1. Department of Defense Office of Economic Adjustment Defense Communities Town Hall June 5, 2014

2. BRAC Downsizing (Exclusive of Guard and Reserve Sites) Alaska Hawaii Guam Puerto Rico AF Research Lab Mesa Red River Army Depot Lone Star AAP Concord NWS Seal Beach Riverbank AAP Umatilla Chemical Depot Chanute AFB Grand Forks AFB Buckley Annex Pueblo Chemical Depot Niagara Falls USARC Kansas AAP Newport Chem Depot Walter Reed AMC Fort Monroe Fort Monmouth Fort McPherson Fort Gillem Willow Grove NAS/JRB Newport Naval Station Brunswick Naval Air Station NSA New Orleans Fort Lawton Roosevelt Roads Naval Station Legend BRAC

3. Base Realignment and Closure Community Assistance $115,149,644 in OEA grant assistance has been provided to BRAC 2005 Property Disposal (as of 09/30/13) 75,000 BRAC 2005 excess acres 43,418 acres disposed (58%) 11 Economic Development Conveyances totaling 30,804 acres have been approved to support projected creation of 20,550 new jobs Success stories Challenges HUD approvals Transition from OEA assistance Federal partners have limited funds Environment Property transfer delays Benchmark local experiences

4. Compatible Use (JLUS) Alaska Hawaii Guam Puerto Rico Legend JLUS Sacramento Camp Roberts Maneuver TS Travis AFB Ventura County NB Camp Rilea Klamath Falls ANG Kitsap NB Lewis-McChord JB Fallon NAS Camp Williams TS Fort William Harrison Ellsworth AFB Minot AFB Fort Wainwright/ Eielson AFB Phoenix Yuma Proving Ground Seal Beach NWS El Centro NAF San Diego Metro Region Point Loma NB San Diego NB Coronado NB White Sands Missile Range/ Holloman AFB/ Fort Bliss Camp Swift Dyess AFB NAS JRB Fort Worth Kingsville NAS/ Orange Grove NALF Lackland AFB Randolph AFB San Antonio JB Sheppard AFB Maxwell AFB Redstone Arsenal Fort Riley Camp Ashland Greenlief TS Offutt AFB Camp Clark Nevada MTA Camp Crowder Fort Leonard Wood Columbus AFB NAS Meridian Crane NSA Boone NGC New Orleans NAS JRB Gulfport NCBC Keesler AFB Tyndall AFB Dobbins ARB Fort Pickett Seymour Johnson AFB/MTRs/MTAs Cherry Point MCAS Dare County Range Fort A.P. Hill Quantico MCB Wallops Island SCSC Yorktown NWS Fort Indiantown GAP ARNG Auburn TS Andrews NAF/ Washington JB Stones Ranch MR Mass. MR/JBCC Hampton Roads NW Annex NSA Charleston JB Shaw AFB Kings Bay NSB Fort Gordon Beaufort MCAS/ Parris Island MCRD Raleigh Ethan Allen Firing Range South Potomac NSA/ Indian Head NSF Aberdeen Proving Ground Patuxent River NAS South Potomac NSA/ Dahlgren NSF

5. Compatible Use Community Assistance $12,019,663 in assistance across 70+ projects (17 nominations in FY14) Partnering to Preserve Our Military Presence Prevent further encroachment of our local military operations Only program where local military sits down with the local community (with Federal funds) to address compatibility issues Challenges Climate change adaptation Energy siting decisions Multi-jurisdictions Environmental preservation Benchmark local experiences

6. Defense Industry Adjustment (DIA) Alaska Hawaii Guam Puerto Rico Legend DIA Anniston Army Depot State of Arizona Solano County University of Michigan, Ohio State University, Purdue University Texarkana Oshkosh State of Connecticut Commonwealth of Massachusetts Commonwealth of Virginia Allen County

7. DoD Industry Adjustment Response Program Access – Communities self-identify and request assistance May 20, 2014 Federal Funding Opportunity announcement Eligibility – Job loss of 2,500 in an MSA, 1,000 outside MSA, or 1% of local workforce – Direct and significant adverse impact on a community or its residents Funding – $48.6M budgeted for FY14 – $58.1M requested for FY15

8. Public Schools on Military Installations (PSMI) Alaska Hawaii Guam Puerto Rico Legend PMSI Fort Riley Fort Bliss Fort Sill Kirtland AFB Dugway Proving Ground Edwards AFB NAWS China Lake San Diego NB USMC Camp Pendleton Travis AFB NAS Lemoore JB Lewis McChord Wheeler/ Schofield AAF NSA HR/ Norfolk Fort Belvoir JB McGuire – Dix – Lakehurst Fort Polk

9. Public Schools on Military Installations  Funding – OEA was provided $770M (FY2011: $250M; FY2012: $250M; FY2013: $270M) to construct, renovate, repair, or expand elementary and secondary public schools on military installations to address capacity or facility condition deficiencies identified on the Secretary’s Priority List.  Sequestration – $43.9M reduction due to FY13 sequestration. While there was no FY14 sequestration impact, unobligated funds remain subject to future sequestration reductions.  Obligations to Date – $371.3M  Average DOD Investment – $24.7M/project Funding (in Millions)

10. Roads Program (RP) Alaska Hawaii Guam Puerto Rico Legend RP Walter Reed NMMC – Bethesda JB Lewis McChord JB San Antonio Fort Belvoir

11. Transportation Infrastructure Improvements Transportation infrastructure improvements associated with medical facilities related to BRAC 2005 recommendations - $300M (available until expended) Program authority - Section 8110, P.L. 112-10 Executed $290.13M, using competitive process, through grants to local and state governmental entities and Federal interagency arrangements with Department of Transportation 8 projects across several bases: Walter Reed Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD; San Antonio National Military Medical Center, TX; Fort Belvoir Community Hospital, VA; and Madigan Army Medical Center, JB Lewis-McChord, WA OEA’s construction grant implementation and monitoring activity will extend beyond 2017 11

12. Total OEA Programs Alaska HawaiiPuerto Rico Legend BRACRTA JLUS PSMI MGRP DIAGuam Guam Northern Mariana Islands Richmond Andersen AFB NCTS Finegayan Tinian (North Field) Saipan

13. OEA GRANTS ADMINISTRATION Revised Federal Grant Guidance OMB consolidated 8 Federal grants circulars into one “super circular”, effective 12/26/13 DoD issuance of implementation regulations targeted for 12/26/14 2 CFR part 200, “Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards” What This Means for OEA Grantees Changes ahead Grantees need to be informed of the revised requirements (see OEA website) Anticipate additional requirements and processes  Prior to grant award: pre-award risk assessment, grantee internal controls  Post-award: on-site monitoring visits, compliance documentation OEA Response OEA organization and personnel changes Information and updates on OEA’s website and through Project Managers “Kick-off meetings” with grantees to review grant award terms and conditions Planned: webinars and tutorials on OEA’s website; improved user-friendly guidance, drop- down menus and templates in EADS II