Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

V.N.Prilepskaya, А.А.Kuzemin, Т.А.Nazarenko, Т.М.Astahova Research Centre of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Perinatology, Moscow Mifepriston in emergency contraception.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "V.N.Prilepskaya, А.А.Kuzemin, Т.А.Nazarenko, Т.М.Astahova Research Centre of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Perinatology, Moscow Mifepriston in emergency contraception."— Presentation transcript:

1 V.N.Prilepskaya, А.А.Kuzemin, Т.А.Nazarenko, Т.М.Astahova Research Centre of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Perinatology, Moscow Mifepriston in emergency contraception

2 Main directions in the study of emergency contraception:  Creation of the International Consortium on Emergency Contraception  Enhancement of the WHO studies on that theme  Study of efficacy and comparison of different methods (Youzpe method, levonorgestrel and mifepriston in different doses)  Prolongation of an interval after an unprotected sex (from 72 tо 120 hrs)

3 Three regimens have been studied for emergency contraception Randomized double blind study in 15 family planning clinics in 10 countries 4136 healthy women with regular menstrual cycle).  Single dose of levonorgestrel – 1,5 мg  Two doses of levonorgestrel with an interval of 12 hrs  Single dose of Mifepriston – 10mg

4 Conclusion  «All three regimens are very efficient for emergency contraception and prevent a high per cent of pregnancies if taken during the first 5 days» Helene von Hertzen et al. Lancet 2002, 360:1803-10

5 Мifepriston Synthetic steroid, derivative of nortetisteron with antigestagen activity. Main indication is medical abortion Additional indications:  Treatment of uterine leyomyoma  Emergency contraception

6 Mifepriston (tablets 10 мg, Мir-Pharm)  As a means of emergency contraception mifepriston was registered after clinical trials and was approved for clinical practice in Russia in 2004

7 Objectives  To assess efficacy and safety of low-dose mifepristone(10мг) as a method of emergency contraception

8 Clinical Trials  Clinical trials on these indications were carried out for the first time at the Research center of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Perinatology of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Russia  Coordinator of the trial - Member of the Academy of the Medical Sciences Vladimir I. Kulakov  A total of 30 women were included in this trial

9 Inclusion criteria:  Unprotected sex not more than 72 hrs tо visit  Reproductive age  Regular menstrual cycle during the last three months  No of psychic pathology  Patient informed consent

10 Exclusion criteria:  Using of other contraceptive methods  Postpartum period  Adrenal insufficiency  Thromboses in the medical/family history  Severe diabetes mellitus  Genital tumor

11 Indications for emergency contraception  Absence of any contraception in regular sexual life (25)  Failure of condom (2)  IUD expulsion during the cycle of the study (2)  Sexual abuse (1)  Age from 18 to 33 years, mean age 23,8+/- 1,7 years

12 Methods of study  Clinical (medical history, examinations etc.)  Questionnaire  Blood/urine tests, biochemical tests  Bacterioscopy of vaginal discharge  Tests for genital infections, HIV  Sonography of pelvis organs with Doppler modes  HCG test in blood  Progesterone test in blood

13 Study design included four visits:  Screening  7-8th days after the intended menstrual period  7-8 th days of the following menstrual period  Two months later the 3-rd visit

14  No pregnancies А) verified by sonography В) verified by HCG Basic criteria - a number of pregnancies/ number of women using Mifepriston Parameters of efficiency

15 FINDINGS:

16  No pregnancies in 30 patients

17 Results:  Side effects: long (in average up to 46 days) or postponed cycles - 34-36 days - in 5 (16%) patients on 2 – 3 visits  Cycle was regular in all patients - by the 4 visit  None of any other side effects

18 By the 4 th visit all 300 patients had regular cycles 28-30 40-46 34-36 28-30 Namber of days

19 Remote results of examination (2-3 months after the 3 visit)  Regular menstrual cycle was in all patients  Mean duration of mensyrual cycle of 28,1+/-3,2 days  Mean duration of menstruation 5,4+/-0,7

20 Conclusion Results of the study testify of the following: Results of the study testify of the following:  High efficacy of Mifepriston in a single dose taken during 72 hrs as a method of emergency contraception  Its good tolerance  Normalizations of cycles in due time

21 Conclusion  «Mifepriston delayed ovulation that means prolonged cycle and delayed of following menstrual cycle»

22 Drawbacks: 1. Small number of cases 2. No of control group

23 Further investigations  Comparison of Mifepriston effect in the dose of 10 мg in different regimens of use: 72 and 120 hrs after unprotected sex Intended design: 150 patients in each group

24 Thank you for your attention


Download ppt "V.N.Prilepskaya, А.А.Kuzemin, Т.А.Nazarenko, Т.М.Astahova Research Centre of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Perinatology, Moscow Mifepriston in emergency contraception."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google