1. Welfare Reform Act Alex Holmes Jordan Harvey-Morgan Joe Davenport Reagan Churan September 27, 2010

2. Part I: Background Research The Welfare Reform Act

3. Major Provisions of the Legislation It got rid of the Aid to Dependent Children/ Aid to Families with Dependent Children It requires most people receiving welfare to engage in job activities (ie. Job experience, community service, vocational school) Regulates how long a family can be on welfare. State powers.

4. Explanations The Aid to Dependent Children/ Aid to Families with Dependent Children made it possible for single mothers of dependent children to stay at home and take care of their children. No more than two years could pass before the parents had to be in a job, or in job training. No recipient could have more than five years of assistance cumulatively. It allowed the state to lessen allocations and also limit the time a family was on welfare. The Aid to Dependent Children/ Aid to Families with Dependent Children made it possible for single mothers of dependent children to stay at home and take care of their children. No more than two years could pass before the parents had to be in a job, or in job training. No recipient could have more than five years of assistance cumulatively. It allowed the state to lessen allocations and also limit the time a family was on welfare.

5. OppositionOpposition Republicans wanted all able bodied people to work, including single mothers. Republicans also opposed continuing federal promises to feed and offer medical care to dependent children. Liberals thought that the bill that was signed was too harsh, and that the work requirements were unreasonable. Liberals also felt that it effectively ended welfare. Republicans wanted all able bodied people to work, including single mothers. Republicans also opposed continuing federal promises to feed and offer medical care to dependent children. Liberals thought that the bill that was signed was too harsh, and that the work requirements were unreasonable. Liberals also felt that it effectively ended welfare.

6. Rationale This bill was not easy to pass. President Clinton vetoed two bills before signing the final one. There was considerable criticism of the bill from both parties. President Clinton originally started out trying to make welfare more accessible to lower class Americans.

7. Part II: Issues with Federalism The Welfare Reform Act

8. The violated reserved power The power to pass pass laws that deal with the welfare of citizens resides with the state The federal government is able to regulate this because of its relation to 1. Social Security. 2. Necessary and proper clause

9. The Liberal View The reform makes it too difficult for single mothers to survive along with their children It has reduced poverty substantially

10. The Conservative View Minimize welfare ◦It begins to do more bad than good for many  Dependence on welfare lowers the IQ of children

11. The Libertarian View The government should do away with the social welfare system. ◦The government has spent more than 3.5 trillion dollars on ending poverty and it has only created more poverty The crime rate soars for people who are on welfare

12. Issues with the Federal Government: One of the main issues that the federal government had with the Welfare Reform Act was its role in it. In some aspects of it, the government has been viewed as too intrusive while assisting families. There is also an issue with financing the Act without altering taxes. An even larger issue is dependency. Support from the government could encourage many families to stop looking for work. The Act gives the States the power to set its own time limit on the federal aid. But aid is denied to those on welfare for more than five years. So the issue is certain recipients losing eligibility for welfare as a result of state time limits.

13. Other Relevant Issues: Going along with Nixon’s “New Federalisms”, The Welfare Reform Act increased government involvement in welfare programs. It gave more power to the States, but also created restrictions on how the money could be spent. It reduced the control that the federal government had on grants as well.