Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Plant Hardening August 2008.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Plant Hardening August 2008."— Presentation transcript:

1 Plant Hardening August 2008

2 Architecture

3 Service Deployments Issues / Concerns Current Plant Performance
“There will be operational challenges.” Costs Current Plant Performance Connections Operating Signal Levels Plant quality Technology changes and the effect on plant performance Line conditioning tools

4 Operational Costs $135,000 fixing the plant Example:
15,000 subscribers 4,500 annual service calls (30%) $337,500 per call) 1,800 related to the drop plant (40%) $135,000 fixing the plant Kajola-Kristada

5 Changing Modulation Schemes
Service Calls Changing Modulation Schemes Increasing the modulation scheme will carry more data in the same bandwidth QPSK to 16 QAM to 32 QAM 64 QAM to 256 QAM and beyond…. Increasing the modulation scheme demands improved performance in the system to obtain similar results From QPSK to 16QAM theoretically demands an additional 4-6dB noise improvement Signal levels can be adjusted to overcome the CNR but this may have significant negative effects on the distortion parameters.

6 Why does performance need to improve?
Increasing subscriber penetration for 2 way digital services decreases C/N and increases MER Less BW per subscriber requires advanced modulation techniques to deliver more Network requires better performance to deliver the same quality BER 50% 40% 30% 20% CNR Kajola-Kristada

7 Increasing the modulation scheme requires additional headroom above the threshold.
Strong / Good Good Video (forward path) BAD High Speed Data NO VoIP Functional Operating Level Carrier to Noise BER Service Threshold with 16 QAM Intermittent Service Threshold with QPSK No Service Weak / Poor 5 MHz Return Band Frequency 42 MHz

8 Why it may be a challenge
Strong / Good Ingress – Typically limits the upstream of the 5-15 MHz range Functional Operating Level Intermittent Service Threshold No Service Weak / Poor 5 MHz Return Band Frequency 42 MHz

9 Plant RF Impairments Micro-Reflections; Ingress Noise;Group delay; CPD
Good Video Slower High Speed Data Functioning VoIP Strong / Good Functional Operating Level VoIP / HSD Carrier Intermittent VoIP / HSD Carrier Service Threshold No Service Weak / Poor 5 MHz Return Band Frequency 42 MHz

10 Slow or No High Speed Data
Plant Issue’s Water Migration, Poor Installation Practice, Connection Issue’s Strong / Good Corrected Functional Operating Level Good Video Possible Slow High Speed Data or.. Intermittent VoIP Connector Issue VoIP / HSD Carrier Good Video Possible Slow or No High Speed Data No VoIP Intermittent Service Threshold No Service Weak / Poor 5 MHz Return Band Frequency 42 MHz

11 Ingress degrades quality lowering threshold.
Significantly effects forward error correction which results in packet loss and loss of connection for VoIP (high speed data as well) It is caused by Craft errors Damaged cable / connectors Un-terminated ports Poor RF shielding on components Moisture penetration Strong / Good Functional Operating Level Service Threshold Service Threshold No Service Weak / Poor 5 MHz Return Band Frequency 42 MHz

12 Ways to improve performance.
Segment the node by adding additional forward and return optics. Improves Noise and Distortion Increases BW per sub CMTS and DOCSIS technology that lower the threshold Use Line Conditioning Tools Step Attenuators Filters Clean up (or harden) the plant Add additional Return Bandwidth beyond 42 MHz and / or increase upper limit to 1GHz. Kajola-Kristada

13 * Step 1 Functional Intermittent No Service Operating Level
Low value Tap, a step attenuator has been installed lowering the entire return band Noise / Ingress and Data Carrier(s)1 Strong / Good Hub or Head end Network Docsis Modem – Fwd Receiver and Return Data Carrier Functional CMTS Operating Level Carrier to Noise BER Example: 12 dB Step Attn Intermittent Service Threshold No Service Weak / Poor 5 MHz Return Band Frequency 42 MHz

14 Line Conditioning Step Attenuators * Step 2
The CMTS “Auto Level” will turn up the Data Carrier to the original level no longer impaired by the ingress. Strong / Good CMTS Network Docsis Modem – Fwd Receiver and Return Data Carrier Functional Operating Level Carrier to Noise BER Example: 12 dB Step Attn Intermittent Service Threshold No Service Weak / Poor 5 MHz Return Band Frequency 42 MHz Kajola-Kristada

15 Plant Hardening Plant Hardening Hardline Drop General Comments
Impedance, Micro-Reflections CPD Hardline Drop General Comments

16 Customer Experience

17 Customer Experience

18 Operating Condition Snug It Up Kajola-Kristada

19

20

21 Signal reflections occur throughout the cable plant and are called micro-reflections.
They are caused by the individual slight errors in impedance match. The severity of the mismatch is measured by the magnitude of the return-loss ratio. The larger the return loss, the better, perfection is infinite. Mismatches may include connectors, mis-installed products, poor construction and damaged cable. For example - If a lousy splice block is installed approximately 150 feet past an amplifier. The splice, which may only have a 12 dB return loss, reflects signals back upstream that has been attenuated by 13.5 dB (1.5 dB in cable attenuation plus the return loss of the splice). The reflected signals then arrive back at the output of the amplifier attenuated by a total of 15 dB (1.5 dB additional cable loss for the upstream trip plus the previous 13.5 dB). The signals are now reflected by the amplifiers output mismatch, A return loss of 16 dB is common. At this point, the reflected signal has an amplitude that is 31 dB below the primary signal and delayed by the round-trip propagation through 300 feet of cable, which takes about 350 ns. The signal is horizontally delayed approximately 1/7 inch on a 27-inch television set. This is not enough to become a visible ghost or second image. However, depending on the relative phases of the RF carriers of the primary and reflected signal, the visual effect may be enough to cause a softening of a previously well-defined luminance level transition. With repeated mismatches, the crispness of the pictures may be noticeably reduced. This softening effect is easily seen on displays of character-generated text pages. Kajola-Kristada

22 CPD Common Path Distortion, also known as PIM: Passive InterModulation
Only occurs where downstream and upstream share the same path Amplifier, Tap, and Passive ports It is a diode effect that creates intermod products usually at 6 MHz intervals Accentuated with higher signals

23 What causes CPD? Contact problems cause non-linear effects:
Oxidized contact surfaces Contaminated contact surfaces Too low contact pressure Loose components

24 Ref. Level 500 kHz 15 MHz 25 MHz 12/05/2004

25 Plant Trouble Calls Kajola-Kristada

26 Hardline Cable is defined Connector to equipment interface is defined
Connector to cable interface defined

27 Hardline Cable Prep “A” – Center Conductor “B” – Core Depth “X” and “Y” – No Burrs or Rough Edges

28 Typical Hardline Connector Retention Forces
Cable Size Center Conductor Force (lbs) Outer Conductor Force (lbs) Combined Force (lbs) 100 250 400 150 350 500 .565 175 575 .625 200 600 .700 225 425 650 .715 .750 450 700 .840 275 475 750 .860 315 480 795 .875 300 800 1.000 – 1.125 950 1.160 375 1025 Typical Hardline Connector Retention Forces

29

30 Drop The cable is defined The connector male and female is defined
Established test procedures for electrical, mechanical and environmental performance.

31

32 Architecture In-House
Modem Fwd and Ret Levels Ground block to code Old TV Appliance Noise Off Air signals Architecture In-House DC Motor Noise AC Unit Florescent Lights Cordless Phone Video Games Fan Motor Noise Cable Damage Hardening

33 Summary Improving the Network
Tighten the plant Line Conditioning Reducing Node Sizes CMTS / DOCSIS advancements The Drop Plant may very well still be the weakest link. Connections (Moisture and Loose connectors) cost $$ F-Connectors, F-81’s, Terminators

34 Thanks


Download ppt "Plant Hardening August 2008."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google