Heritage sites 10AAPersons with income from SEZ units

13 13 Section 92BA Analysed...... SectionRelevance with provisions of Sec 92BA 92 : Computation of income having regard to ALP 92A : Meaning of AE  92B : Meaning of International transaction  92C : Methods of computation of ALP 92CA: Reference to TPO 92CB : Safe harbour rules  92CC : Advance Pricing agreement  92CD : Effect of TP agreement  92D : Maintenance of information and documents 92E : CA’s Report 92F : Definitions: Accountant, ALP, Enterprise, PE, Specified date, Transaction*  For the purpose of sec. 92, 92C, 92D and 92E * Sec 92F – Definitions does not define terms relevant for domestic TP transactions

14 4 Intra Unit Transactions Accountant’s Report Tax Holiday Assessment FMV to ALP 1 5 2 3 Expenses 6

15 Steps Identify the type of the transaction covered under SDT Classification of transaction covered under SDT (i.e.40A(2)(b), Intra Group goods and services, Within Closely connected entities) Compliance of Section 92D with Rule 10D. ( Maintenance of Documentation which includes Transfer Study report, MAM, PLI, Tested Party, Manner of determination of ALP) Legal Compliance before due date of Filing return of Income

16  To check evasion of tax through excessive or unreasonable payments to relatives and associate concerns and should not be applied in a manner which will cause hardship in bona fide cases.  AO is expected to exercise his judgment in a reasonable and fair manner

17  Fair market value of the goods, services or facilities for which the payment is made, or  The legitimate needs of the business or Profession  The benefit derived by or accruing to the assesse from the expenditure  The above view is expressed by Hon’ble Guj High Court in the case of Coronation Flour Mills vs. Asst. CIT [ 2009] 314 ITR 1

18  Expenditure paid or to be paid to related parties will require to be at arm’s length  Examples of related parties under section 40A(2)(b) PayerReceiver of Payment Individual Relative of individual Company Director of company or relative of the director AoP/ HUF Member of AoP / HUF or relative of such member Any taxpayer Payment to a person who has substantial interest Payment to a director / partner / member / relatives of a person who has substantial interest Payment to a company in which parent (more than 20% holding) has substantial interest Payment to a person whose director/ partner/ member has substantial interest Payment to a director/ partner/ member/ relatives of a person whose director/ partner/ member has substantial interest Payment to a person in which entities have substantial interest Payment to a person in which my director/ partner/ member/ relatives have substantial interest Payment to any of director/ partner/ member/ relatives Substantial Interest means beneficial ownership of shares with at least 20% voting right or beneficial entitlement of at least 20% of the profits

19  Section 2(41) defines relative in relation to an individual to mean: ◦Husband; ◦Wife; ◦Brother; ◦Sister; or ◦any lineal ascendant or descendant;

20  Means an enterprise – ◦(a). Which participates, directly or indirectly, or through one or more intermediaries, in the management or control or capital of the other enterprises; or ◦(b). In respect of which one or more persons who participate, directly or indirectly, or through one or more intermediaries, in its management or control or capital, are the same person who participate, directly or indirectly, or through one or more intermediaries, in the management or control or capital of the other enterprise.

21  Section 40A(2)(b) applies to payment made to the assesse’s relative or an associate concern is liable (Substantially Interested Parties)  Section 92A applies to transaction with AE directly or indirectly or through one or more intermediaries in the management or control or capital of the other enterprise.

22 22 B A C D E Transaction Covered A & B A & C A & D  A & E  B & C D & E  C & D  B & E 

23  Domestic Transfer Pricing usher shift from generic ‘Fair Market Value’ concept to Arm’s Length Pricing CharacteristicFair Market ValueArm’s Length Pricing Definition The price which goods or services would have fetched or cost in the open market A price which is applied in a transaction in uncontrolled conditions Computation Mechanism No specific mechanism provided in law Most appropriate method out of five prescribed methods Transaction Value Any market pricing point can be treated as fair market value Arithmetic mean of comparable prices treated as arm’s length price Sample Size One comparable may be sufficient to establish fair market value Require bigger sample size for establishing arm’s length Deviation No deviation permitted from fair market value Deviation of plus / minus three percent is permitted

24  “Arm’s length price” means a price which is applied or proposed to be applied in a transaction in uncontrolled conditions  Arm’s Length price is determined using the Most Appropriate Method :  If more than one comparable price is obtained using above methods, then the arm’s length price would be ‘Arithmetic Mean’ of comparable prices ◦Deviation of plus / minus five percent is permitted from arm’s length price MethodsComparability Comparable Uncontrolled Price Method‘Price’ of the transactions Resale Price Method ‘Gross margin’ of company reselling products / services to unrelated parties Cost Plus Method ‘Gross margin’ of company selling manufactured products / services to related parties Profit Split Method ‘Splits profits’ between parties to transactions based on economic parameters Transactional Net Margin Method ‘Net Profit margin’ (Operating Profit) of ‘Tested Party’

25 Methods for Determination of ALP Price applied in a transaction between independent enterprises in uncontrolled conditions To be determined by applying the Most Appropriate Method, being one of the following five methods Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) Method Resale Price Method (RPM) Cost Plus Method (CPM) Profit Split Method (PSM) Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) In case, more than one price is determined by MAM: Apply Arithmetic mean Range of + 5% of the arithmetic mean Traditional transaction methods Transactional profit methods

26 SectionNature of Undertakings covered 80IAUndertakings engaged in Developing, operating and maintaining, developing and operating and maintaining infrastructure facilities Generation/ transmission or distribution of power Reconstruction/ revival of power generating plants 80IBUndertakings located/ engaged in Industrially backward districts as notified; Scientific research & development Refining of mineral oil/ commercial production of natural gas Operating cold chain facility for agricultural produce Processing, preservation and packing of meat/ meat products or poultry/ marine/ dairy products Operating and maintaining a hospital of specified capacity 80ICUndertaking located in notified Centre/ Parks/ Areas in Sikkim Himachal Pradesh/ Uttaranchal North- Eastern states 80IDUndertaking engaged in business of hotel/ convention centre in specified areas/ districts 10AAUndertakings having a Special Economic Zone unit

27  anti-abuse provision brought to check the excessive tax holiday claims  Generic framework of ‘More than ordinary profit’ was provided in law to compute the excessive tax holiday claims  To plug the loophole, it is now proposed to compute more than ordinary profits through the ‘arm’s length price’ mechanism Issues ◦Eligible business will have to justify the ALP of the transactions between the eligible unit/ business and any other person having close connection ◦The term “Close Connection” not defined ◦Burden of the proving the “close connection” between the assessee and other party is on TPO Impact ◦Loss of tax holiday claim in excess of arm’s length profits ◦No corresponding adjustment allowed for other party for adjustments made, if any, by the TPO for transactions falling under this category

28  Industries operating in SEZs  Infrastructure Developers  Infrastructure Operator  Telecom Services  Industrial Park Developers  Power Generations or Transmission

29  Interest free Loans to Group Companies Sub section 8 of Section 80IA  Granting of Corporate Guarantees/ Performance Guarantees by Parent Company to its subsidiaries Sub section 8 of Section 80IA  Intra-group purchase/ sell/ service transactions Sub section 8 of Section 80IA  Payment made to key personnel e.g. transaction with Directors/CFO/CEO etc.. Section 40A(2)(b)  Payment made to key personnel of Group Companies. Section 40A(2)(b)  Payment made to relative of key personnel of the assessee/group companies. Section 40A(2)(b)

30  Commission to relatives of the directors/ partners  Salary paid to the relatives of the directors/Partners  Remuneration to the directors  Extra Purchase Price and Interest foregone to relatives  Good sold at lower than market price if bona fide  Higher Purchase Price than rates prevailing in the market  Interest paid to sister concerns at rate higher than normal rates  Hire Charges of Machinery or Rent paid for use of Immovable property

31  Maintenance of detailed TP Documentation, as specified in rule 10D demonstrating compliance with the ALP  Filing an Accountants’ report (Form 3CEB), certified by a Chartered Accountant with tax authorities containing details of specified domestic transactions

32 DefaultNature of penalty In case of a post-inquiry adjustment, there is deemed to be a concealment of income 100-300% of tax on the adjusted amount Failure to maintain documents2% of the value of each international transaction or specified domestic transaction Failure to furnish documents2% of the value of each international transaction or specified domestic transaction Failure to report a transaction in accountants report 2% of the value of each international transaction or specified domestic transaction Maintaining or furnishing incorrect information or documents 2% of the value of each international transaction or specified domestic transaction However, penalty for concealment of income shall not be levied if the taxpayer demonstrates that price charged or paid has been determined in ‘good faith’ and with ‘due diligence’

33 33 Type of payments/ transactions Challenges Salary and Bonuses paid to the partners Remuneration paid to the Directors Transfer of land Joint Development agreements Project management fees Allocation of expenses between the same taxpayer having an eligible unit and non-eligible unit Definition of Related Party Benchmarking? Whether the limit as mentioned in section 40 (b) would be the ALP? Benchmarking? Whether the limit as mentioned in Schedule XIII would be the ALP? Rules defined by Local Authorities (Jantri) as ALP? Benchmarking? Whether these allocation would be SDT – Sec 80-IA(10)? Directly v/s Indirectly

34 34 1.Transfer pricing provisions are not applicable in case where income is not chargeable to tax at all. [Amiantit International Holding Ltd., (2010) 322 ITR 678 (AAR)] 2. Provisions of section 40A(2) are not applicable to a co-operative society. [CIT vs. Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.(2008) 301 ITR 191 (Bom.)] 3.Payment made by holding co. to subsidiary co. is not covered u/s 40A(2)(b), as the relationship does not fall under sub-clause (ii) nor under sub-clause (iv) of sec. 40A(2)(b). [CIT vs. V.S.Dempo & Co. (P) Ltd. (2011) 336 ITR 209 (Bom.) Note: In this decision, clause (vi) of s. 40A(2)(b) was not considered. 4.When a person commits an offence by not maintaining the books of accounts as contemplated by section 44AA, the offence is complete. After that there can be no possibility of any offence as contemplated by section 44AB and therefore, the imposition of penalty is erroneous. [Surajmal Parasmal Todi vs. CIT (1996) 222 ITR 691 (Gauhati)] Note : This decision may be helpful in the context of sections 271AA, 271G and 271BA. 5. Correlative adjustments - if excessive or unreasonable expenses are disallowed in the hands of tax payer at time of the assessment then corresponding adjustment to the income of the recipient will not be allowed in the hands of recipient of income. Hence, it would lead to double taxation in India.

35  Provisions applicable only to expenditure where payment is made or to be made ◦Does this include capital expenditure? – Section 40A(2)(b) ◦Does this include transactions without consideration? – Section 80IA(8) & 80IA(10) ◦Does threshold apply to the amount recorded in the Books of Account or Amount determine as per ALP?  Whether Government approval u/s 295, 297 of the Companies Act would be relevant?  Whether close connection would be interpreted to mean the criteria mentioned in section 92A(2) or 40A(2)(b) (Inconsistency regarding definition of related parties

36  Does the limit of INR 50 million apply qua transaction or aggregate of all transactions ?  If aggregate of International and Domestic transaction exceeds INR 50 million, but the International Transactions are below INR 10 million, Do we need to maintain documents prescribe under Rule 10D? ( Reference Rule 10D(2)  Would claim of Depreciate comes under the ambit of Domestic Transfer Pricing?

37  How are SDT defined? ◦The following transactions with the aggregate value exceeding INR 50 million are covered  Expenditure for which payment is made or to be made to specified domestic parties  Transfer of goods or services to/from eligible business ( tax holiday) from/to other business ( non-tax holiday undertaking)  Business transactions between eligible business ( tax holiday unit) and other person(s) producing more than ordinary profits owing to close connection  Which tax payers covered under SDT? ◦Any tax payer incurring any expenditure with specified Domestic related parties are required to comply the regulation

38  How do you define specified domestic related party? ◦The domestic related party will inter alia include a director, a relative of the director, a person having substantial interest in the tax payer ( carrying not less than 20% of the voting power) and fellow related parties where a single person has substantial interest in two tax payers  Which are the illustrative list of SDT? ◦Transaction between the specified persons and also between the inter-unit transactions of taxpayers would be covered e.g. normal operating transactions, allocation of costs, etc…

39  What are the compliance requirements for tax payers that have SDT? Tax payer that have specified Domestic Transaction would need to do the following:  Identify the nature of Transactions  Maintain requisite information and documents as prescribed  Obtain and furnish a prescribed report from an accountant in Form 3CEB

40  Applicability of OECD TP guidelines  Advance Pricing Arrangement  Benefit of range  Rule 10D and Form 3CEB requires modification to harmonise their applicability in relation to inter-units pricing and reporting of domestic transactions  Corresponding adjustment

41


Download ppt " In domestic transactions, the under invoicing of sales and over-invoicing of expenses ordinarily will be revenue neutral in nature except in two circumstances."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google