1. 1 Managing Flow Variability: Safety Inventory Centralization and ROP At- Ft; Decentralized vs. Centralized

2. 2 Managing Flow Variability: Safety Inventory Centralization and ROP What is the optimal inventory level at each WH? Demand N~(100,10^2) Warehouse A Demand N~(100,10^2) Warehouse B Demand N~(100,10^2) Central Warehouse Demand N~(100,10^2) What is the optimal target inventory level at CWH?

3. 3 Managing Flow Variability: Safety Inventory Physical Centralization Demand in the two warehouses are independent. Both warehouses have the same distribution for their lead time demand. LTD 1 : N(LTD, σ LTD ) LTD 2 : N(LTD, σ LTD ) Both warehouses have identical service levels To provide desired SL, each location must carry I safety = zσ LTD z is determined by the desired service level The total safety inventory in the decentralized system is I safety = zσ LTD

4. 4 Managing Flow Variability: Safety Inventory Independent Lead time demands at two locations LTD C = LTD 1 + LTD 2 Centralization reduced the safety inventory by a factor of 1/√2 LTD C = LTD + LTD = 2 LTD

5. 5 Managing Flow Variability: Safety Inventory Independent Lead time demands at two locations GE lighting operating 7 warehouses throughout Europe. A warehouse with average lead time demand of 20,000 units with a standard deviation of 5,000 units and a 95% service level. What would be the impact on safety inventory if they are replaced Centralize Europe Warehouse. I safety = 1.65×5000= 8250 Decrease in safety inventory by a factor of Centralization of N locations: Independent demand in N locations: Total safety inventory to provide a specific SL increases not by N but by √N

6. 6 Managing Flow Variability: Safety Inventory independent Lead time demands at N locations In Waiting Line; Centralization (Polling) leads to flow time reduction and throughput improvement. In Inventory; Centralization leads to reduction in Cycle Inventory, reduction in Safety Inventory, and flow time reduction. If centralization of stocks reduces inventory, why doesn’t everybody do it? – Longer response time – Higher shipping cost – Less understanding of customer needs – Less understanding of cultural, linguistics, and regulatory barriers These disadvantages may reduce the demand.

7. 7 Managing Flow Variability: Safety Inventory Dependent Demand Does centralization offer similar benefits when demands in multiple locations are correlated? LTD 1 and LTD 2 are statistically identically distributed but correlated with a correlation coefficient of ρ. No Correlation: ρ close to 0 If LTD 1 and LTD 2 are independent   =0

8. 8 Managing Flow Variability: Safety Inventory + Correlation, + Perfect Correlation Negative Correlation: ρ close to -1 Positive Correlation: ρ close to 1 Perfect Negative Correlation: ρ = -1 Perfect Positive Correlation: ρ = +1

9. 9 Managing Flow Variability: Safety Inventory Correlation The safety inventory in the two-location decentralized system is larger than in the centralized system by a factor of If demand is positively fully correlated, ρ = 1, centralization offers no benefits in the reduction of safety inventory Benefits of centralization increases as the demand on the two locations become negatively correlated. The best case is  = -1, where we do not need safety inventory at all

10. 10 Managing Flow Variability: Safety Inventory Principle of Aggregation and polling Inventory Inventory benefits  due to principle of aggregation. Statistics: Standard deviation of sum of random variables is less than the sum of the individual standard deviations. Physical consolidation is not essential, as long as available inventory is shared among various locations  Polling Inventory –Virtual Centralization –Specialization –Component Commonality –Delayed Differentiation –Product Substitution

11. 11 Managing Flow Variability: Safety Inventory Virtual Centralization Location A Exceeds Available stock 1. Information about product demand and availability must be available at both locations 2. Shipping the product from one location to a customer at another location must be fast and cost effective Location B Less than Available stock Virtual Centralization: inventory polling in a network of locations is facilitated using information regarding availability of goods and subsequent transshipment of goods between locations to satisfy demand. polling is achieved by keeping the inventories at decentralized locations.

12. 12 Managing Flow Variability: Safety Inventory Specialization, Substitution Demand for both products exist in both locations. But a large portion of demand for P1 is in location A, while a large portion of demand for P2 is in location B. Both locations keep average inventory. Safety inventory is kept only in the specialized warehouse Location A Product P1 Location B Product P2 One other possibility to deal with variability is product substitution.

13. 13 Managing Flow Variability: Safety Inventory Component Commonality Up to now we have discussed aggregating demand across various geographic locations, either physical or virtual Aggregating demand across various products has the same benefits. Computer manufacturers: offer a wide range of models, but few components, CPU, RMA, HD, CD/DVD drive, are used across product lines. Replace Make-to-stock with make Make-to-Order Commonality + MTO: Commonality: Safety inventory of the common components much less than safety inventory of unique components stored separately. MTO: Inventory cost is computed in terms of WIP cost not in terms of finished good cost (which is higher).

14. 14 Managing Flow Variability: Safety Inventory Postponement (Delayed Differentiation) Forecasting Characteristic: Forecasts further into the future tends to be less accurate than those of more imminent events. Since shorter-range forecasts are more accurate, operational decisions will be more effective if supply is postponed closer to the point of actual demand. Two Alternative processes (each activity takes one week)  Alternative A: (1) Coloring the fabric, (2) assembling T-shirts  Alternative B: (1) Assembling T-shirts, (2) coloring the fabric No changes in flow time. Alternative B postponed the color difference until one week closer to the time of sale. Takes advantage of the forecasting characteristic: short-Range forecast more accurate.

15. 15 Managing Flow Variability: Safety Inventory Postponement (Delayed Differentiation) Two advantages: Taking advantage of two demand forecasting characteristics  Commonality Advantage: At week 0; Instead of forecast for each individual item, we forecast for aggregates item – uncolored T- shirt. Forecast for aggregate demand is more accurate than forecast for individual item. It is easier to more accurately forecast total demand for different colored T-shirts for next week than the week after the next.  Postponement Advantage: Instead of forecasting for each individual items two weeks ahead, we do it at week 1. Shorter rang forecasts are more accurate. It is easier to more accurately forecast demand for different colored T-shirts for next week than the week after the next.

16. 16 Managing Flow Variability: Safety Inventory Lessons Learned Levers for Reducing Safety Capacity  Reduce demand variability through improved forecasting  Reduce replenishment lead time  Reduce variability in replenishment lead time  poll safety inventory for multiple locations or products  Exploit product substitution  Use common components  Postpone product-differentiation processing until closer to the point of actual demand