1. Personal Views on the Test Plan Jan. 29, 2013 Masahiro Wada

2. contents 1.Introduction of KDDI and myself 2. My Position on the Testing Plan

3. 3 KDDI’s convergence strategy FTTHCATV

4. 4W3C Web and Automotive workshop, November 2012 Seamless Service Concept anytime, anywhere When we are going for journey by car….

5. Background The Open Web Platform has been highly expected as a HW/OS-independent new platform. The Open Web Platform is planned to be used in various appliances. The requirements have become advanced in functionality, quality, interoperability and performance. The Open Web Platform has become very complicated application platform.

6. Is HTML5 perfect ? Implementation difference exists among the browsers/ OS In some cases, processing performance of HTML5 is slower than the native apps or flash media. Difficulty of porting from other platforms (Android Java, Objective-C, C/C++) Lack of Security functions (DRM, exposure of source code,) – Expect the update of W3C spec. – Proprietary security key management between server and client.

7. Voice of Content Providers in Japan ■Technology Issues ・Most of CPs wait until HTML5 and the products become more stable. ・ Same service level provided by the native application cannot be achieved by the current mobile phone capability. ・ They don’t think to be able to provide satisfactory services to customers yet. ・Security issues (illegal access, DRM, …) ■Business Issues ・ No incentive to move from native application-based to HTML5-based because they are successful now! ・Very doubtful whether Web-based services become real business. ・Some “conducting wire” is necessary for HTML5-based service to become real business.

8. Goal of the Tests To obtain trust from Industry* that the Open Web Platform is reliable for their products. *non-PC manufacturers like TV and mobile devices, TV broadcasters and telecom operators Any application /content runs exactly in the same manner as the author intends on any OS on any hardware.

9. Necessary Tests Specification-based Test To verify the specification and check the conformance of the software products. Performed mainly by W3C. To focus on critical points of the specification User-viewpoint Test To verify the functionality, quality, reliability, inter- operability and performance of the software products. Carried out mainly by the industries. To test a use case that the specification designers have not thought of.

10. Specification-based Test Carried out by W3C members? On schedule? Outsourcing? Tests properly defined in detail? Who analyze and feed back the results? Management? Sufficient tests? Duplication? Who will examine?

11. User-viewpoint Test Test content/application approach Crowd-sourcing is essential Test Platform is mandatory test guidelines, database of test content/application guidance for authoring, reporting format mechanism for gathering and utilizing the test results process of analysis and feedback of the results Close relationship to outside parties is beneficial.

12. Development of Test Platform To write and run tests on the platform and obtain expected test results. Various stakeholders inside and outside W3C Various purposes such as implementation and functional or interoperability verification. Applicable for “both Tests”

13. Test Platform Concentrated and equipped with all the necessary means of tests Open for stakeholders outside W3C Steady operation of the platform Mechanism for utilizing the test results to improve quality and interoperability User support such as Q&A Continual improvement of the platform

14. Way of proceeding Dedicated Test Lab is necessary for Carrying out the Specification-based Test Hosting and managing the User-viewpoint Test Developing and operating the Test Platform Important points *On schedule *Appeal of the test successfully ongoing with evidence *Demonstration and exhibition on an appropriate occasion (such as CES)