Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBrandon Hudson Modified over 10 years ago
1
Happiness, Subjective Well-Being and Positive Affect
Louise Cooper, Lynne Doran, Derek Laffan & Sarah McSweeney.
2
Learning Outcomes Understand definitions of Happiness, Subjective Well-Being (SWB) & Positive Affect Understand theories of Happiness Be aware of the measures available for Happiness, SWB & Positive Affect Identify factors that influence happiness Be aware of global happiness Be aware of “happiness boosting” interventions and be able to apply it into your everyday life
3
Activity: What is Happiness?
Brainstorm
4
Subjective Well-Being
How people evaluate their own lives in terms of cognitive (life-satisfaction) and affective explanations (Boniwell, 2008) Various positive emotions, feelings and moods that we frequently experience and easily recognise (Boniwell, 2008) Positive Affect Happiness
5
Video Sonja Lyubomirsky – What is Happiness?
6
Three routes to happiness Seligman (2002)
The Pleasant Life Having many pleasures in life and the skills to amplify them The Good Life Knowing your signature strengths, and recreating your life (work, love, friendship, leisure, parenting) to use those strengths to have more ‘flow’ in life The Meaningful Life Using your signature strengths to serve something that you believe is larger than you are There are three very different routes to happiness. First the Pleasant Life, consisting in having as many pleasures as possible and having the skills to amplify the pleasures. This is, of course, the only true kind of happiness on the Hollywood view. Second, the Good Life, which consists in knowing what your signature strengths are, and then recrafting your work, love, friendship, leisure and parenting to use those strengths to have more flow in life. Third, the Meaningful Life, which consists of using your signature strengths in the service of something that you believe is larger than you are. Good and meaningful life fall into the umbrella of eudaimonia. Research shows that high levels of positive affect are long term with a eudaimonic route to happiness, versus, short-term with a hedonic route to happiness (Heffernon & Boniwell, 2011).
7
Set-Point Model
8
Adaptation Theory Strong reaction to recent events
High levels of happiness after winning the lotto Returns to set-point (3 months) Linked to ‘zero-sum’ theory Happy and unhappy periods are cyclical Brickman et al. (1978). Longitudinal study on “happiness among lotto winners” Hedonic Adaption Prevention Model Zero-sum theory suggests that happy periods in our life are followed inevitably followed by negative periods, which cancel each other out, therefore, any attempt to increase happiness will be unsuccessful. Brickman et al. (1978). Longitudinal study on “happiness among lotto winners” who were interviewed on basic demographic variables and questions about how their life had changed since winning. The lotto winners related their everyday events as less pleasurable that the control groups and were no happier than they were before winning. The lotto winners also scored the same as paraplegics and quadriplegics on happiness levels. This experiment supports the theory of hedonic adaptations, bad or good, we have a natural set-point that will inevitably return to. HAP Model is a proposed anicdote to adapatation is variety, Therefore, individuals must continually change their approach and happiness interventions in order to counteract any adaption mechanisms (Tzach & Luybomirski, 2006)
10
Discrepancy Theories Increase in wealth in the last 50 years but happiness levels have stayed the same, why? SWB is a function of comparison processes Social, past-self, internalised standards Status anxiety & Materialism Linked with lower SWB and depression Too much Choice Satisficers V Maximisers As we interact with others, we compare ourselves to them on many levels. Social comparison is when we compare our situation, attractiveness and wealth to others in either an upward or downward spiral. We tend to interact with people who make us feel good about ourselves and not bad about ourselves. Personality can affect whether we use upward or downward social comparisons and how we use it. Would you rather earn €50,000 a year while others make €25,000, or, €100,000 a year while others make €250,000? Status anxiety is linked to lower SWB and depression. Placing importance on money negatively correlates with life satisfaction, whereas, placing importance on love positively correlates with life satisfaction (Diener & Oishi, 2000, in Heffernon & Boniwell, 2011). However, there is an argument that materialism is only bad for you if it is not within your means which causes strain on an individual. Those who report high materialism along with high income report high well-being (Crawford et al., 2001, in Heffernon & Boniwell, 2011). Finally, too much choice leads to problems for consumers in western society. Information problems, error problems, psychological problems. Satisficers V Maximisers.
11
Global Measures of Happiness
Subjective Happiness Scale (Lyubomirsky & Lepper, 1999) Satisfaction with Life Scale (Diener et al., 1985) PANAS Questionnaire (Watson et al., 1985) Meaning of Life Questionnaire (Steger et al., 2006) Flow Experience Scale (Csikszentmihalyi & Csikszentmihalyi, 1988)
12
Global Measures of SWB Strengths Weaknesses Psychometrically sound
Valid Reliable Efficient Cost effective Kurtz, J. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (in press). Requires accurate reflection and unbiased assessment of one’s happiness Influence of immediate circumstances Sensitive to information accessed before measurement Social comparisons Strack et al., (1988) found no correlation between life satisfaction and dating satisfaction when a question about life satisfaction preceded a question about dating status (e.g., single vs. in a relationship). However, when the question order was reversed, a significant positive correlation emerged. When respondents’ dating status was made accessible, they appeared to use it as a heuristic (or shortcut) to help judge their overall life satisfaction. Social comparisons – even relatively arbitrary ones – can push global SWB ratings in one direction or another, depending on whether the comparison is favorable or unfavorable. For example, encountering an experimenter in a wheelchair creates a downward social comparison that leads to inflated SWB ratings (Strack et al., 1990).
13
Experience Sampling Method (ESM)
More suitable (than global measures) for assessing the affective component frequent positive affect and infrequent negative affect Aggregate of momentary affective experiences encountered throughout daily life Comes from Csikszentmihalyi’s work on ‘flow’ Costly & requires a great deal of participants’ time and co-operation Stemmed from the work of Csikszentmihalyi’s (1990) work on flow. He was interested in when people experience flow in their everyday lives, outside of the lab, he needed an ecologically valid methodology that allowed for sampling participants throughout the course of the day – while they were at school, work, or at leisure to find out how they felt during these different episodes – as an alternative to retrospective reporting methods, such as interviews and questionnaires. Csikszentmihalyi and colleagues gave participants pagers to carry everywhere throughout the day. The pagers were programmed to signal the participants randomly, with each signal serving as a prompt to immediately report their thoughts and feelings using a booklet of paper-and-pencil self-report forms. Ref: Kurtz, J. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (in press)
14
Day Reconstruction Method (DSM)
Proposed by Kahneman et al., (2004) Short-term daily diary of distinct episodes Appropriate for large scale data collections of SWB indicators More cost-effective than ESM, but also requires a lot of participants’ time Provides unique and novel information about what people do and how they feel in their everyday lives Kahneman, Krueger, Schkade, Schwarz, and Stone (2004) proposed a type of short-term daily diary called the day reconstruction method (DRM) as an alternative to ESM. Using a diary format, participants using DRM are required to generate a detailed account of an entire day, broken down into distinct episodes. Instructions are: “Think of the episodes of your day. An episode can begin or end when you move to a different location, change activities, or change the people you are with” (Kahneman et al., 2004, p. 1777). E.g. “trip to grocery store,” “lunch with a friend”, as well as a brief description of where the participant was during the episode, what he or she was doing, and with whom. Then, the episode is rated using a variety of adjectives (e.g., happy, competent, interested, tense, tired) on scales ranging from 0 (not at all) to 6 (very strongly). Findings coming out of this paradigm include a study of 909 working women that revealed that time spent in intimate relations, socializing, relaxing, praying or meditating, and eating were among the most enjoyable, whereas commuting, working, and childcare were among the least enjoyable (Kahneman et al., 2004; Krueger et al., 2009). Mounting evidence suggests that real-time measures (ESM & DSM), contribute unique and novel information about what people do and how they feel in their everyday lives. As work on happiness becomes integrated with national indicators of the quality of life (Diener, Kesebir, & Lucas, 2008), as positive psychological science becomes increasingly popularized, and – perhaps most important - as technology becomes increasingly accessible, these types of measures will arguably become much more common. Ref: Kurtz, J. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (in press)
15
Who is happy? It appears that most of us are indeed happy (Myers, 2000). Five ways to wellbeing – two recent studies, The Foresight Report and Gallup’s most recent world poll, have shown similar finding. The findings suggest that there are five necessary elements for wellbeing Majority of people score in the ‘somewhat satisfied set point’, there fore the majority of the time we view stimuli and circumstances as positive.
16
The Foresight report Connect (relationships) Be active Take notice
“stop to smell the roses” Keep learning Give (random acts of kindness) Conducted by the New Economics Foundation (NEF) Reviews already completed pieces of research on ways to wellbeing. The five ways to well being included…. Connect - when we build relationships with the people around us, we experience greater levels of wellbeing. Be active – taking care of our bodies as well as our mind is a very important factor to wellbeing. Take notice - research has shown that, “stopping to smell the roses” can increase wellbeing. Keep learning – challenging ourselves to learn can enhance our wellbeing. Give - levels of wellbeing can also be enhances by taking part in random acts of kindness.
17
The Gallup organisation
Career wellbeing Social wellbeing Financial wellbeing Physical wellbeing Community wellbeing Career wellbeing – where you spend most of your time during the day Social wellbeing – relationships and experiences of love Financial wellbeing – how well you manage your financial situations Physical wellbeing – ability to have good health and energy Community wellbeing – role and participation within your community Gallups most recent world poll of 150+ countries 66% are doing well in at least one of the areas, whereas only 7% are doing well in all five. The five elements are all things that are within a persons control.
18
Activity: What makes us happy? True or False
Marriage Children Age Income Gender Education Religion True False
19
Income and Happiness Does money make us happy? YES…well a little bit.
Individuals who live in countries with high GDP, such as the USA, on average score higher on wellbeing measures than those living in countries with low GDP, such as Togo (Deaton, 2008)
20
Income and Happiness In order to maintain balanced levels of wellbeing, individuals must take home approximately $5000 per month, anything more will do little to enhance happiness. An extra $10,000 per annum will only bump up your happiness levels by approximately 2 per cent (Christakis & Fowler, 2009).
21
Relationships and Happiness
Being around others enhances individual wellbeing. Spending time in social settings enhances levels of wellbeing among both introverted or extroverted, (Froh et al., 2007). Happier people are more likely to get married, while reporting a happy marriage as they stay together.
22
Relationships and Happiness
The relationship between children and marital satisfaction shows high levels of life satisfaction at marriage, and then drops at the birth of the first child The levels of life satisfaction also continue to drop throughout childhood and adolescence, then returns to high levels when the children leave the home Therefore, having children actually decreases levels of SWB (Heffernon & Boniwell, 2011)
23
Work and Happiness An individual’s job perception can influence wellbeing One third of employee’s perceive work as a ‘calling orientation’ Job orientation Career orientation Calling orientation Job orientation: job = money, not important to overall life. Career orientation: building a career and progressing forward. Calling orientation: workers are immersed healthily in what they do (could relate this to the good and meaningful life, incorporating “flow” which makes us happier)
24
Health and Happiness Diener and Biswas-Diener (2008) have categorised the effects of SWB on physical health into 3 groups; The likelihood a person will contract a specific illness How long the person will live after contracting a life threatening illness How long a persons lifespan is Emotional Style and the Susceptibility to the Common Cold. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65(4):652-7
25
Religion and Happiness
Religious people have reported having slightly higher levels of SWB than those who do not E.g. Belief in something higher, spirituality, afterlife
26
Other Factors and Happiness
Age Gender Education High levels of SWB were found in those with higher educational status Elderly people are as happy as younger people No significant difference of happiness levels between men and women has been found People scoring high on wellbeing were found to have a higher educational status than those who scored lower on the scales
27
Take a break. Have a.....
28
Global Happiness Evidence indicates that SWB levels of given countries are stable (Inglehart & Klingemann, 2000) Social comparison theory gains and losses of different individuals in a nation result in no noticeable shifts in happiness levels for the society as a whole The SWB and happiness of Americans has been examined since 1946 (Inglehart, Foa, Peterson & Welzel, 2008) Social comparison theory suggests that the gains and losses of different individuals in a nation will cancel each other out, resulting in no noticeable shifts in happiness levels for the society as a whole No other country has a comparable database, and the US data shows a flat trend from 1946 to the present (Inglehart, Foa, Peterson and Welzel, 2008)
29
Global happiness Inglehart et al. (2008) found that a sense of control over your life is conducive to happiness Democratic countries generally report higher happiness levels Happy people are more likely to successfully sustain a democracy Inglehart and Klingemann (2000) found that any country that has experienced Communist rule tends to show relatively lower levels of SWB. Even when compared to countries who are a much lower economic level.
30
Activity: Happiest Countries
31
Answers for Activity Activity 1 Costa Rica 1 Denmark 2 Mexico 8 Russia 73 India 115 China 125 Activity 2 A) Costa Rica B) Denmark C) Russia D) China It has been suggested that Latin American countries such as Mexico and Costa Rica may be happier due to their cultural emphasis on family
32
Happiest Places on Earth
Country Score Costa Rica Denmark Puerto Rico Iceland Switzerland Canada Finland Mexico Norway Sweden (World Database of Happiness, 2010) Depending on which poll you look at you will see different countries being listed as being happier – however, either Denmark or Costa Rica are consistently ranked as happiest. For the purpose of this presentation I chose to look at the World Database of happiness as it seemed most relevant to us, other polls look at environmental factors and life expectancy
34
Why is Denmark so Happy? For past 30 years research has consistently shown that Danes tend to be happier (Inglehart & Klingleman, 2000) Welfare state High tax rates people could pay between and 70% tax Social equality 50 -60% of the population consistently rank themselves as being very satisfied with their life However, this means that people don’t chose careers depending on how much money they earn – women highly respected in business and achieve equal pay state provides universal tax-funded childcare, parental leave, health care, education (including university), retirement pensions and sick leave. If you lose your job the government continues to pay up to 90% of your salary for 4 years. Get paid to go to college between $400 and $500. People rarely have to take drastic action such as taking out quick loans therefore tend to have lower debt Population are very environmentally conscious – one third cycle bikes
35
Gross National Happiness
Gross National Happiness (GNH) is an alternative to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as a means of measuring progress within a country Increased wealth isn’t always an indicator of happiness or progress An example of how positive psychology is being implemented to help people around the world – not just viewed as pop psychology anymore being taken seriously..
36
Well-being and Global Policies
In 2009 Nicholas Sarkozy called on nations around the world to stop using GDP as a measure of progress and instead to begin looking at measures of well-being. He said our reliance on GDP may have contributed to the financial crisis In July 2011, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution about happiness. They declared it should have a greater role in development policies. Given the strong relationship between the freedom of a nation and the happiness of its citizens (Inglehart, Foa, Peterson, & Weizel, 2008), the UN resolution on happiness may be more revolutionary than intended, because an obvious way to bolster happiness is to encourage freedom, locally and globally. The resolution said “the pursuit of happiness is a fundamental human goal” and embodies the spirit of the globally agreed targets known as the Millennium Development Goals
37
Set Point Theory Brickman et al. (1978) Lykken and Tellegen (1996)
Lottery study: return to normal level of happiness was attributed to habituation and contrast effects however could be an example of the set-point theory ) found that after a year lottery winners reported happiness levels returned to the same level as the control group. examined happiness amongst twins and found that genetic factors were a far greater indicator of happiness than education, socio-economic status, religion or marital status.
38
Set Point Theory Fujita and Diener (2005) found that there is a modest stability in life satisfaction but that around quarter of the population’s life satisfaction does change significantly A major flaw of the studies investigating the set point theory was that they were all carried out within a single country There are huge variations in happiness levels between countries so unless we assume that there is some difference in basic genetic structures we have to conclude that genetics are not entirely responsible for happiness
39
Situational Factors People’s circumstances account for only 10% of their happiness levels Situational factors refer to one time changes that usually occur independently of effort and engagement (Sheldon & Lyubomirsky, 2006) a person’s education level, the country they live in and marriage
40
Intentional Activity Intentional activity (IA) involves continual effort and engagement in some intentional process (Sheldon & Lyubomirsky, 2006) essentially this is what we do everyday Accounts for 40% of our happiness IA allows for increases in happiness above the levels set out by our circumstances and set point i.e., it is the only aspect of our happiness within our control
41
Intentional Activity Lyubomirsky, Sheldon and Schkade (2005) suggest that when choosing activities we should: Find activities that fit our needs and personalities They should vary, i.e., changing your exercise routine Timing of activities should vary Link: since only aspect of happiness within our control it is important that we chose our activities careful to maximise our happiness.
42
Increasing Your Happiness
Happiness Boosting Increasing Your Happiness
43
Happiness Boosting Activity
In Your Groups You will be assigned an Intervention and administered the Subjective Happiness Scale (Lyubomirsky & Lepper, 1999) Score it and bring results to the top
44
Happiness Interventions
Up until now, the focus has been on what exactly happiness is and the kinds of things that make us happy. Now, the focus is on how to INCREASE happiness or in other words; “Happiness Boosting”.
45
Happiness Boosting Happiness “Boosting” usually happens in the form of interventions Happiness Boosting interventions are important for two reasons: to make people generally happier and, to allow happy people to develop other positive characteristics (Snyder & Lopez, 2005)
46
Past Happiness Interventions
Fordyce (1977) Found that people tend to become happier when they mimic the positive characteristics of people they perceive are happier than them Link to discrepancy theory as Louise outlined
47
Past Happiness Interventions
Seligman, Reivich, Jaycox & Gillham (1995) Found that children who were at risk of developing depressive and mood disorders were significantly less depressed after training in optimistic thinking and problem solving
48
Recent Happiness Interventions
Lyubomirsky (2007) The How of Happiness: A Practical Guide to Getting the Life You Want
49
12 Happiness Activities: Lyubomirsky (2007)
Expressing Gratitude Cultivating Optimism Avoiding Overthinking and Social Comparison Practicing Acts of Kindness Nurturing Social Relationships Developing Strategies for Coping Learning to Forgive Increasing “Flow” Experiences Savoring Life’s Joys Committing to your Goals Practicing Religion and Spirituality Taking Care of your Body (Meditation/ Acting like a Happy Person)
50
Recent Happiness Interventions
Live Happy iPhone application (Signal Patterns & Lyubomirsky, 2008) Designed based on positive psychological research findings in the area of happiness boosting ™
51
Live Happy™ and Signal Patterns
52
Recent Happiness Interventions
Walls (2010) launched a marketing campaign about sharing to the world the link of ice cream and happiness
53
Ice Cream and Happiness
54
Van Oudenhove et al. (2011) 12 healthy, non-obese volunteers had their brains scanned using FMRI Each had a gastric feeding tube positioned Listened to pieces of sad or neutral classical music while they viewed images of human facial expressions depicting either sad or neutral emotion
55
Van Oudenhove et al. (2011) The brain's responses to sadness were significantly reduced when the fatty solution was infused into the stomach Respondents also reported less hunger and a better mood when the fatty solution was given
56
Discussion Think, Pair, Share
. What did you find most interesting/important while learning about happiness? Write down one or two points Discuss with the person beside you Share with the class
57
Questions to Think About
What is happiness, SWB & Positive Affect? Can happiness be measured? Give examples. Is happiness signified by an individual’s global evaluation of his or her life, or is it the aggregate of many moments, as measured by ESM? What factors influence happiness? Can happiness be acquired? What happiness interventions are available?
58
Further Reading Articles Books
Cohen et al. (2003). Emotional Style and the Susceptibility to the Common Cold. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65(4):652-7 Books Heffron, K. and Boniwell, I. (2011). Happiness and Subjective Wellbeing across Nations. In: Positive Psychology Theory, Research and Applications. p Websites
59
References Boniwell, I. (2008). Positive psychology in a nutshell (2nd Ed). London: PWBC. Brickman, P., Coates, D., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (1978). Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, Diener, E. and Biswas-Diener, R. (2008) Happiness: Unlocking the Mysteries of Psychological Wealth. Boston, MA:Blackwell Publishing. Fordyce, M.W. (1977). Development of a program to increase personal happiness. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 24, Fujita, F., & Diener, E. (2005). Life satisfaction set point: Stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, Heffron, K, and Boniwell, I. "Happiness and Subjective Wellbeing Across Nations." Positive psychology: Theory, Research and Applications. Buckingham: Open University Press, Inglehart, R. and Klingemann, H-D. (2000) ‘Genes, culture, democracy and happiness’, in Diener and Suh (2000). Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008). Development, freedom and rising happiness. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, Kristoff, N. D. (2010). The happiest people. The New York Times. Retrieved fromhttp:// Kurtz, J. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (in press). Positive psychology. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York: Guilford Press.
60
References Lykken,D. & Tellegen, A. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomena. Journal of Psychological Sciences, 7, Lyubomirsky, S. (2007). The How of Happiness: A Scientific Approach to Getting the Life You Want. New York: Penguin Press. Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9, Seligman, M.E.P., Reivich, K., Jaycox, L., and Gillham, J. (1995). The Optimistic Child. New York: Houghton Mifflin. Seligman, M. E. (2006). Pleasure, Meaning & Eudaimonia. Retrieved from Sheldon, K. M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2006). Achieving sustainable gains in happiness: Change your actions, not your circumstances. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7, 55–86. Signal Patterns and Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Live Happy. Pleasantville, NY. Snyder, C.R., & Lopez, S. J. (2002). Handbook of Positive Psychology (Eds). New York: Oxford University Press. Unilever. (2010). Ice cream served with a smile. Retrieved from Van Oudenhove, L., McKie, S., Lassman, D., Uddin, B., Paine, P., Coen, S., Gregory, L., Tack, J. and Aziz, Q. (2011). Fatty acid–induced gut-brain signalling attenuates neural and behavioral effects of sad emotion in humans. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 121(8), White, A. (2007). A global projection of subjective well-being: A challenge to positive psychology? Psychtalk :56,
61
Thank you for listening!
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.