1. The International Aspect: Language, Learning and Teaching Györgyi Dudás and Zsuzsanna Soproni Iatefl Conference, Eger, Hungary 2012

2. IE or LF? We are cancel the card. It don’t depend on the field. They need to be persuade the customer. I can suggest you a cheap accomodation. We can make a consense. I think on the front page should be a picture who – which only makes people to spend money to the charity. (Seidlhofer, 2000) Let’s resume our ideas. (Dudley-Evans & St. John, 1998)

3. Lingua Franca or Pidgin English – a definition and characteristics What it is: a dynamically evolving language used by native and non-native speakers of English for effective international business communication, which is functional, neutral and cultureless What it is not: Tarzan English, Newspeak, Ericsson English, Policespeak, Airspeak, Common European Language, Cantonese-Chinese business-pidgin

4. Statistics 340-450 millionL1 240-350 millionL2 ?FL Chrystal, 1997, pp. 60-61.

5. International Business Communication Language Knowledge

6. Earlier Research In-service and pre-service professionals Native English speakers/teachers and non-native English speakers/teachers

7. The IBS Context NationalitySs%NationalitySs% Iranian192,02%Norwegian171,81% Cameroonian192,02%Russian272,87% Kazakhstani293,08%Romanian262,76% Chinese404,25%Serbian161,70% Hungarian56960,47%Slovakian192,02% Moldovian333,51%Turkish515,42% German181,91%Ukrainian161,70% Nigerian252,66%Vietnamese171,81% Total941100,00% Active Ss on English medium courses

8. Sample N=152

9. Tool 34 item self-report questionnaire with Likert type statements E.g. I am satisfied with the progress I have made in English since September. (SUCCESS) Studying with international students has contributed greatly to my development in English. (INTL)

10. Findings Language Learning Teaching

11. Language Success in language learning is accompanied by code-switching. Corr=0,49; p<0,01 Successful learners tend to do and notice code-switching more. Mean hisuc = 3,91t (128) = -5,051 Mean losuc = 3,33p<0,01

12. Language More motivated learners communicate more in English. Mean himotiv = 4,53t (141) = -3,310 Mean lomotiv = 4,0p=0,03 Successful learners prefer to communicate with peers who have a higher command of English. Mean hisuc = 0,78t (122) = -2,739 Mean losuc = 0,56p<0,01

13. Language More motivated learners appreciate IBS English modules more. Successful learners communicate more in English. Mean hisuc = 4,49t (126) = -2,385 Mean losuc = 4,08p < 0,05

14. ‘I prefer to communicate with students whose level of English is … mine.’

15. Learning More motivated learners benefit more from the international environment. Mean himotiv = 3,8t (142)=- 2,176 Mean lomotiv = 3,51p=0,03

16. ‘Learning is the same everywhere in the world.’

18. Learning ‘Learning is the same everywhere in the world.’ The higher the competence, the larger extent students disagree. Mean E = 3,73 Mean 4 = 3,58p=0,27 Mean 6 = 2,97p=0,18 Mean 8 = 2,65

19. The fact that there are students whose mother tongue is different from mine motivates me to learn foreign languages.

20. Teaching ‘IBS teacher adapt to the needs of students coming from different cultures.’

21. Babcock, R. D., & Du-Babcock, B. (2001). Language-based communication zones in international business communication. Journal of Business Communication, 38(4), 372-412. Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman. Chrystal, D. (1997). English as a global language. Cambridge University Press.. Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M.J. (1998). Developments in ESP. A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chapter 4: English for Business Purposes (pp.53-73). Gimenez, J. (2006). Embedded business emails: Meeting new demands in international business communication. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 154-172. Gupta, A. F. (2006). Standard English in the world. In R. Rubdy and M. Saraceni (Eds.), 2006. English in the world: Global rules, global roles. London: Continuum, 95-109. utchinson, T. & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learner-centred approach. Cambridge: CUP. Kachru, B.B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: the English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk & H. G. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the world (11-30. CUP. Nickerson, C. (2005). English as a lingua franca in international business contexts. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 367-380. Olagboyega, K. W. (2007). Varieties of modern English language. Akita University. Rogerson-Revell, P. (2007). Using English for international business: a European case study. English for Specific Purposes, 26, 103-120. Seidlhofer, B. (2000). Mind the gap: English as a mother tongue vs. English as a lingua franca. VIEWS, 9/1, 51-68. Sharifian, F. (2009). English as an international language: Perspectives and pedagogical issues. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Spichtinger, D. (2000). EIL: a global, a European and an Austrian perspective. VIEWS, 10/1, 48-59. Widdowson, H.G. (1997). EIL, ESL, EFL: Global issues and local interests. World Englishes, 16/1, 135-146. Widdowson, H. G. (2003). Defining issues in language teaching. Oxford: OUP. Widdowson, H.G. (2004). Text, context, pretext. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. References

22. Thank you for your attention. gydudas@ibs-b.hu zssoproni@ibs-b.hu